wbur.org
support wbur today!
Listen to this show
Forget the Big Bang Theory
photo

By host Tom Ashbrook:

We all know the story, delivered in grade school textbooks across the country, of how the universe began. The Big Bang. Fourteen billion years ago. Space and time and everything, exploding into being in a flash, and still exploding as celestial bodies race apart across the cosmos.

Well, maybe so. But the Big Bang theory has taken its lumps in recent years.

Now, renegade physicists are making a new case. That it didn’t all start in an instant. That there is no beginning, and no end. And those are fighting words in the halls of science.

This hour On Point: the big rumble over the Big Bang.


Quotes from the Show:

“I think the challenge we’re raising is that the usual picture of the Big Bang is based on an assumption which is that time, space, matter, energy, everything began at the Big Bang. And that assumption was made in the 60s when people got the first strong observational evidence that the Big Bang happened. But it’s really just an assumption and our point of view has come out of new development in physics which are enabling us to describe the behaviour of matter in very extreme conditions such as were present around the Bang. And what we’re seeing is that the Big Bang doesn’t have to be the beginning of time. It’s perfectly possible that the Big Bang was just a violent event in a pre-existing universe.” Neil Turok

“This picture emerged out of a new understanding of the laws of physics which is called M Theory. … [a]ccording to this picture, the world may be comprised of two objects called branes, short for membranes. … And so the picture is that we live in a three-dimensional world, just the height, width and length of ordinary space but separated from our dimensions by a very tiny distance are another three-dimensions and so the whole world is four-dimensional in this picture and these two sets of dimensions can actually collide with each-other. What we discovered is, if they do collide, then something like a Big Bang happens but the density of matter and the size of the universe is not zero at that point. It’s as if two objects clash together and this clash is what releases radiation which fills space.” Neil Turok

“In the what I would regard as the conventional version of the inflationary theory, the Big Bang was also not in that theory the origin of everything but rather one had a very long period of this exponential expansion of the universe, which is what inflation means, and, at different points, different pieces of this inflating universe had stopped inflating and become what I sometimes call pocket universes.” Alan Guth

“… What we call the Big Bang was almost certainly not the actual origin of time in either of the theories that we’re talking about. … The main difference I think [between the inflationary theory and Neil and Paul's theory] is the answer to the question of what is it that made the universe large and smooth everything out. … The inflationary version of cosmology is not cyclic. … It goes on literally forever with new universes being created in other places. The inflationary prediction is that our region of the universe would become ultimately empty and void but meanwhile other universes would srput out in other places in this multiverse. ” Alan Guth

“There’s a little more resistance to the cyclic model but maybe that’s because of the successes so far of inflation. Yet, we do know that there are fundamental things about the early universe and the Big Bang that we don’t understand. … String theory or M theory or these other models of fundamental physics are going to be important in terms of formulating that early universe picture but they’re not complete yet.” Janna Levin

Guests:

Neil Turok, professor of mathematical physics at Cambridge University. He is the co-author of the new book, “Endless Universe: Beyond the Big Bang.”

Alan Guth, professor of physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is the author of “The Inflationary Universe: The Quest for a New Theory of Cosmic Origins.”

Janna Levin, professor of physics and astronomy at Barnard College. She is the author of “How the Universe Got Its Spots: Diary of a Finite Time in a Finite Space.”

 
 
Listener comments
  • I’d like to see a discussion of physics and history. Specifically I’m curious to hear what astrophysics has to say about the relevance of history.

    If time is a mathematically provable illusion, what does that observation say about the thing that Doris Kearns Goodwin recounts and interprets and which the President of the United States is seen to be making?

    If time is an illusion, is history truly bunk or is it perhaps a component of something embedded in our collective life of mind which exists beyond the reality that physics charts?

    Posted by Eric Hagglund, on January 11th, 2009 at 8:42 pm EST
On Point Today
Hour 2
Chemicals in Our Bodies
Monday, July 6, 2009 image

Scientists report that widely used chemicals — endocrine disruptors — are causing serious health problems in humans. We ask what the government is, and is not, doing about it.

Comments [31]
 
Hour 1
Sarah Palin’s Surprise
Monday, July 6, 2009 image

Alaksa Governor Sarah Palin’s out-of-the-blue resignation. We ask what it means for her future — and for the GOP.

Comments [55]

Recent Shows
Crooked Still
Friday, July 3, 2009 image

Tunes from old Appalachia with a new bluegrass twist. The hit folk band “Crooked Still” plays for us in our studio.

Comments [6]
 
Week in the News
Friday, July 3, 2009 image

A U.S. offensive in Afghanistan. Al Franken heads to the Senate. Mark Sanford keeps talking. And unemployment keeps rising. Our weekly news roundtable goes behind the headlines.

Comments [25]
On Point Blog
India, China and the Climate

The passage of the House climate bill – discussed in our first hour today – has been greeted with enthusiasm in many quarters. But in some ways, the real question is whether a global framework can be established in Copenhagen in December, when countries will negotiate a new international treaty to curb greenhouse gases. After all, America emits only [...]

More » | Comments [1]
 
Michael, Ed, and Farrah

The week-in-the-news roundtable always involves tough choices on sound clips – what to include, what to leave out. Amid all the pressing hard news, we often give a nod to a notable person who’s passed away. But this week brought, well, a ridiculous range of choices. So we gave a nod to them all in the roundtable today. And [...]

More » | Comments [2]
 
Planet Money, On Point — Your Questions!

On Wednesday night, June 24, On Point will tape a show before an audience in Boston with two stars of NPR’s “Planet Money,” Adam Davidson and David Kestenbaum. We need your online questions to put to them — about anything from the roots of the economic crisis to NPR’s coverage.
What’s your question about the [...]

More » | Comments [18]