<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Progressive Revival?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival</link>
	<description>On Point is a live, two-hour morning news-analysis program, produced by WBUR 90.9 and NPR.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:12:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frederic C.</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/comment-page-1#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=1704#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>Four more months!

Quatro mas mes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four more months!</p>
<p>Quatro mas mes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederic C.</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/comment-page-1#comment-1075</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=1704#comment-1075</guid>
		<description>Hope is bigger than &#039;man.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope is bigger than &#8216;man.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam E.</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/comment-page-1#comment-1069</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=1704#comment-1069</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t deny it - I&#039;m a Republican. That said, I do like a number of liberal/progressive commentators including Jack Beatty typically.  Ariannna Huffington though drives me nuts. Her whole spiel is basically complaining about the media being even-handed and she&#039;s gone after such benign targets as Tim Russert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t deny it &#8211; I&#8217;m a Republican. That said, I do like a number of liberal/progressive commentators including Jack Beatty typically.  Ariannna Huffington though drives me nuts. Her whole spiel is basically complaining about the media being even-handed and she&#8217;s gone after such benign targets as Tim Russert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lux Interior</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/comment-page-1#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>Lux Interior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=1704#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>McCain lost my consideration with the &quot;We are all Georgians&quot; nonsense. Scary.

For Obama -- Biden helps ease the FISA blow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain lost my consideration with the &#8220;We are all Georgians&#8221; nonsense. Scary.</p>
<p>For Obama &#8212; Biden helps ease the FISA blow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katy Crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/comment-page-1#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator>Katy Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=1704#comment-1056</guid>
		<description>I am a 68 year old white woman, registered as an Independent who usually votes Demo.  I have spent most of my life breaking gender barriers and I would love to see a woman as president, but I am sick to death of these Hillary women who are so-called Democrats, still in full pout, saying they would rather vote for McCain than Obama.  It&#039;s disgraceful and they should be ashamed of themselves.  Don&#039;t they care about Roe v. Wade?  

Here&#039;s a proud vote for Obama!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a 68 year old white woman, registered as an Independent who usually votes Demo.  I have spent most of my life breaking gender barriers and I would love to see a woman as president, but I am sick to death of these Hillary women who are so-called Democrats, still in full pout, saying they would rather vote for McCain than Obama.  It&#8217;s disgraceful and they should be ashamed of themselves.  Don&#8217;t they care about Roe v. Wade?  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a proud vote for Obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/comment-page-1#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=1704#comment-1054</guid>
		<description>George Carlin sums it up:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0u6lCBnRoHQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Carlin sums it up:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0u6lCBnRoHQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0u6lCBnRoHQ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/comment-page-1#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=1704#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;That we are focused on the differences speaks to the larger problem of negative and divisive programing that WBUR has seemingly fallen prey to.&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s part of a larger problem and I feel like I&#039;m in a race with the moderator here because I think some of my comments about this have been deleted.

But basically, the convention is not a very newsworthy event because the whole thing is scripted spectacle and designed to have as few suprises as possible.  But WBUR and others have spent vast resources in coming to Denver so they have to talk about &lt;b&gt;something&lt;/b&gt;; they&#039;ve got to find some interesting attention-getting angle and the Clinton-Obama division is one of the very few genuinely interesting topics at the convention, so as a result it gets amplified or magnified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That we are focused on the differences speaks to the larger problem of negative and divisive programing that WBUR has seemingly fallen prey to.</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s part of a larger problem and I feel like I&#8217;m in a race with the moderator here because I think some of my comments about this have been deleted.</p>
<p>But basically, the convention is not a very newsworthy event because the whole thing is scripted spectacle and designed to have as few suprises as possible.  But WBUR and others have spent vast resources in coming to Denver so they have to talk about <b>something</b>; they&#8217;ve got to find some interesting attention-getting angle and the Clinton-Obama division is one of the very few genuinely interesting topics at the convention, so as a result it gets amplified or magnified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/comment-page-1#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=1704#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;niether obama or hillary have much to say about corporate restraint.&lt;/i&gt;

Why should they?  The Democrats are just as much in the pockets of big corporations as the Republicans.    This is not to say that there&#039;s no difference between the two parties -  I much preferred the 8 years of Bill Clinton&#039;s presidency to the years that followed.   

But let&#039;s be realistic here -  &lt;b&gt;the corporation is THE defining institution of our culture&lt;/b&gt;.   Many Americans have a closer, more frequent relationship with Verizon and Apple and McDonalds and Microsoft than they do with their own families.  The main events of the Democratic convention will be held at the Pepsi Center and Invesco field.   The whole topic of corporations in our national life and and personal lives is WAY bigger than we can discuss here.   On Point could easily devote a week to discussing the role of corporations in everything from politics to language to art to family relations to foreign policy to the environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>niether obama or hillary have much to say about corporate restraint.</i></p>
<p>Why should they?  The Democrats are just as much in the pockets of big corporations as the Republicans.    This is not to say that there&#8217;s no difference between the two parties &#8211;  I much preferred the 8 years of Bill Clinton&#8217;s presidency to the years that followed.   </p>
<p>But let&#8217;s be realistic here &#8211;  <b>the corporation is THE defining institution of our culture</b>.   Many Americans have a closer, more frequent relationship with Verizon and Apple and McDonalds and Microsoft than they do with their own families.  The main events of the Democratic convention will be held at the Pepsi Center and Invesco field.   The whole topic of corporations in our national life and and personal lives is WAY bigger than we can discuss here.   On Point could easily devote a week to discussing the role of corporations in everything from politics to language to art to family relations to foreign policy to the environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/comment-page-1#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=1704#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;it’s starting to look as if the Republican smear machine is going to convince the general public that the Democrats are in cahoots with satin&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

As long as it&#039;s satin from fair-traded, renewable resources such as organically-fed silkworms, and not polyester from imported oil, then I don&#039;t see the problem with Obama getting his funding from the textile industry.

&lt;i&gt;One of many sad things about the divisions that Clinton has engendered is that those divisions do not reflect deep policy differences. As far and I can tell, Hillary was fighting to the bitter end for Hillary&lt;/i&gt;

The fact that we&#039;re discussing this so long after the primaries shows how much damage the Clintonistas have done.   The fact is that if Obama loses this will become part of the political legacy of the Clintons (both Bill and Hillary).  It&#039;s not too late for them to decide which is more important:  their egos or the Democratic party.  But it&#039;s almost too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;it’s starting to look as if the Republican smear machine is going to convince the general public that the Democrats are in cahoots with satin&#8221;</i></p>
<p>As long as it&#8217;s satin from fair-traded, renewable resources such as organically-fed silkworms, and not polyester from imported oil, then I don&#8217;t see the problem with Obama getting his funding from the textile industry.</p>
<p><i>One of many sad things about the divisions that Clinton has engendered is that those divisions do not reflect deep policy differences. As far and I can tell, Hillary was fighting to the bitter end for Hillary</i></p>
<p>The fact that we&#8217;re discussing this so long after the primaries shows how much damage the Clintonistas have done.   The fact is that if Obama loses this will become part of the political legacy of the Clintons (both Bill and Hillary).  It&#8217;s not too late for them to decide which is more important:  their egos or the Democratic party.  But it&#8217;s almost too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda L</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/comment-page-1#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=1704#comment-1042</guid>
		<description>As a long-term Democrat, I think &quot;division&quot; in the Democratic Party is being way too hyped up by the media and today&#039;s On Point demonstrates to me that WBUR succumbed to this type of media coverage. This is very disappointing.

The media, including WBUR, is responsible for strengthening the polarization between supporters of Obama and Clinton. This is a disservice to the Democratic Pparty and to those of us who see little difference between the two in terms of their ideals or their policies.

Yes, there are some differences but many more similarities. That we are focused on the differences speaks to the larger problem of negative and divisive programing that WBUR has seemingly fallen prey to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a long-term Democrat, I think &#8220;division&#8221; in the Democratic Party is being way too hyped up by the media and today&#8217;s On Point demonstrates to me that WBUR succumbed to this type of media coverage. This is very disappointing.</p>
<p>The media, including WBUR, is responsible for strengthening the polarization between supporters of Obama and Clinton. This is a disservice to the Democratic Pparty and to those of us who see little difference between the two in terms of their ideals or their policies.</p>
<p>Yes, there are some differences but many more similarities. That we are focused on the differences speaks to the larger problem of negative and divisive programing that WBUR has seemingly fallen prey to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Fnord</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/comment-page-1#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Fnord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=1704#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t hear most of it; did anyone point out how heterogeneous the New Deal coalition was?  For an example:  Klansmen and their  chief bug-a-boos (urban Catholics and Jews, rural black people)?

Yes, it did help the Klansmen stay in the ascendant a bit longer (being in charge of the relief money and jobs gives you power) but it set in motion events that led to their losing a lot of power and living to see their kids vote Republican.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t hear most of it; did anyone point out how heterogeneous the New Deal coalition was?  For an example:  Klansmen and their  chief bug-a-boos (urban Catholics and Jews, rural black people)?</p>
<p>Yes, it did help the Klansmen stay in the ascendant a bit longer (being in charge of the relief money and jobs gives you power) but it set in motion events that led to their losing a lot of power and living to see their kids vote Republican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/comment-page-1#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=1704#comment-1039</guid>
		<description>Jack Beatty is right on.  its a disgrace to talk about progressives and ignore corporations.  Did any of Teddy Roosevelt&#039;s (republican) progressive reforms effectively survive?  Neither Obama or Hillary have much to say about corporate restraint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack Beatty is right on.  its a disgrace to talk about progressives and ignore corporations.  Did any of Teddy Roosevelt&#8217;s (republican) progressive reforms effectively survive?  Neither Obama or Hillary have much to say about corporate restraint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/comment-page-1#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=1704#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>One of many sad things about the divisions that Clinton has engendered is that those divisions do not reflect deep policy differences.  As far and I can tell, Hillary was fighting to the bitter end for Hillary, not for any particular platform that would provide a legitimate rationale for disunity, or which could be resolved by modifying the party platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of many sad things about the divisions that Clinton has engendered is that those divisions do not reflect deep policy differences.  As far and I can tell, Hillary was fighting to the bitter end for Hillary, not for any particular platform that would provide a legitimate rationale for disunity, or which could be resolved by modifying the party platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederic C.</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/comment-page-1#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=1704#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>F.Y.I. I am a Hillarian. The primaries have given new light to the state of the feminist (a beautiful word) struggle to make equal opportunities for women. If history can show that Hillary supporters put Obama over the top in &#039;08, the gains will be greater than if he loses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F.Y.I. I am a Hillarian. The primaries have given new light to the state of the feminist (a beautiful word) struggle to make equal opportunities for women. If history can show that Hillary supporters put Obama over the top in &#8216;08, the gains will be greater than if he loses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/comment-page-1#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=1704#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>Arianna has it right on the money in her comments about the vast difference between Obama and McCain on issues such as healthcare.  The caller who claimed that Obama would have voted for authorization for the war along with Kerry, Kennedy, etc was wrong about Kennedy.  He voted against authorization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arianna has it right on the money in her comments about the vast difference between Obama and McCain on issues such as healthcare.  The caller who claimed that Obama would have voted for authorization for the war along with Kerry, Kennedy, etc was wrong about Kennedy.  He voted against authorization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederic C.</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/comment-page-1#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=1704#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>There will be three losses if B. Obama loses in &#039;08. 
1. Obama &#039;08 of course,
2. Hillary &#039;12
3. Hillary &#039;16

If that does not fire up the reticent Hillarians, then I don&#039;t know what will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There will be three losses if B. Obama loses in &#8216;08.<br />
1. Obama &#8216;08 of course,<br />
2. Hillary &#8216;12<br />
3. Hillary &#8216;16</p>
<p>If that does not fire up the reticent Hillarians, then I don&#8217;t know what will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/08/the-progressive-revival/comment-page-1#comment-1032</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=1704#comment-1032</guid>
		<description>I hate to say this but I think the Democrats are going to lose the presidency and win more seats in the two houses.

I hope Obama wins, but it&#039;s starting to look as if the Republican smear machine is going to convince the general public that the Democrats are in cahoots with satin and are unpatriotic. It&#039;s seems to be working. The American people who by and large seem to me to be to be very uneducated with matters of politics, are always fooled by this BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to say this but I think the Democrats are going to lose the presidency and win more seats in the two houses.</p>
<p>I hope Obama wins, but it&#8217;s starting to look as if the Republican smear machine is going to convince the general public that the Democrats are in cahoots with satin and are unpatriotic. It&#8217;s seems to be working. The American people who by and large seem to me to be to be very uneducated with matters of politics, are always fooled by this BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
