wbur.org
support wbur today!
Listen to this story
Thomas Ricks on Iraq Today
photo

By host Tom Ashbrook:

Pulitzer prize-winning military correspondent for the Washington Post Thomas Ricks delivered a debate-changing judgment on the war in Iraq with last year’s hugely-influential book “Fiasco.”

Ricks talked to military men, and the military men saw a devastating fiasco in Iraq. They saw military failures, Congressional failures, and — most of all — failure from the White House.

Now, Tom Ricks is tracking the “surge” and looking for light, but fearing a national tragedy.

This hour On Point: “Fiasco” author Thomas Ricks on the path and consequences of the Iraq War.


Quotes from the Show:

I think it’s simply too early to call the ball on what’s happening in Iraq right now. There’re a lot of counterintuitive signs. … What’s really significant in Iraq … is the change in posture that General Petreas is having the troops have, getting them out of the bases, getting them out living among the people, and it’s much too early to say that’s working or not working.” Thomas Ricks

“We are doing things better. Strikingly, what you have now is the dissonance of 03/04. General Petreas, the new ambassador Ryan Crocker — these are the people who were arguing for a different way several years ago and have now been put in charge. We are operating very differently. … The troop numbers really don’t matter but the different posture does matter. The problem is it’s probably too little too late.” Thomas Ricks

“This war has gone on longer than our involvement in World War II. The enemy has learned a lot from us. It’s a very smart and almost devilish enemy in some ways. And, in many ways, all we’re doing is still squeezing the toothpaste around the country.”

“My thought is that the American troops should leave the country [Iraq] and somehow rally an international force led by the Arab states.” Dori, listener from Iowa

“I don’t feel that the country [US] has a common, collective appreciation of what needs to happen next [in Iraq].” Kelly, listener from Northampton, MA

“I think you’d have a full-out civil war, bloodier than you have now, and I think you would see regional intervention [if there's a full departure of US troops from Iraq]. Iran is already there in spades, I think Syria would be there. You’d probably wind up with a civil war, a regional war fought on the streets of Baghdad between Shiite bodies and Saudi Arabian money. Up in the north, you’d probably have Turkey intervene against the Kurds.” Thomas Ricks

Guests:

Thomas Ricks, Washington Post military correspondent and author of the book “Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq”

 
 

Comments are closed.

Recent Shows
After ‘No Child Left Behind’
Thursday, March 18, 2010

The Obama administration wants to rewrite No Child Left Behind. We’ll ask what’s coming for American education.

Comments [48]
 
The U.S.-Israel Blowup
Thursday, March 18, 2010

Top Pentagon brass complain the Israel-Palestinian impasse is undermining American interests. We’ll look at the US-Israel moment of crisis.

Comments [159]
On Point Blog
Sonny Rollins on Race and Jazz’s Future

Jazz legend Sonny Rollins joined us to reflect on his storied career and give us his thoughts on the future of music. To celebrate his 80th birthday, the hugely influential tenor saxophonist is embarking on yet another national tour.

More »
 
IED’s in Afghanistan: Hard Numbers

The Department of Defense provided On Point with some statistics about IED attacks in Afghanistan, where there has been an increase in the use of such weapons over the past 14 months. It’s striking to see the spike in numbers — from 2,677 IED incidents in 2007 to 8,159 last year.

More » | Comments [2]
 
Christopher Hill: U.S. Troop Withdrawal ‘On Schedule’

U.S. Ambassaor to Iraq Christopher Hill spoke with On Point live from Baghdad today as early voting gets underway, part of the run-up to Sunday’s elections. “So far so good,” Hill said, despite scattered violence. Hill said that the plan to withdraw U.S. combat troops by Sept. 1, and to leave only a residual advisory force of 50,000 or fewer, remains “very much on schedule.” Observers worry that a spike in violence could derail that timeline.

More »