<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Auto Industry Bailout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout</link>
	<description>On Point is a live, two-hour morning news-analysis program, produced by WBUR 90.9 and NPR.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:26:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew J. Slaughter 02-04-09 Economist of the Day &#171; Financial Economics Today - Wayne Marr</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-4#comment-10522</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew J. Slaughter 02-04-09 Economist of the Day &#171; Financial Economics Today - Wayne Marr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-10522</guid>
		<description>[...] Listen to Dean Slaughter on National Public Radio’s On Point as he discusses the proposed auto industry bailout. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Listen to Dean Slaughter on National Public Radio’s On Point as he discusses the proposed auto industry bailout. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alyssa A. Lappen &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Three for Chapter 11</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-4#comment-8177</link>
		<dc:creator>Alyssa A. Lappen &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Three for Chapter 11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-8177</guid>
		<description>[...] Not everyone agrees with climbing on the bailout bandwagon. “Let market forces play out,” advises associate dean at Dartmouth&#8217;s Tuck School of Business, Matthew J. Slaughter. “The way to solve that problem is not to lend more money to GM,” agrees investment activist William Ackman. New York Times business reporter Micheline Maynard reminds, “Bankruptcy does not mean liquidation.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Not everyone agrees with climbing on the bailout bandwagon. “Let market forces play out,” advises associate dean at Dartmouth&#8217;s Tuck School of Business, Matthew J. Slaughter. “The way to solve that problem is not to lend more money to GM,” agrees investment activist William Ackman. New York Times business reporter Micheline Maynard reminds, “Bankruptcy does not mean liquidation.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david calabrese</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-4#comment-6839</link>
		<dc:creator>david calabrese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6839</guid>
		<description>GM would never negoitate with their GM labor union, the Ford labor union, and the Chrysler labor union as a block. The congress should not be negoitating with GM, Ford and Chrysler as a block. Each has different problems.

We are told GM will make it with their new electric boutique car for the wealthy? The world&#039;s auto industries are not waiting for the US to figure things out. Mercedes has just announced a C class 4dr, 3500 lb sedan that only puts out 138 g/km. The Prius and new VW golf 2.0 emit less than 140 gm/km and the coming Prius will under 100 gm/km. The Europeans and Japanese are attacking the mileage needs and carbon emission problems with not one, but a slew of new models. GM???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM would never negoitate with their GM labor union, the Ford labor union, and the Chrysler labor union as a block. The congress should not be negoitating with GM, Ford and Chrysler as a block. Each has different problems.</p>
<p>We are told GM will make it with their new electric boutique car for the wealthy? The world&#8217;s auto industries are not waiting for the US to figure things out. Mercedes has just announced a C class 4dr, 3500 lb sedan that only puts out 138 g/km. The Prius and new VW golf 2.0 emit less than 140 gm/km and the coming Prius will under 100 gm/km. The Europeans and Japanese are attacking the mileage needs and carbon emission problems with not one, but a slew of new models. GM???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: globi</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-4#comment-6734</link>
		<dc:creator>globi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6734</guid>
		<description>Has anyone noticed how quiet Iran got, since the oil price dropped?

If the US would introduce a gas tax, it could finance efficient car development and production in Detroit, it could pay for efficiency and renewable energy projects. This would not only create valuable jobs, reduce America&#039;s dependence on foreign oil, improve its trade deficit, but also increase world security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone noticed how quiet Iran got, since the oil price dropped?</p>
<p>If the US would introduce a gas tax, it could finance efficient car development and production in Detroit, it could pay for efficiency and renewable energy projects. This would not only create valuable jobs, reduce America&#8217;s dependence on foreign oil, improve its trade deficit, but also increase world security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-4#comment-6724</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6724</guid>
		<description>No Toyota is a Japanese company they lost about 30% in the market. 

The US auto industry should not be saved, the reason they are failing is not the current economic problem, it goes back to a history of constant failures for over 25 years.
Mismanagement is the culprit. They had the nerve to fly into Washington on their private jets at the cost of over 20k each for the day, and ask for handouts!
Are they kidding? The arrogance is astounding.


This is an interesting read:

Why We Shouldn&#039;t Save GM
Howl
By Nicholas von Hoffman

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20081201/howl2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Toyota is a Japanese company they lost about 30% in the market. </p>
<p>The US auto industry should not be saved, the reason they are failing is not the current economic problem, it goes back to a history of constant failures for over 25 years.<br />
Mismanagement is the culprit. They had the nerve to fly into Washington on their private jets at the cost of over 20k each for the day, and ask for handouts!<br />
Are they kidding? The arrogance is astounding.</p>
<p>This is an interesting read:</p>
<p>Why We Shouldn&#8217;t Save GM<br />
Howl<br />
By Nicholas von Hoffman</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20081201/howl2" rel="nofollow">http://www.thenation.com/doc/20081201/howl2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred W. Bracy</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-4#comment-6609</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred W. Bracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6609</guid>
		<description>It couldn&#039;t be more simple. Why would the Republicans want to see the U.S. Auto industry slip into Chapter 11 reorganization? . . .because it means that Detroit management can finally *rip up* all the prior agreements and commitments they&#039;ve ever made--union contracts, health care benefits and of course retirement plans. It&#039;s all about legacy costs and most importantly -- unions, unions, unions. And once they&#039;ve busted the unions they will have established the greatest legal precedent ever, allowing all of big industry to use this tool should financial hard times ever get *really* hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It couldn&#8217;t be more simple. Why would the Republicans want to see the U.S. Auto industry slip into Chapter 11 reorganization? . . .because it means that Detroit management can finally *rip up* all the prior agreements and commitments they&#8217;ve ever made&#8211;union contracts, health care benefits and of course retirement plans. It&#8217;s all about legacy costs and most importantly &#8212; unions, unions, unions. And once they&#8217;ve busted the unions they will have established the greatest legal precedent ever, allowing all of big industry to use this tool should financial hard times ever get *really* hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Pincumbe</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-4#comment-6508</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Pincumbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6508</guid>
		<description>Excuse me, but where is Toyota in all of this? Are they asking for a bailout, as well? Just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me, but where is Toyota in all of this? Are they asking for a bailout, as well? Just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-3#comment-6427</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6427</guid>
		<description>Who should bail out the Big Three?

We have examples of government action to consider:
	Managed care, wherein physicians spend as much time completing paperwork to justify their professional judgment as they do actually giving care;
	Sarbanes Oxley, wherein companies redeploy significant resources to hiring accountants to examine their records, while still not actually performing the internal audits that just might catch the creative accounting;
	California’s well-intentioned but unnecessary rush to eliminate all asbestos in schools, which robbed resources from a generation of school children and plunged California schools from near the top in the nation to near the bottom in the nation;
	“No Child Left Behind” which redirects valuable teacher time to filling out paperwork instead of grading student compositions and developing lesson plans.
	Airport security, an entire government agency, a virtual explosion in tax costs, that checks our bags at the airport for a minimal improvement in actual security.  Wouldn’t we rather have better healthcare?

Bankruptcy, which forces the industry to actually look within and restructure itself by itself without the props and advice of the government, looks like a more promising means to revitalization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who should bail out the Big Three?</p>
<p>We have examples of government action to consider:<br />
	Managed care, wherein physicians spend as much time completing paperwork to justify their professional judgment as they do actually giving care;<br />
	Sarbanes Oxley, wherein companies redeploy significant resources to hiring accountants to examine their records, while still not actually performing the internal audits that just might catch the creative accounting;<br />
	California’s well-intentioned but unnecessary rush to eliminate all asbestos in schools, which robbed resources from a generation of school children and plunged California schools from near the top in the nation to near the bottom in the nation;<br />
	“No Child Left Behind” which redirects valuable teacher time to filling out paperwork instead of grading student compositions and developing lesson plans.<br />
	Airport security, an entire government agency, a virtual explosion in tax costs, that checks our bags at the airport for a minimal improvement in actual security.  Wouldn’t we rather have better healthcare?</p>
<p>Bankruptcy, which forces the industry to actually look within and restructure itself by itself without the props and advice of the government, looks like a more promising means to revitalization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin Winslow</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-3#comment-6419</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin Winslow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6419</guid>
		<description>I vote for survival of the fittest also. I have watched the american auto industry and the oil industry hold hands all of my life. The only time the ato makers moved toward cleaning up their act for effeciency, was when the oil industry got greedy. The unions run the industries in america and have raped the american tax payers long enough. My only regret is that these problems haven&#039;t exposed the corruption in big industry, unions and our government, sooner. My vote has to go to bankruptcy and cleaning up their own acts. I am fully aware that this will bring on the inevitable sooner, than later, but it is going to happen and as usual, the poor working class, will have to pick up the tab. So let&#039;s quit putting bandaids on a bleeding jugular and see if we can&#039;t re-build this nation like was done after the great depression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for survival of the fittest also. I have watched the american auto industry and the oil industry hold hands all of my life. The only time the ato makers moved toward cleaning up their act for effeciency, was when the oil industry got greedy. The unions run the industries in america and have raped the american tax payers long enough. My only regret is that these problems haven&#8217;t exposed the corruption in big industry, unions and our government, sooner. My vote has to go to bankruptcy and cleaning up their own acts. I am fully aware that this will bring on the inevitable sooner, than later, but it is going to happen and as usual, the poor working class, will have to pick up the tab. So let&#8217;s quit putting bandaids on a bleeding jugular and see if we can&#8217;t re-build this nation like was done after the great depression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amalio Escobar</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-3#comment-6375</link>
		<dc:creator>Amalio Escobar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6375</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t we use the bail out money to help the automakers make the public transportation we need instead of promoting adding more automobiles to the congested roads we have? By the way this also would help to balance the huge trade deficit, improve the air we breathe and give us more time to be with our families instead of being stuck in traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t we use the bail out money to help the automakers make the public transportation we need instead of promoting adding more automobiles to the congested roads we have? By the way this also would help to balance the huge trade deficit, improve the air we breathe and give us more time to be with our families instead of being stuck in traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Franks</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-3#comment-6348</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Franks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6348</guid>
		<description>What the &quot;Big Three&quot; never grasped was how much they ticked off the blue collar class when they closed assembly plants in the U.S., moved the jobs to Mexico and other third world countries paying a pittance in wages and no benefits and then sold the cars in the U.S. as though they had been built in Detroit. Where thay had a U.S. plant and a third world plant producing the same car the U.S. workers were told that the car model just wasn&#039;t selling therefore they had to lay-off the U.S. employees, while in reality, the U.S. plant was used to build the overflow that could not be built at the third world plant. At the same time that they were taking jobs out of this country the Japanese were building assembly plants in this country and providing jobs. The &quot;Big Three&quot; just couldn&#039;t figure out that if people were put out of work here, who is going to buy there foreign produced cars? That is one reason the &quot;foreign&quot; manufacturers all building assembly plants here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the &#8220;Big Three&#8221; never grasped was how much they ticked off the blue collar class when they closed assembly plants in the U.S., moved the jobs to Mexico and other third world countries paying a pittance in wages and no benefits and then sold the cars in the U.S. as though they had been built in Detroit. Where thay had a U.S. plant and a third world plant producing the same car the U.S. workers were told that the car model just wasn&#8217;t selling therefore they had to lay-off the U.S. employees, while in reality, the U.S. plant was used to build the overflow that could not be built at the third world plant. At the same time that they were taking jobs out of this country the Japanese were building assembly plants in this country and providing jobs. The &#8220;Big Three&#8221; just couldn&#8217;t figure out that if people were put out of work here, who is going to buy there foreign produced cars? That is one reason the &#8220;foreign&#8221; manufacturers all building assembly plants here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-3#comment-6345</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6345</guid>
		<description>Good point Ray, very good point.

I don&#039;t squat in my pension fund, it dropped by thousands recently. Who&#039;s bailing me out? And another thing I since I&#039;m now a share holder in AIG I want go on one of those nice expensive weekend getaways they going on with my money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Ray, very good point.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t squat in my pension fund, it dropped by thousands recently. Who&#8217;s bailing me out? And another thing I since I&#8217;m now a share holder in AIG I want go on one of those nice expensive weekend getaways they going on with my money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Yamin</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-3#comment-6344</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Yamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6344</guid>
		<description>Most of the people in this country DON&#039;T have pensions, don&#039;t have platinum healthcare coverage and don&#039;t have the wages of these UAW workers. When you plead for the taxpayer to guarantee these jobs, pensions and healthcare coverage, you are asking the HAVE-NOTS to take care of the HAVES. Is anyone gonna replace people&#039;s 45% losses on their 401k&#039;s like the Pension Benefit Guaranty Fund is going to take care of these private UAW employees? What makes these private citizens more worthy than the rest of us? Government is discriminating when it takes care of one group to the detriment of the rest. Either that, or put ALL of us on the dole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the people in this country DON&#8217;T have pensions, don&#8217;t have platinum healthcare coverage and don&#8217;t have the wages of these UAW workers. When you plead for the taxpayer to guarantee these jobs, pensions and healthcare coverage, you are asking the HAVE-NOTS to take care of the HAVES. Is anyone gonna replace people&#8217;s 45% losses on their 401k&#8217;s like the Pension Benefit Guaranty Fund is going to take care of these private UAW employees? What makes these private citizens more worthy than the rest of us? Government is discriminating when it takes care of one group to the detriment of the rest. Either that, or put ALL of us on the dole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prius Diary Extra &#8212; How Green Should Detroit Be? - Green Inc. Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-3#comment-6283</link>
		<dc:creator>Prius Diary Extra &#8212; How Green Should Detroit Be? - Green Inc. Blog - NYTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6283</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve been interviewed on NPR, Fox, WNYC and other news outlets about the prospects for a bailout, I&#8217;ve been asked, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve been interviewed on NPR, Fox, WNYC and other news outlets about the prospects for a bailout, I&#8217;ve been asked, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-3#comment-6273</link>
		<dc:creator>eric rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6273</guid>
		<description>so,where are the oil companies who are making money hands over fist not helping out their little buddies making the most fuel guzzling vehicles on the planet?  maybe  they feel that they will supply whoever is left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so,where are the oil companies who are making money hands over fist not helping out their little buddies making the most fuel guzzling vehicles on the planet?  maybe  they feel that they will supply whoever is left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-3#comment-6266</link>
		<dc:creator>David Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6266</guid>
		<description>Why not!!! Everybody else is standing in line for a bailout. Our government has tons of money to throw away. Politicians love to buy votes with money, handouts and promises. This whole bailout has sadly become a necessity for survival in our country. Sadly,It will not cure the problem.This is just a bandaide on a monsterous oozing sore of years of irresponsibilty and self-indulgence. The auto industry and its problem: Make gas guzzling monsters to satisfy ego drunken Americans. The old keep up with the Jones&#039; syndrome. Climb the ladder of success!!! Build me a vehicle that impresses people, who cares if it gets 8 mpg. I had a 1970 mustang that got better mileage than a 2008 mustang. Ford had in the early 70&#039;s a carburetor that would produce 45 mpg in a car. That little device was destroyed before it got on the market. Ford makes cars in Europe that get far better mpg than those here in USA. With this information, yes!!! lets bail these poor auto companies out to, are maybe we need some individual bailout money so we can change our habits. I am for keeping Americans working but not for promoting the same old junk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not!!! Everybody else is standing in line for a bailout. Our government has tons of money to throw away. Politicians love to buy votes with money, handouts and promises. This whole bailout has sadly become a necessity for survival in our country. Sadly,It will not cure the problem.This is just a bandaide on a monsterous oozing sore of years of irresponsibilty and self-indulgence. The auto industry and its problem: Make gas guzzling monsters to satisfy ego drunken Americans. The old keep up with the Jones&#8217; syndrome. Climb the ladder of success!!! Build me a vehicle that impresses people, who cares if it gets 8 mpg. I had a 1970 mustang that got better mileage than a 2008 mustang. Ford had in the early 70&#8217;s a carburetor that would produce 45 mpg in a car. That little device was destroyed before it got on the market. Ford makes cars in Europe that get far better mpg than those here in USA. With this information, yes!!! lets bail these poor auto companies out to, are maybe we need some individual bailout money so we can change our habits. I am for keeping Americans working but not for promoting the same old junk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-3#comment-6250</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6250</guid>
		<description>Top Ten reasons the big three should not be bailed out.

1:Ford Pinto.
2:Chevrolet Cavalier.
3:Chevrolet Astro.
4:Ford Taurus.
5:Ford Explorer.
6:Jaguar X-Type.
7:Hummer H2.
8:Toyota Prius.
9:Chrysler Sebring
10:Jeep Compass.


http://www.usnews.com/blogs/flowchart/2008/11/14/10-cars-that-sank-detroit.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top Ten reasons the big three should not be bailed out.</p>
<p>1:Ford Pinto.<br />
2:Chevrolet Cavalier.<br />
3:Chevrolet Astro.<br />
4:Ford Taurus.<br />
5:Ford Explorer.<br />
6:Jaguar X-Type.<br />
7:Hummer H2.<br />
8:Toyota Prius.<br />
9:Chrysler Sebring<br />
10:Jeep Compass.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usnews.com/blogs/flowchart/2008/11/14/10-cars-that-sank-detroit.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.usnews.com/blogs/flowchart/2008/11/14/10-cars-that-sank-detroit.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-3#comment-6245</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6245</guid>
		<description>Americans are quick to abandon their principles such as personal freedoms and free market capitalism whenever they are told by the bosses that there is some kind of a crisis going on. Healthcare for the population that would be in tens of billions is always a problem, but bail-outs of capitalists costing hundreds of billions is not a problem because we are in the crisis. Improving domestic infrustruture is a no-no because we are against big government spending, but sinking hundreds of billions into sand thousands of miles away is fine &#039;cause, you know, we are at war. This friggin&#039; gullible population deserves exactly what&#039;s coming to it. 

I am against any of these bailouts. It is better to spend government money directly to lend to businesses and consumers and put people to work on public projects than throw money at capitalists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans are quick to abandon their principles such as personal freedoms and free market capitalism whenever they are told by the bosses that there is some kind of a crisis going on. Healthcare for the population that would be in tens of billions is always a problem, but bail-outs of capitalists costing hundreds of billions is not a problem because we are in the crisis. Improving domestic infrustruture is a no-no because we are against big government spending, but sinking hundreds of billions into sand thousands of miles away is fine &#8217;cause, you know, we are at war. This friggin&#8217; gullible population deserves exactly what&#8217;s coming to it. </p>
<p>I am against any of these bailouts. It is better to spend government money directly to lend to businesses and consumers and put people to work on public projects than throw money at capitalists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve banicki</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-3#comment-6241</link>
		<dc:creator>steve banicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6241</guid>
		<description>The UAW shares some of the blame, with two other culprits, regarding the problems facing the domestic auto industry. Our politicians and the executives overseeing these large corporations also failed in doing their jobs over the last 40-years and this is why the auto companies deserve to be bailed out.....................

If, and only if, the bail out gives them at least two years of survival in order to solve their problems.

When Adam Smith talked about “rational self interest” and competitive markets in his book Wealth of Nations, he envisioned many consumers interested in buying goods and services from many producers. Our politicians allowed the competitive automobile market to become an oligopolistic market in the ‘50’s and ‘60’s instead of a free market.

This oligopolistic market allowed the auto executives either to ignore the coming onslaught of foreign competition or not even to think about it. They knew their “competitors’ at the other two auto companies would match any conspiratory agreement that was reached with the UAW. This occurred because there was no foreign competition to worry about at the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UAW shares some of the blame, with two other culprits, regarding the problems facing the domestic auto industry. Our politicians and the executives overseeing these large corporations also failed in doing their jobs over the last 40-years and this is why the auto companies deserve to be bailed out&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>If, and only if, the bail out gives them at least two years of survival in order to solve their problems.</p>
<p>When Adam Smith talked about “rational self interest” and competitive markets in his book Wealth of Nations, he envisioned many consumers interested in buying goods and services from many producers. Our politicians allowed the competitive automobile market to become an oligopolistic market in the ‘50’s and ‘60’s instead of a free market.</p>
<p>This oligopolistic market allowed the auto executives either to ignore the coming onslaught of foreign competition or not even to think about it. They knew their “competitors’ at the other two auto companies would match any conspiratory agreement that was reached with the UAW. This occurred because there was no foreign competition to worry about at the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/11/auto-industry-bailout/comment-page-3#comment-6233</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 04:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=12949#comment-6233</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting that Dingell&#039;s wife is a senior executive at General Motors.

Peter you make some good arguments for why the auto companies should be bailed out.

However they dug this hole. Our lack of a national health care system did not help as that is one expense that has not helped them compete with Japanese companies.

If you compare the the price of a night in a hospital in Japan versus this country it&#039;s pretty easy to see how these cost eat into this industries ability to compete.

But...they still made bad decisions , and did so for decades.  

There is no easy answer. I think they will get the bailout, they will also still be filing for bankruptcy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that Dingell&#8217;s wife is a senior executive at General Motors.</p>
<p>Peter you make some good arguments for why the auto companies should be bailed out.</p>
<p>However they dug this hole. Our lack of a national health care system did not help as that is one expense that has not helped them compete with Japanese companies.</p>
<p>If you compare the the price of a night in a hospital in Japan versus this country it&#8217;s pretty easy to see how these cost eat into this industries ability to compete.</p>
<p>But&#8230;they still made bad decisions , and did so for decades.  </p>
<p>There is no easy answer. I think they will get the bailout, they will also still be filing for bankruptcy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
