<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week in the News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week</link>
	<description>On Point is a live, two-hour morning news-analysis program, produced by WBUR 90.9 and NPR.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:17:12 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-2#comment-2266</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2266</guid>
		<description>Spokesman for VRWC how wrong you are.

I guess the fact that more Democrats have been registered than Republicans does not count. This was all done by people hitting the streets in registration drives.

Right now it&#039;s 2 to 1, Democrats to Republicans registered to vote. So unless the Republicans figure out a way to steal the election, or all the independents vote for them, it does not seem like McCain will win.
Even if he does, he will have to make some huge compromises as the Dems will have both houses.
Forget about a right to life Judges in the supreme court. So all you zealots out there will have pray harder for the second coming or some other fantasy. 

Of course they all have to vote.

However I realize that your trying to be funny. Which is interesting since the Republicans have been in power for the last 8 years and we have the biggest financial mess since the Great Depression. I do agree that it is amazing how the Republicans have been able to run against themselves and somehow people believe them that &#039;change&#039; is going to come to Washington.

One more interesting note, Greenspan the darling of the right is on record saying that Obama&#039;s plan for the economy is the only one that will work, as McCain&#039;s is a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spokesman for VRWC how wrong you are.</p>
<p>I guess the fact that more Democrats have been registered than Republicans does not count. This was all done by people hitting the streets in registration drives.</p>
<p>Right now it&#8217;s 2 to 1, Democrats to Republicans registered to vote. So unless the Republicans figure out a way to steal the election, or all the independents vote for them, it does not seem like McCain will win.<br />
Even if he does, he will have to make some huge compromises as the Dems will have both houses.<br />
Forget about a right to life Judges in the supreme court. So all you zealots out there will have pray harder for the second coming or some other fantasy. </p>
<p>Of course they all have to vote.</p>
<p>However I realize that your trying to be funny. Which is interesting since the Republicans have been in power for the last 8 years and we have the biggest financial mess since the Great Depression. I do agree that it is amazing how the Republicans have been able to run against themselves and somehow people believe them that &#8216;change&#8217; is going to come to Washington.</p>
<p>One more interesting note, Greenspan the darling of the right is on record saying that Obama&#8217;s plan for the economy is the only one that will work, as McCain&#8217;s is a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Groucho</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-2#comment-2263</link>
		<dc:creator>Groucho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2263</guid>
		<description>Anonymous is right.  You people should stop listening to the news, reading the newspaper, calling in to Tom&#039;s show, and doing anything whatsoever to inform yourself about the issues.  The elite media organizations, like NPR, are defeatists, anyway.  If you want to know something about a candidate, you should just watch there advertisements on TV, or just listen to Rush Limbaugh.  What else do you need to know?  

Or look at it this way, appeasers.  Palin is going to give an interview on Sean Hannity&#039;s radio program.  Why don&#039;t you bring your Jack Beatty-listening liberal behinds over to A.M. and find out what a real interview sounds like.  

Furthermore, I recommend you just relax and stop being such doom and gloomers.  See, God has a plan.  And it doesn&#039;t include talking to terrorists, which what you&#039;d do if you could.  Sorry, librals.  There just is no getting around it.  God, guns, and lipstick.  Wham, bam, thank you Ma&#039;am!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous is right.  You people should stop listening to the news, reading the newspaper, calling in to Tom&#8217;s show, and doing anything whatsoever to inform yourself about the issues.  The elite media organizations, like NPR, are defeatists, anyway.  If you want to know something about a candidate, you should just watch there advertisements on TV, or just listen to Rush Limbaugh.  What else do you need to know?  </p>
<p>Or look at it this way, appeasers.  Palin is going to give an interview on Sean Hannity&#8217;s radio program.  Why don&#8217;t you bring your Jack Beatty-listening liberal behinds over to A.M. and find out what a real interview sounds like.  </p>
<p>Furthermore, I recommend you just relax and stop being such doom and gloomers.  See, God has a plan.  And it doesn&#8217;t include talking to terrorists, which what you&#8217;d do if you could.  Sorry, librals.  There just is no getting around it.  God, guns, and lipstick.  Wham, bam, thank you Ma&#8217;am!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-2#comment-2242</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2242</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It’s so much more effective than actually taking some action to change the outcome of the campaign.
&lt;/i&gt;

They&#039;re not mutually exclusive.

Anyway, The Iowa Electronic Markets, which is far and away the more consistently reliable &quot;poll&quot; on the planet because it&#039;s the only one where people have to put their money where their mouth is, still shows Obama leading as he has all year.

And today&#039;s economic news and the meltdown on Wall Street will only help the Dem&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It’s so much more effective than actually taking some action to change the outcome of the campaign.<br />
</i></p>
<p>They&#8217;re not mutually exclusive.</p>
<p>Anyway, The Iowa Electronic Markets, which is far and away the more consistently reliable &#8220;poll&#8221; on the planet because it&#8217;s the only one where people have to put their money where their mouth is, still shows Obama leading as he has all year.</p>
<p>And today&#8217;s economic news and the meltdown on Wall Street will only help the Dem&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous (Spokesman for VRWC)</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-2#comment-2229</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous (Spokesman for VRWC)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2229</guid>
		<description>Dear On Point Listeners,

As the anonymous spokesman appointed to represent the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, I just wanted to thank you all for your input in the above posts.  Fortunately, the slection of Sarah Palin as the GOP VP nominee is so devious that even you pointy-headed NPR listeners will not be able to alert enough of your stupid fellow citizens to sway the election.  McCain/Palin are rolling Obama/Biden and there&#039;s no end in sight!

Don&#039;t let this news discourage you, though.  Fight the good fight and keep posting your comments after each show!  It&#039;s so much more effective than actually taking some action to change the outcome of the campaign.

Take Care.  Oh, and I&#039;ll see you guys and whatever loser you nominate in 2012! (We&#039;ll crush him/her, too.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear On Point Listeners,</p>
<p>As the anonymous spokesman appointed to represent the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, I just wanted to thank you all for your input in the above posts.  Fortunately, the slection of Sarah Palin as the GOP VP nominee is so devious that even you pointy-headed NPR listeners will not be able to alert enough of your stupid fellow citizens to sway the election.  McCain/Palin are rolling Obama/Biden and there&#8217;s no end in sight!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let this news discourage you, though.  Fight the good fight and keep posting your comments after each show!  It&#8217;s so much more effective than actually taking some action to change the outcome of the campaign.</p>
<p>Take Care.  Oh, and I&#8217;ll see you guys and whatever loser you nominate in 2012! (We&#8217;ll crush him/her, too.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-2#comment-2169</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 05:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2169</guid>
		<description>When you have 40 to 50 million people who do not believe in evolution (or science for that matter) and then build a museum that tries to prove their point with dioramas depicting Adam and Eve with Velociraptors all living in peaceful harmony no amount of reading is going to help.

People who take the bible as a literal document when it clearly is full of metaphors and meanings that reflect the superstitions of the time period they were written you can&#039;t expect them to think for themselves.

After all it&#039;s all in God&#039;s plan, (I have heard Palin say this) whatever that is.

I don&#039;t know about the rest of you but I didn&#039;t get that memo.

George Carlin has an excellent routine on this.

&quot;Religion has a convinced people that there is an invisible man living in the sky who needs money.&quot;

Classic...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeSSwKffj9o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you have 40 to 50 million people who do not believe in evolution (or science for that matter) and then build a museum that tries to prove their point with dioramas depicting Adam and Eve with Velociraptors all living in peaceful harmony no amount of reading is going to help.</p>
<p>People who take the bible as a literal document when it clearly is full of metaphors and meanings that reflect the superstitions of the time period they were written you can&#8217;t expect them to think for themselves.</p>
<p>After all it&#8217;s all in God&#8217;s plan, (I have heard Palin say this) whatever that is.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about the rest of you but I didn&#8217;t get that memo.</p>
<p>George Carlin has an excellent routine on this.</p>
<p>&#8220;Religion has a convinced people that there is an invisible man living in the sky who needs money.&#8221;</p>
<p>Classic&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeSSwKffj9o" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeSSwKffj9o</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-2#comment-2165</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2165</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Also, Tom was very tough on the caller who mentioned “the ignorant masses”. When so many people in this country believed that Iraq was involved with 911 and now mistakenly believe that Barak Obama is a muslim, what is wrong with a little honesty? The fact is that most people I know don’t pay enough attention to politics to really know what is going on, and could well be described as ignorant. I happen to believe this is the major reason we keep electing so many mediocre people into office.&lt;/i&gt;

I want to second this.    I think we need to come to grips with this basic problem and stop being in denial about it.   Ignorance, and &lt;b&gt;willful&lt;/b&gt; ignorance at that, by ordinary citizens is the central problem of our democracy.

And both the left and the right keep making excuses for it.  &quot;It&#039;s the corporate media&quot;  &quot;It&#039;s the leftist media&quot;, etc.  ANYTHING, as long as people don&#039;t have to take responsibility for their own decisions about how and where they gather news and information.

The apologists on the left and the right both think that the masses are duped by propaganda from the other side but they never explain why &lt;b&gt;they&lt;/b&gt; have somehow avoided this fate.  Metal plates in their heads?  Who knows?

We&#039;re &lt;b&gt;all&lt;/b&gt; capable of making decisions about how much effort to invest in being well-informed.   The choice to rely on Fox or CNN is just that: a CHOICE.     I don&#039;t watch TV.   This is a deliberate decision because I think it dumbs-down everything.  But the average American spends in excess of 4 hours a day    watching TV.  If he just spent an hour reading a newspaper or a magazine or a book, he&#039;d be better-informed than 90% of his compatriots.   Again, we need to recognize that people are responsible for their choices, and many Americans choose to be ignorant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Also, Tom was very tough on the caller who mentioned “the ignorant masses”. When so many people in this country believed that Iraq was involved with 911 and now mistakenly believe that Barak Obama is a muslim, what is wrong with a little honesty? The fact is that most people I know don’t pay enough attention to politics to really know what is going on, and could well be described as ignorant. I happen to believe this is the major reason we keep electing so many mediocre people into office.</i></p>
<p>I want to second this.    I think we need to come to grips with this basic problem and stop being in denial about it.   Ignorance, and <b>willful</b> ignorance at that, by ordinary citizens is the central problem of our democracy.</p>
<p>And both the left and the right keep making excuses for it.  &#8220;It&#8217;s the corporate media&#8221;  &#8220;It&#8217;s the leftist media&#8221;, etc.  ANYTHING, as long as people don&#8217;t have to take responsibility for their own decisions about how and where they gather news and information.</p>
<p>The apologists on the left and the right both think that the masses are duped by propaganda from the other side but they never explain why <b>they</b> have somehow avoided this fate.  Metal plates in their heads?  Who knows?</p>
<p>We&#8217;re <b>all</b> capable of making decisions about how much effort to invest in being well-informed.   The choice to rely on Fox or CNN is just that: a CHOICE.     I don&#8217;t watch TV.   This is a deliberate decision because I think it dumbs-down everything.  But the average American spends in excess of 4 hours a day    watching TV.  If he just spent an hour reading a newspaper or a magazine or a book, he&#8217;d be better-informed than 90% of his compatriots.   Again, we need to recognize that people are responsible for their choices, and many Americans choose to be ignorant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-2#comment-2162</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 01:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2162</guid>
		<description>Maureen,

I think that Tom was being sure the caller wasn&#039;t simply characterizing vast numbers of voters as &quot;ignorant&quot; on his show.  I think that&#039;s appropriate.  

I appreciate the civil tone that gets maintained on this show, and the people who call in with more conservative or pro-war points of view make an important contribution to the program.  I agree that it can be very frustrating when people seem under-informed, particularly on issues like Obama&#039;s Christian religion.  

I am a liberal.  Actually, I&#039;m a tax and spend liberal.  And a defeatist.  

But I appreciate the mediation of this show and the way Tom welcomes people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maureen,</p>
<p>I think that Tom was being sure the caller wasn&#8217;t simply characterizing vast numbers of voters as &#8220;ignorant&#8221; on his show.  I think that&#8217;s appropriate.  </p>
<p>I appreciate the civil tone that gets maintained on this show, and the people who call in with more conservative or pro-war points of view make an important contribution to the program.  I agree that it can be very frustrating when people seem under-informed, particularly on issues like Obama&#8217;s Christian religion.  </p>
<p>I am a liberal.  Actually, I&#8217;m a tax and spend liberal.  And a defeatist.  </p>
<p>But I appreciate the mediation of this show and the way Tom welcomes people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Alur</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-2#comment-2159</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Alur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2159</guid>
		<description>Jack,

I wanted a repeat of the James Joyce quote on life, politics and low comedy...

I will throw in a couple of interesting Joyce&#039;s relevant quotes including:

“The poor man starves while they are grassing their royal mountain stags or shooting peasants and partridges in their purblind pomp of pelf and power

“A man&#039;s errors are his portals of discovery.”
					
“Men are governed by lines of intellect - women: by curves of emotion&quot;

Working on a new book entitled, &quot;Lipstick, PinkSlips and   long legs!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack,</p>
<p>I wanted a repeat of the James Joyce quote on life, politics and low comedy&#8230;</p>
<p>I will throw in a couple of interesting Joyce&#8217;s relevant quotes including:</p>
<p>“The poor man starves while they are grassing their royal mountain stags or shooting peasants and partridges in their purblind pomp of pelf and power</p>
<p>“A man&#8217;s errors are his portals of discovery.”</p>
<p>“Men are governed by lines of intellect &#8211; women: by curves of emotion&#8221;</p>
<p>Working on a new book entitled, &#8220;Lipstick, PinkSlips and   long legs!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-2#comment-2158</link>
		<dc:creator>G Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2158</guid>
		<description>The bottom line is despite the buzz about Governor Palin, she does not change the issues. So she&#039;s anti-abortion, the platform already had an anti-abortion plank. She does not add anything new to the race. If anything, she serves to distract voters from the issues and the Republicans are using that to advantage. In the end, distraction is all they have since they seem unable to talk about issues. Even the convention did nothing in the way of discussing issues or difference with Democrats. This race is still one for the Democrats to lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bottom line is despite the buzz about Governor Palin, she does not change the issues. So she&#8217;s anti-abortion, the platform already had an anti-abortion plank. She does not add anything new to the race. If anything, she serves to distract voters from the issues and the Republicans are using that to advantage. In the end, distraction is all they have since they seem unable to talk about issues. Even the convention did nothing in the way of discussing issues or difference with Democrats. This race is still one for the Democrats to lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maureen</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-2#comment-2153</link>
		<dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2153</guid>
		<description>I love On Point, but during this program it was disappointing to hear Tom Ashbrook repeatedly say that people are flocking to hear Sarah Palin speak, as though that means the Republicans have a good chance of winning now. The Republican base cares mostly about one or two social issues and less about the big picture, including their own economic self-interest. I can&#039;t imagine that most Independents are going to vote for this ticket with Palin being so conservative.

Also, Tom was very tough on the caller who mentioned &quot;the ignorant masses&quot;. When so many people in this country believed that Iraq was involved with 911 and now mistakenly believe that Barak Obama is a muslim, what is wrong with a little honesty? The fact is that most people I know don&#039;t pay enough attention to politics to really know what is going on, and could well be described as ignorant. I happen to believe this is the major reason we keep electing so many mediocre people into office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love On Point, but during this program it was disappointing to hear Tom Ashbrook repeatedly say that people are flocking to hear Sarah Palin speak, as though that means the Republicans have a good chance of winning now. The Republican base cares mostly about one or two social issues and less about the big picture, including their own economic self-interest. I can&#8217;t imagine that most Independents are going to vote for this ticket with Palin being so conservative.</p>
<p>Also, Tom was very tough on the caller who mentioned &#8220;the ignorant masses&#8221;. When so many people in this country believed that Iraq was involved with 911 and now mistakenly believe that Barak Obama is a muslim, what is wrong with a little honesty? The fact is that most people I know don&#8217;t pay enough attention to politics to really know what is going on, and could well be described as ignorant. I happen to believe this is the major reason we keep electing so many mediocre people into office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-2#comment-2150</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2150</guid>
		<description>Sarah Palin is just like George W. Bush.
She hires people who are her friends and uses the power of her office to try and silence foes. She fires people who disagree with her.

The Democrats should forget about her and focus on McCain. It&#039;s about him, not her and the Palin bubble is going to burst in the next few weeks.

I said this before, she&#039;s a modern day Huey Long.

From today&#039;s NY Times:

&#039;Once Elected, Palin Hired Friends and Lashed Foes&#039;

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us/politics/14palin.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin is just like George W. Bush.<br />
She hires people who are her friends and uses the power of her office to try and silence foes. She fires people who disagree with her.</p>
<p>The Democrats should forget about her and focus on McCain. It&#8217;s about him, not her and the Palin bubble is going to burst in the next few weeks.</p>
<p>I said this before, she&#8217;s a modern day Huey Long.</p>
<p>From today&#8217;s NY Times:</p>
<p>&#8216;Once Elected, Palin Hired Friends and Lashed Foes&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us/politics/14palin.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us/politics/14palin.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-1#comment-2132</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2132</guid>
		<description>Michael,

You write that you find Palin &quot;refreshing&quot; because she is &quot;soo normal.&quot;

I&#039;ve had it with this sort of thinking.  It sounds like an affable, salt-of-the-earth pragmatism.  It is, however, incredibly arrogant and silly.

We&#039;re not electing the head of the PTA.  We&#039;re talking about a person who may make decisions about war and peace for this country.

The fact that Palin was not humiliated during her interview with Gibson is being touted as a kind of triumpth.

But there was no evidence that she is a flexible thinker, no suggestion that she is intellectually curious or likely to seek opinions from people with different world views than her own.

She sounds to me a great deal &quot;like&quot; the last person we sent to high office because he reminded us of people we drink beer with:  George W. Bush.

This time, I say we go with the guy that sounds (and dresses) like your sociology teacher who gave you a B- no matter how hard you worked.

Maybe we can try the &quot;With whom would you rather go bowling?&quot; test next time.

That would be a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>You write that you find Palin &#8220;refreshing&#8221; because she is &#8220;soo normal.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had it with this sort of thinking.  It sounds like an affable, salt-of-the-earth pragmatism.  It is, however, incredibly arrogant and silly.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re not electing the head of the PTA.  We&#8217;re talking about a person who may make decisions about war and peace for this country.</p>
<p>The fact that Palin was not humiliated during her interview with Gibson is being touted as a kind of triumpth.</p>
<p>But there was no evidence that she is a flexible thinker, no suggestion that she is intellectually curious or likely to seek opinions from people with different world views than her own.</p>
<p>She sounds to me a great deal &#8220;like&#8221; the last person we sent to high office because he reminded us of people we drink beer with:  George W. Bush.</p>
<p>This time, I say we go with the guy that sounds (and dresses) like your sociology teacher who gave you a B- no matter how hard you worked.</p>
<p>Maybe we can try the &#8220;With whom would you rather go bowling?&#8221; test next time.</p>
<p>That would be a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john decker</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-1#comment-2129</link>
		<dc:creator>john decker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 09:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2129</guid>
		<description>The Bush administration has been all about transferring wealth from the current middle and lower upper class and future taxpayers of those classes to the mega-investor class. See the use of contractors in Iraq, the nonsensical Missile Defense &quot;system,&quot; enormous defense expenditures, the financial crises,support for HMOs, foot dragging on energy reinvention, and suppression of unions for some of the ways the team at the top gilds the most gilded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bush administration has been all about transferring wealth from the current middle and lower upper class and future taxpayers of those classes to the mega-investor class. See the use of contractors in Iraq, the nonsensical Missile Defense &#8220;system,&#8221; enormous defense expenditures, the financial crises,support for HMOs, foot dragging on energy reinvention, and suppression of unions for some of the ways the team at the top gilds the most gilded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john decker</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-1#comment-2128</link>
		<dc:creator>john decker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 09:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2128</guid>
		<description>Regarding the financial meltdown:

Something like a new Truman Commission should be formed. Legislation should be passed exposing every asset owned by present and former executives, board managers, and major participatory note and equity holders (all the actual managers of the enterprises), to confiscation to repay the minor financial players, misled consumers (small profiteers should be prosecuted as much as the large ones)and taxpayers.

This mess and the savings and load debacle demonstrate that there are plenty of financial experts ready to scalp the markets and taxpayers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the financial meltdown:</p>
<p>Something like a new Truman Commission should be formed. Legislation should be passed exposing every asset owned by present and former executives, board managers, and major participatory note and equity holders (all the actual managers of the enterprises), to confiscation to repay the minor financial players, misled consumers (small profiteers should be prosecuted as much as the large ones)and taxpayers.</p>
<p>This mess and the savings and load debacle demonstrate that there are plenty of financial experts ready to scalp the markets and taxpayers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disappointed</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-1#comment-2124</link>
		<dc:creator>Disappointed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2124</guid>
		<description>This was not a serious program.  I understand that when I listen to right-wing talk radio on a commercial program that I am going to get bias aimed at entertainment more than civil discourse.  This was the left wing version of the same thing.  This program is why conservatives complain about NPR as being part of the liberal media. Tom Ashbrook has a better record than this.  He is capable of producing a forum for serious discourse.  This fell far short of that.  I want to live in a country where people can engage in civil discourse; that involves having the patience to allow intelligent people with conservative views to articulate the reasons for their views.  Could you please aim a little higher in the future?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was not a serious program.  I understand that when I listen to right-wing talk radio on a commercial program that I am going to get bias aimed at entertainment more than civil discourse.  This was the left wing version of the same thing.  This program is why conservatives complain about NPR as being part of the liberal media. Tom Ashbrook has a better record than this.  He is capable of producing a forum for serious discourse.  This fell far short of that.  I want to live in a country where people can engage in civil discourse; that involves having the patience to allow intelligent people with conservative views to articulate the reasons for their views.  Could you please aim a little higher in the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-1#comment-2121</link>
		<dc:creator>G Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2121</guid>
		<description>1. John McCain did run a mostly true ad this week stating the problems with the country are due to the Republican Party.
2. The Senator also admits to making snap decisions which tend to miss their mark but he is willing to live with the consequences. As a voter, I am not willing to do so.
3. The only reason we have a two party system is we are taught this even before beginning school. The preferred way to change this is vote your conscience with a third party candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. John McCain did run a mostly true ad this week stating the problems with the country are due to the Republican Party.<br />
2. The Senator also admits to making snap decisions which tend to miss their mark but he is willing to live with the consequences. As a voter, I am not willing to do so.<br />
3. The only reason we have a two party system is we are taught this even before beginning school. The preferred way to change this is vote your conscience with a third party candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justanother</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-1#comment-2116</link>
		<dc:creator>justanother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2116</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I can&#039;t stand Palin.  When she spoke in the GOP convention, it was just alright, she didn&#039;t do too bad on a speech written by others.  But if she speaks from her own head, oh, that&#039;s real bad, it&#039;s like a talking head has no content.  The more I watched her, the more scary it gets to think she can wind up in the white house.  

Either John McCain&#039;s campaign underestimates women or most of the women in this country buy this crappy package?  I hope it&#039;s the first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I can&#8217;t stand Palin.  When she spoke in the GOP convention, it was just alright, she didn&#8217;t do too bad on a speech written by others.  But if she speaks from her own head, oh, that&#8217;s real bad, it&#8217;s like a talking head has no content.  The more I watched her, the more scary it gets to think she can wind up in the white house.  </p>
<p>Either John McCain&#8217;s campaign underestimates women or most of the women in this country buy this crappy package?  I hope it&#8217;s the first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: delfinajones</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-1#comment-2114</link>
		<dc:creator>delfinajones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2114</guid>
		<description>Republicans have a fetus fetish but as soon as the baby is born---buh bye.
 Killing humans in Iraq, or anywhere else- suits them real well. 

Poor mothers should get a job at McDonald&#039;s and leave the kids alone at home. No wellfare unless you are a big brokerage firm or an airline!!!!

Young poor teens should not have birth control but practice abstinence like Bristol Palin--not!

Oh but Bristol Palin has a Republican  mothers so this teen is now the Republican Virgin Mary and gets to  stand proudly in front of all Americans, unmarried, with teh supposed father.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans have a fetus fetish but as soon as the baby is born&#8212;buh bye.<br />
 Killing humans in Iraq, or anywhere else- suits them real well. </p>
<p>Poor mothers should get a job at McDonald&#8217;s and leave the kids alone at home. No wellfare unless you are a big brokerage firm or an airline!!!!</p>
<p>Young poor teens should not have birth control but practice abstinence like Bristol Palin&#8211;not!</p>
<p>Oh but Bristol Palin has a Republican  mothers so this teen is now the Republican Virgin Mary and gets to  stand proudly in front of all Americans, unmarried, with teh supposed father.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederic C.</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-1#comment-2111</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2111</guid>
		<description>How is NPR commercial? Or the BBC? Can you point to examples of either of them altering their stories or coverage based on commercial considerations?(Peter Nelson)

I don&#039;t take notes when I listen to NPR or the BBC, but I am certain that I have heard editorial omissions on stories that were revisited ten or fifteen years later. Granted most of the omissions are for time but they are made nonetheless. 

This morning, Morning Edition had a story on Judge Isaac Borenstein, who stood up to &quot;mob mentality&quot; by ordering a new trial in the Fells Acre abuse case.  Maybe I was distracted by the traffic, but I think one of the defendants was not mentioned. 

The BBC may not be commercial but they have and interest in the commercial success of Great Britain. And the BBC frequently makes editorial decisions to be in line with Whitehall.

How do we get more people to care?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is NPR commercial? Or the BBC? Can you point to examples of either of them altering their stories or coverage based on commercial considerations?(Peter Nelson)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t take notes when I listen to NPR or the BBC, but I am certain that I have heard editorial omissions on stories that were revisited ten or fifteen years later. Granted most of the omissions are for time but they are made nonetheless. </p>
<p>This morning, Morning Edition had a story on Judge Isaac Borenstein, who stood up to &#8220;mob mentality&#8221; by ordering a new trial in the Fells Acre abuse case.  Maybe I was distracted by the traffic, but I think one of the defendants was not mentioned. </p>
<p>The BBC may not be commercial but they have and interest in the commercial success of Great Britain. And the BBC frequently makes editorial decisions to be in line with Whitehall.</p>
<p>How do we get more people to care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/09/12week/comment-page-1#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=2323#comment-2110</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Over the long-long term should a utopian take heart with the direction civilisations are heading or does change for the better come from radical new ideas?&lt;/i&gt;

I think it requires new ideas -  sometimes radical, sometimes incremental. 

Of course the world has lots of new ideas every day - that&#039;s why 2008 is different from 2007, which was different from 1997, etc.  Social networking websites and Youtube and iPhones and sheep that make human blood, and machines by Codon that make custom DNA are all recent new ideas that have the potential to change things, possibly for the better.

Journalism is in a lot of trouble these days because the best, most in-depth journalism for a century has been newspaper journalism, but newspapers are in fast decline.   Electronic media like TV and the internet is better suited for quickie, shallow news and appeals to people who are in a hurry and just want headlines and a few paragraphs.  Our whole society seems afflicted with ADD.

So if you have a new idea for news and information you could be a hero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Over the long-long term should a utopian take heart with the direction civilisations are heading or does change for the better come from radical new ideas?</i></p>
<p>I think it requires new ideas &#8211;  sometimes radical, sometimes incremental. </p>
<p>Of course the world has lots of new ideas every day &#8211; that&#8217;s why 2008 is different from 2007, which was different from 1997, etc.  Social networking websites and Youtube and iPhones and sheep that make human blood, and machines by Codon that make custom DNA are all recent new ideas that have the potential to change things, possibly for the better.</p>
<p>Journalism is in a lot of trouble these days because the best, most in-depth journalism for a century has been newspaper journalism, but newspapers are in fast decline.   Electronic media like TV and the internet is better suited for quickie, shallow news and appeals to people who are in a hurry and just want headlines and a few paragraphs.  Our whole society seems afflicted with ADD.</p>
<p>So if you have a new idea for news and information you could be a hero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
