<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rebuilding America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america</link>
	<description>On Point is a live, two-hour morning news-analysis program, produced by WBUR 90.9 and NPR.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:12:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: erica blair</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7927</link>
		<dc:creator>erica blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7927</guid>
		<description>Follow the $: 

1. Military industries create wars and use funds that should be appropriated to national/municipal projects e.g. buildings (schools, hospitals, etc.), roadways, railways, airports, etc.

2. MOXXON does not want you riding anything but your SUV/mini van and they have the means to coerce U.S. auto corporations to keep fuel efficiency low and keep them selling you SUVs and mini vans.

3. Our soldiers have been sacrificed in Mesopotamia to take control the huge proven petroleum reserves there, to continue the use of hydrocarbon energy and create wealth for the military industrialists .

4. The rape of M1 by Wall St. &quot;investment&quot; con artists has been designed to &quot;fleece the flock,&quot; which in turn causes us to borrow the money to replace what they stole which will create rampant inflation and a financial panic, which in turn creates a cowering flock (you &amp; I) unable to revolt against the injustice and theft of our money supply, which btw, is just worthless paper, thanks to the Federal Reserve Bank (a private corporation).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow the $: </p>
<p>1. Military industries create wars and use funds that should be appropriated to national/municipal projects e.g. buildings (schools, hospitals, etc.), roadways, railways, airports, etc.</p>
<p>2. MOXXON does not want you riding anything but your SUV/mini van and they have the means to coerce U.S. auto corporations to keep fuel efficiency low and keep them selling you SUVs and mini vans.</p>
<p>3. Our soldiers have been sacrificed in Mesopotamia to take control the huge proven petroleum reserves there, to continue the use of hydrocarbon energy and create wealth for the military industrialists .</p>
<p>4. The rape of M1 by Wall St. &#8220;investment&#8221; con artists has been designed to &#8220;fleece the flock,&#8221; which in turn causes us to borrow the money to replace what they stole which will create rampant inflation and a financial panic, which in turn creates a cowering flock (you &amp; I) unable to revolt against the injustice and theft of our money supply, which btw, is just worthless paper, thanks to the Federal Reserve Bank (a private corporation).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Foam v. The Latte &#8211; The Politics of Scrabble</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7786</link>
		<dc:creator>The Foam v. The Latte &#8211; The Politics of Scrabble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7786</guid>
		<description>[...] listening to On Point&#8217;s December 4 show on American infrastructure, I was reminded of a comment in the tet-a-tet between the now infamous [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] listening to On Point&#8217;s December 4 show on American infrastructure, I was reminded of a comment in the tet-a-tet between the now infamous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Glassmire</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7734</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Glassmire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7734</guid>
		<description>Excellent program and an essential topic at just the right time. So why was it cut short? On WAMU in Washington, DC the program was approximately 30 minutes long (not the hour long show it should be). The remaining half hour was filled in with music? What happened?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent program and an essential topic at just the right time. So why was it cut short? On WAMU in Washington, DC the program was approximately 30 minutes long (not the hour long show it should be). The remaining half hour was filled in with music? What happened?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth Barkan</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7733</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Barkan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7733</guid>
		<description>Whatever kind of infrastructure we will eventually decide to build and/or spend money on, I would really like to see an emphasis put on universal design in the structuring - people with disabilities and the growing baby boomer population deserve to have buildings, roads, and various other public services that are accessible to them as well as the able-bodied community. Instead of putting luxury boxes on the U of Michigan Stadium, it would have been more beneficial to put in federally mandated accessible seats. Even some of the NEW buildings being put up with federally regulated money on our campus are not accessible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever kind of infrastructure we will eventually decide to build and/or spend money on, I would really like to see an emphasis put on universal design in the structuring &#8211; people with disabilities and the growing baby boomer population deserve to have buildings, roads, and various other public services that are accessible to them as well as the able-bodied community. Instead of putting luxury boxes on the U of Michigan Stadium, it would have been more beneficial to put in federally mandated accessible seats. Even some of the NEW buildings being put up with federally regulated money on our campus are not accessible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel watson</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7726</link>
		<dc:creator>joel watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7726</guid>
		<description>Infrastructure projects, whether they be roads, bridges, rails, greenways, etc., should be restricted to those areas where the project will reduce unemployment.  States who want money for projects that will cost premium prices because of a shortage of labor, materials, bidders, etc. should pay the difference between normal charges for materials and labor and the premium charges.  In addition, states should be required to have sufficient revenue staff to maximize collection of state income,sales and business taxes. Federal taxpayer funds should not subsidize an inefficient state revenue collection system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Infrastructure projects, whether they be roads, bridges, rails, greenways, etc., should be restricted to those areas where the project will reduce unemployment.  States who want money for projects that will cost premium prices because of a shortage of labor, materials, bidders, etc. should pay the difference between normal charges for materials and labor and the premium charges.  In addition, states should be required to have sufficient revenue staff to maximize collection of state income,sales and business taxes. Federal taxpayer funds should not subsidize an inefficient state revenue collection system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digdug</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7725</link>
		<dc:creator>Digdug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7725</guid>
		<description>There was much discussion on the program about moving us into the 21-st century.  How about a bolder move, and just bringing us up to the 20-th century: let&#039;s finally adopt the metric system.  It is the standard of measurement that the entire world adopted last century.  We&#039;re the only ones left behind in the dubious company of two other laggards: Liberia and Myanmar.  The Federal government should have mandate the exclusive use of metric in the upcoming infrastructure projects.  As part of the infrastructure improvements, all roads and speed limits should be relabeled in km and km/h respectively.  Treat it as a one time upgrade that finally allows us to catch up with the rest of the world.  And about the inevitable argument that this will be expensive: a mandated conversion will bring innumerable jobs, along with generating heretofore lost business with wolrdwide customers.  Many foreign firms steer clear of the US because we refuse to work in metric.  Similarly, many domestic firms (like Boeing) force the oursourced precision work to be done in our medieval measurements, which leads to countless errors.  Witness the lates foibles of the Dreamliner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was much discussion on the program about moving us into the 21-st century.  How about a bolder move, and just bringing us up to the 20-th century: let&#8217;s finally adopt the metric system.  It is the standard of measurement that the entire world adopted last century.  We&#8217;re the only ones left behind in the dubious company of two other laggards: Liberia and Myanmar.  The Federal government should have mandate the exclusive use of metric in the upcoming infrastructure projects.  As part of the infrastructure improvements, all roads and speed limits should be relabeled in km and km/h respectively.  Treat it as a one time upgrade that finally allows us to catch up with the rest of the world.  And about the inevitable argument that this will be expensive: a mandated conversion will bring innumerable jobs, along with generating heretofore lost business with wolrdwide customers.  Many foreign firms steer clear of the US because we refuse to work in metric.  Similarly, many domestic firms (like Boeing) force the oursourced precision work to be done in our medieval measurements, which leads to countless errors.  Witness the lates foibles of the Dreamliner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7715</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7715</guid>
		<description>I agree with the commenters above that focus on rural needs like complete cell phone coverage and improved broadband access is really necessary.  I come from a rural background but I&#039;m temporarily living abroad in Turkey, a still-developing country, and people here are amazed when I tell them there are places in the US (even in my home state of NY) where mobile phones don&#039;t work and people are using dialup for internet access.  Infrastructure is not just roads - it&#039;s &quot;virtual roads&quot; as well.  Please think about this for a future show topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the commenters above that focus on rural needs like complete cell phone coverage and improved broadband access is really necessary.  I come from a rural background but I&#8217;m temporarily living abroad in Turkey, a still-developing country, and people here are amazed when I tell them there are places in the US (even in my home state of NY) where mobile phones don&#8217;t work and people are using dialup for internet access.  Infrastructure is not just roads &#8211; it&#8217;s &#8220;virtual roads&#8221; as well.  Please think about this for a future show topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PW</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7709</link>
		<dc:creator>PW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7709</guid>
		<description>In response to Peter McLyman in VT, I live in a rural area in West Texas where there has been a push during the past decade or more to give much greater higher education opportunities to rural students.  Locally, a small campus is being built this minute.  It&#039;s nothing like what I&#039;ve seen in a college -- as a New Englander, I&#039;m used to the sprawling campuses of, say, Harvard and Smith.  This is nothing more than a series of small buildings with state-of-the-art computer connections to classes in the three major universities around the state + one well-regarded Austin community college. These institutions  sponsor this effort jointly. One has to wonder how much better it would be if we had state-of-the-art broadband service throughout the rural counties this campus serves. 

The implications of this kind of home-based education becoming available more widely (with, of course, occasional trips to the various university campuses) at both undergraduate and graduate levels are enormous for all of us living here, not just in terms of jobs for us and opportunities for our kids, but in terms of the opening of a blue highway rural area to multilevel, readily accessible educational and cultural opportunities that would be difficult for many to have access to otherwise.  This is probably being done in other rural areas but it&#039;s the first time I&#039;ve seen it up close and friendly. I&#039;m impressed by what this joint effort has achieved so far as well as by its potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Peter McLyman in VT, I live in a rural area in West Texas where there has been a push during the past decade or more to give much greater higher education opportunities to rural students.  Locally, a small campus is being built this minute.  It&#8217;s nothing like what I&#8217;ve seen in a college &#8212; as a New Englander, I&#8217;m used to the sprawling campuses of, say, Harvard and Smith.  This is nothing more than a series of small buildings with state-of-the-art computer connections to classes in the three major universities around the state + one well-regarded Austin community college. These institutions  sponsor this effort jointly. One has to wonder how much better it would be if we had state-of-the-art broadband service throughout the rural counties this campus serves. </p>
<p>The implications of this kind of home-based education becoming available more widely (with, of course, occasional trips to the various university campuses) at both undergraduate and graduate levels are enormous for all of us living here, not just in terms of jobs for us and opportunities for our kids, but in terms of the opening of a blue highway rural area to multilevel, readily accessible educational and cultural opportunities that would be difficult for many to have access to otherwise.  This is probably being done in other rural areas but it&#8217;s the first time I&#8217;ve seen it up close and friendly. I&#8217;m impressed by what this joint effort has achieved so far as well as by its potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. David Stephenson</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7706</link>
		<dc:creator>W. David Stephenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7706</guid>
		<description>The construction industry is perhaps &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/4pmopc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the most behind-the-times one in the US&lt;/a&gt;, so business as usual won&#039;t make it an effective stimulus nor can we afford this waste.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/6zalaa&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;In a recent op-ed in Engineering News Record,&lt;/a&gt; I argued that a &quot;Bridge 2.0 approach, in which we&#039;d use Web 2.0 tools such as wikis and RSS feeds could dramatically reduce the amount of time needed for the regulatory processes (while actually increasing opportunities for public participation in environmental reviews, etc.!), improve scheduling, and make the process transparent, to rebuild public faith in government. It&#039;s an approach that I believe is essential given the need to simultaneously create jobs quickly while reducing spending.
W. David Stephenson
Stephenson Strategies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The construction industry is perhaps <a href="http://tinyurl.com/4pmopc" rel="nofollow">the most behind-the-times one in the US</a>, so business as usual won&#8217;t make it an effective stimulus nor can we afford this waste.</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/6zalaa" rel="nofollow">In a recent op-ed in Engineering News Record,</a> I argued that a &#8220;Bridge 2.0 approach, in which we&#8217;d use Web 2.0 tools such as wikis and RSS feeds could dramatically reduce the amount of time needed for the regulatory processes (while actually increasing opportunities for public participation in environmental reviews, etc.!), improve scheduling, and make the process transparent, to rebuild public faith in government. It&#8217;s an approach that I believe is essential given the need to simultaneously create jobs quickly while reducing spending.<br />
W. David Stephenson<br />
Stephenson Strategies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7701</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7701</guid>
		<description>I agree with Obama&#039;s comments regarding the long-term approach to building a sustainable US future and economy. He would inspire many if he began at the White House creating a completely sustainable complex. 

For example, in an affluant community south of Boston, with the aid of a wind turbine, solar panels, and geothermic wells there are homes going completely self sustainable and nearly carbon-free. Although extremely expensive at the moment, as we have seen with other technological breakthroughs, a greater investment into these ideals will equate to eventual lower costs making this and similar technology more of a viable option for both residential and commercial applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Obama&#8217;s comments regarding the long-term approach to building a sustainable US future and economy. He would inspire many if he began at the White House creating a completely sustainable complex. </p>
<p>For example, in an affluant community south of Boston, with the aid of a wind turbine, solar panels, and geothermic wells there are homes going completely self sustainable and nearly carbon-free. Although extremely expensive at the moment, as we have seen with other technological breakthroughs, a greater investment into these ideals will equate to eventual lower costs making this and similar technology more of a viable option for both residential and commercial applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary tomko</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7688</link>
		<dc:creator>gary tomko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7688</guid>
		<description>There may be good intentions by Obama.  I&#039;ll stick to the facts, moneys will be appropriated by congress, maybe I&#039;m missing something, but those who thinks this money will be used wisely are seriously deluding themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There may be good intentions by Obama.  I&#8217;ll stick to the facts, moneys will be appropriated by congress, maybe I&#8217;m missing something, but those who thinks this money will be used wisely are seriously deluding themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter McLyman</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7684</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter McLyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7684</guid>
		<description>Tom,

Listening to this very important discussion I noticed that the focus of the infrustucture was in urban areas.  Rual America need to be caught up and brought into this century.  High Speed internet to every house in America; Cell phone coverage reaching deep in to the woods, an options for rual commuters to get to work.

Living in a rual state, Vermont, I would like to know if there are conversations about infrustucture spending in rual America.

Peter McLyman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>Listening to this very important discussion I noticed that the focus of the infrustucture was in urban areas.  Rual America need to be caught up and brought into this century.  High Speed internet to every house in America; Cell phone coverage reaching deep in to the woods, an options for rual commuters to get to work.</p>
<p>Living in a rual state, Vermont, I would like to know if there are conversations about infrustucture spending in rual America.</p>
<p>Peter McLyman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Mandell</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7680</link>
		<dc:creator>George Mandell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7680</guid>
		<description>So what we are talking about is how best to reshape government spending to achieve domestic priorities. Such goals are over-due. The roughly $1 Trillion spent on the war in Iraq could have been spent to jump-start our economy and help our country traverse the gap to a New Energy Age, should we have had a different group of policymakers in charge in Washington. 

  Some would argue that FDR did not rebuild the US economy after The Great Depression by use of his policies of intervention and government spending. But most will agree that FDR managed to keep the US afloat until The Next Great Task of WWII arrived -- FDR got the country to the launchpad. It was WWII and the process of building manufacturing capacity that retooled the US economy and transformed it into the economic and military power it became.

 In my view the Next Great Task is to help the US cross the bridges necessary to greet a New Energy Age while protecting and repairing the environment and taking care of peoples throughout the globe -- plenty of potential jobs there. Increasing funding to states and local authorities is the best way to concentrate on domestic priorities and develop the multiple models we will need to find success. So we need to jump-start the economy and rebuild infrastructure along these lines.

 I have proposed US tax policy changes to achieve more funding for states and local authorities in my October 2008 report, &quot;Reshaping Government Spending&quot;. In most state and local governments, the wheels are coming off the bus because of unfunded domestic needs. The cohesiveness of communities is part of the process of rebuilding infrastructure, and neglect is causing increasing damage to a basic micro-economic building block. President Elect Obama&#039;s team seems to be searching for a way to deliver on this agenda. My policy suggestions provide an avenue to reach their goals. Please visit my website and comment. 

George
Milton, Massachusetts
Gemand Consulting LLC
www.GemandConsulting.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what we are talking about is how best to reshape government spending to achieve domestic priorities. Such goals are over-due. The roughly $1 Trillion spent on the war in Iraq could have been spent to jump-start our economy and help our country traverse the gap to a New Energy Age, should we have had a different group of policymakers in charge in Washington. </p>
<p>  Some would argue that FDR did not rebuild the US economy after The Great Depression by use of his policies of intervention and government spending. But most will agree that FDR managed to keep the US afloat until The Next Great Task of WWII arrived &#8212; FDR got the country to the launchpad. It was WWII and the process of building manufacturing capacity that retooled the US economy and transformed it into the economic and military power it became.</p>
<p> In my view the Next Great Task is to help the US cross the bridges necessary to greet a New Energy Age while protecting and repairing the environment and taking care of peoples throughout the globe &#8212; plenty of potential jobs there. Increasing funding to states and local authorities is the best way to concentrate on domestic priorities and develop the multiple models we will need to find success. So we need to jump-start the economy and rebuild infrastructure along these lines.</p>
<p> I have proposed US tax policy changes to achieve more funding for states and local authorities in my October 2008 report, &#8220;Reshaping Government Spending&#8221;. In most state and local governments, the wheels are coming off the bus because of unfunded domestic needs. The cohesiveness of communities is part of the process of rebuilding infrastructure, and neglect is causing increasing damage to a basic micro-economic building block. President Elect Obama&#8217;s team seems to be searching for a way to deliver on this agenda. My policy suggestions provide an avenue to reach their goals. Please visit my website and comment. </p>
<p>George<br />
Milton, Massachusetts<br />
Gemand Consulting LLC<br />
<a href="http://www.GemandConsulting.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.GemandConsulting.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7679</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7679</guid>
		<description>Pakistan is the hot bed of Jihadi Terror. Whether it was 9/11, or Nuclear leak to Iran, war in Afghanisatan, it has been aiding and abetting terrorism. The world has been fooled by the double speak of its government and Miltary. ISI is the root of global terrorism. When will the world see the truth and get rid off the root cause of terrorism! These people also killed Daniel Pearl a guy who was also on the trail of terrorists who were plotting 9/11!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pakistan is the hot bed of Jihadi Terror. Whether it was 9/11, or Nuclear leak to Iran, war in Afghanisatan, it has been aiding and abetting terrorism. The world has been fooled by the double speak of its government and Miltary. ISI is the root of global terrorism. When will the world see the truth and get rid off the root cause of terrorism! These people also killed Daniel Pearl a guy who was also on the trail of terrorists who were plotting 9/11!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hebert</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7678</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7678</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s NO SENSE in repairing or improving our existing infrastructure if we merely perpetuate America&#039;s love affair with the gas-guzzling, or biofuel-guzzling  single-family automobile -- no matter HOW &quot;green&quot; we make the private car. 

To do that, we need to think beyond &quot;green&quot; -- we need to give the American consumer reason and incentive to CONSERVE resources, so that we all support rather than scoff at, or more likely fight, new initiatives.

The best, simplest and smartest way to do that is to raise the federal gasoline tax, which currently is a token 18.4 PENNIES. And we need to raise it now as plummeting gas prices will barely be noticed by the average driver. If this proves too great a jolt to the American psyche, a tax increase could be phased in, to give us this nation the shot across the bow and the wake-up call we all desperately seem to need. But whatever the plan, we need to start the process now or suffer the consequences of postponing the inevitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s NO SENSE in repairing or improving our existing infrastructure if we merely perpetuate America&#8217;s love affair with the gas-guzzling, or biofuel-guzzling  single-family automobile &#8212; no matter HOW &#8220;green&#8221; we make the private car. </p>
<p>To do that, we need to think beyond &#8220;green&#8221; &#8212; we need to give the American consumer reason and incentive to CONSERVE resources, so that we all support rather than scoff at, or more likely fight, new initiatives.</p>
<p>The best, simplest and smartest way to do that is to raise the federal gasoline tax, which currently is a token 18.4 PENNIES. And we need to raise it now as plummeting gas prices will barely be noticed by the average driver. If this proves too great a jolt to the American psyche, a tax increase could be phased in, to give us this nation the shot across the bow and the wake-up call we all desperately seem to need. But whatever the plan, we need to start the process now or suffer the consequences of postponing the inevitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7677</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7677</guid>
		<description>There are obvious immediate needs that America has, but even the short term plans need to keep a framework of long term goals in mind. Does anyone know what that is or should be? More importantly, how will our government implement it all effectively and efficiently? Who gets to decide and who should?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are obvious immediate needs that America has, but even the short term plans need to keep a framework of long term goals in mind. Does anyone know what that is or should be? More importantly, how will our government implement it all effectively and efficiently? Who gets to decide and who should?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne Jastatt</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7676</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Jastatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7676</guid>
		<description>I live in Vermont, where there is high unemployment yet the people and resources to support growth in green energy. Should the government focus on creating projects in the areas need jobs most? What if other areas are better suited for these projects, yet already have an ample supply of jobs? How should the government best allocate these projects?

Thank you,

Joanne Jastatt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in Vermont, where there is high unemployment yet the people and resources to support growth in green energy. Should the government focus on creating projects in the areas need jobs most? What if other areas are better suited for these projects, yet already have an ample supply of jobs? How should the government best allocate these projects?</p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>Joanne Jastatt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Agee</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7675</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Agee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7675</guid>
		<description>May I suggest that President-elect Obama consider creating a Department of Sustainability that could look at the interconnectedness of all systems from energy to water, transportation,  infrastructure, and food production? Tom Ashbrook&#039;s excellent interview with  Michael Pollan brought up the point about FOOD as an issue that must be addressed in terms of the whole energy picture. We must look at federal policies that promote maximum production of commodity crops, not only because of the huge fossil fuel use it entails, but if we fix that, it will also have a positive impact on longterm medical costs and preventive healthcare.

Thanks for your excellent program,

Mary Agee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I suggest that President-elect Obama consider creating a Department of Sustainability that could look at the interconnectedness of all systems from energy to water, transportation,  infrastructure, and food production? Tom Ashbrook&#8217;s excellent interview with  Michael Pollan brought up the point about FOOD as an issue that must be addressed in terms of the whole energy picture. We must look at federal policies that promote maximum production of commodity crops, not only because of the huge fossil fuel use it entails, but if we fix that, it will also have a positive impact on longterm medical costs and preventive healthcare.</p>
<p>Thanks for your excellent program,</p>
<p>Mary Agee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Kushwaha</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7674</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Kushwaha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7674</guid>
		<description>Infrastructure in XX-th century is not the same thing as it is in XXI-st century.  Hence, not only roads, bridges and traditional mortar and bricks are the areas of infrastructure development, but broadband access is a lot more efficacious in generating higher returns in the economy and significantly lower the environmental impact  of this economic activity.  I was very surprised not to hear any discussion of this on your show...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Infrastructure in XX-th century is not the same thing as it is in XXI-st century.  Hence, not only roads, bridges and traditional mortar and bricks are the areas of infrastructure development, but broadband access is a lot more efficacious in generating higher returns in the economy and significantly lower the environmental impact  of this economic activity.  I was very surprised not to hear any discussion of this on your show&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane M</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2008/12/rebuilding-america/comment-page-1#comment-7673</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=13256#comment-7673</guid>
		<description>It seems that there is much more concern about spending on infrastructure programs that would put people to work than there was about spending billions in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Too much hypocrisy on the part of many in Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that there is much more concern about spending on infrastructure programs that would put people to work than there was about spending billions in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Too much hypocrisy on the part of many in Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
