<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are the Banks Running America?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america</link>
	<description>On Point is a live, two-hour morning news-analysis program, produced by WBUR 90.9 and NPR.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:48:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-2#comment-14584</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14584</guid>
		<description>***Read Robert Scheer’s article.****

I did, and I don&#039;t totally agreed  with his article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>***Read Robert Scheer’s article.****</p>
<p>I did, and I don&#8217;t totally agreed  with his article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffe</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-2#comment-14147</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14147</guid>
		<description>Robert Reich would have been a better choice than Summers.
Bottom line Obama is a centrist not a progressive.
He wont take on the corporations or deal with health care the way it needs to be dealt with. You watch, 4 years from now we will have the same dysfunctional health care market in which people die from lack of insurance and go bankrupt from the bills generated from illness.

He is listening to Summers how is giving all the wrong advice on hoe to deal with wall street and the banks.

Read Robert Scheer’s article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Reich would have been a better choice than Summers.<br />
Bottom line Obama is a centrist not a progressive.<br />
He wont take on the corporations or deal with health care the way it needs to be dealt with. You watch, 4 years from now we will have the same dysfunctional health care market in which people die from lack of insurance and go bankrupt from the bills generated from illness.</p>
<p>He is listening to Summers how is giving all the wrong advice on hoe to deal with wall street and the banks.</p>
<p>Read Robert Scheer’s article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-2#comment-14144</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14144</guid>
		<description>Jeffe,

Whom do you think he should have appointed for all the positions that you don&#039;t agree with?

Again, patience and wisdom go together, like Calcium and Vitamin D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffe,</p>
<p>Whom do you think he should have appointed for all the positions that you don&#8217;t agree with?</p>
<p>Again, patience and wisdom go together, like Calcium and Vitamin D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffe</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-2#comment-14137</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14137</guid>
		<description>Your right I should have voted for Nader, and I almost did. I admit I was caught up in all prose that Obama is so good at. It remains to be seen if he will be a great president, I think he will be a good one in relation to recent history. However if he and congress do not completely redo our health care system from the bottom we as a nation are doomed to keep 45 million with no coverage and another 40 million more with coverage so bad as to be useless in a medical emergency.  

I know Obama never promised a single payer system, however he did promise to fix the health care mess. He has also said that single payer is of the table recently. Wen during the campaign when asked about single payer he was more inclined to say he would look at all options.

Of course fools like me read this as a maybe or a yes.

We can sit at our desks and post and counter-post all day long. The issues as I see them, and most progressives is that Obama has set himslef up for a huge failure on two fronts. One is health care and the other as we can see is the economy. 

Summers and Geitner were, are the wrong picks for this crisis.

Read today&#039;s Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/02/AR2009040203227.html?wprss=rss_print</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your right I should have voted for Nader, and I almost did. I admit I was caught up in all prose that Obama is so good at. It remains to be seen if he will be a great president, I think he will be a good one in relation to recent history. However if he and congress do not completely redo our health care system from the bottom we as a nation are doomed to keep 45 million with no coverage and another 40 million more with coverage so bad as to be useless in a medical emergency.  </p>
<p>I know Obama never promised a single payer system, however he did promise to fix the health care mess. He has also said that single payer is of the table recently. Wen during the campaign when asked about single payer he was more inclined to say he would look at all options.</p>
<p>Of course fools like me read this as a maybe or a yes.</p>
<p>We can sit at our desks and post and counter-post all day long. The issues as I see them, and most progressives is that Obama has set himslef up for a huge failure on two fronts. One is health care and the other as we can see is the economy. </p>
<p>Summers and Geitner were, are the wrong picks for this crisis.</p>
<p>Read today&#8217;s Washington Post:<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/02/AR2009040203227.html?wprss=rss_print" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/02/AR2009040203227.html?wprss=rss_print</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millard-fillmore</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-2#comment-14117</link>
		<dc:creator>millard-fillmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 02:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14117</guid>
		<description>jeffe, single payer health-care? When did the Democrats ever have that on their agenda/platform, or when did Obama ever mention (while campaigning) that he&#039;d even consider it as an option? You should&#039;ve voted for the Greens or Nader - assuming you&#039;re in MA, it wouldn&#039;t have affected Obama&#039;s victory at all.

We need to start voting for those who reflect our views, instead of this disconnect/dissonance between our views and who we vote for. Some consistency and alignment between thoughts and actions will go ways to change this world for the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeffe, single payer health-care? When did the Democrats ever have that on their agenda/platform, or when did Obama ever mention (while campaigning) that he&#8217;d even consider it as an option? You should&#8217;ve voted for the Greens or Nader &#8211; assuming you&#8217;re in MA, it wouldn&#8217;t have affected Obama&#8217;s victory at all.</p>
<p>We need to start voting for those who reflect our views, instead of this disconnect/dissonance between our views and who we vote for. Some consistency and alignment between thoughts and actions will go ways to change this world for the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffe</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-2#comment-14109</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14109</guid>
		<description>Rachel I&#039;m basing my ideas about Obama on his actions.
He has appointed the worst people to run the economy in this time of crisis. He is expanding the war in Afghanistan and just wait and see, he will leave a substantial amount of troops in Iraq.

Insulting me for having an opinion shows me that your kind of needing some wisdom yourself, grow up.

I voted for Obama because I thought he was a progressive who would work hard to change this countries health care debacle. He is not even going to deal with it. Single payer is not even being discussed. They will not get it solved. 

His Treasury Department has not been cooperating with Elizabeth Warren&#039;s efforts to oversee the project of investigating the financial collapse. 

I voted for him because I thought he would work to bring back some kind of regulatory sensibility to our financial system. 

Did you read Robert Scheer’s article? Are so blinded by your zeal that your going to be saying this mantra over and over again? It&#039;s only been 4 months give him a chance. When we get to 18 months and we have a larger mess then we have now and your still telling people to &quot;believe in him&quot; what then?  

I&#039;m not asking him to move mountains, I&#039;m only asking him to hire the right people for the job.

Lilya I never said I like Richard Halbrook, in fact he is arrogant and probably the wrong man for the job.
I was only trying to point out that most of these people are dirty and up to their waist in cow poo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel I&#8217;m basing my ideas about Obama on his actions.<br />
He has appointed the worst people to run the economy in this time of crisis. He is expanding the war in Afghanistan and just wait and see, he will leave a substantial amount of troops in Iraq.</p>
<p>Insulting me for having an opinion shows me that your kind of needing some wisdom yourself, grow up.</p>
<p>I voted for Obama because I thought he was a progressive who would work hard to change this countries health care debacle. He is not even going to deal with it. Single payer is not even being discussed. They will not get it solved. </p>
<p>His Treasury Department has not been cooperating with Elizabeth Warren&#8217;s efforts to oversee the project of investigating the financial collapse. </p>
<p>I voted for him because I thought he would work to bring back some kind of regulatory sensibility to our financial system. </p>
<p>Did you read Robert Scheer’s article? Are so blinded by your zeal that your going to be saying this mantra over and over again? It&#8217;s only been 4 months give him a chance. When we get to 18 months and we have a larger mess then we have now and your still telling people to &#8220;believe in him&#8221; what then?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not asking him to move mountains, I&#8217;m only asking him to hire the right people for the job.</p>
<p>Lilya I never said I like Richard Halbrook, in fact he is arrogant and probably the wrong man for the job.<br />
I was only trying to point out that most of these people are dirty and up to their waist in cow poo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-2#comment-14073</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14073</guid>
		<description>Correction----

so please have some “wisdom” like Obama possesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction&#8212;-</p>
<p>so please have some “wisdom” like Obama possesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-2#comment-14072</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14072</guid>
		<description>****Lilya your still drinking the Obama kool-aid.
I voted for him and I believed in all the eloquent rhetoric that he is so good at. However he is a centrist and not a progressive as I mistakenly thought.****

You sound just like the product of this American society, NO PATIENCE, FAST TURN AROUND FROFIT!    People like you, saying &quot;well, I also voted for him&quot;, sound like you did him a favor to do &quot;everything&quot; based on your agenda.  But you can&#039;t see a bigger picture, which he has done A LOT since he took office.

You imagine he will just go into white house to sweep every bad things away overnight, without considering all the risk and opponents force pulling from all directions.   He is trying very hard to battle this &quot;deep rooted&quot; problem, people like you judging his work so early are BLIND.  He is in the Washington &quot;jungle&quot;, it is so naive not to see he also has to play their games at times to get things done.

Obama use a really good analogy for what he&#039;s trying to do ----- it is a OCEAN FREIGHT LINER, you don&#039;t turn it around instantly, but it is geared toward the right direction, so please have some &quot;wisdom&quot; like Obama processes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>****Lilya your still drinking the Obama kool-aid.<br />
I voted for him and I believed in all the eloquent rhetoric that he is so good at. However he is a centrist and not a progressive as I mistakenly thought.****</p>
<p>You sound just like the product of this American society, NO PATIENCE, FAST TURN AROUND FROFIT!    People like you, saying &#8220;well, I also voted for him&#8221;, sound like you did him a favor to do &#8220;everything&#8221; based on your agenda.  But you can&#8217;t see a bigger picture, which he has done A LOT since he took office.</p>
<p>You imagine he will just go into white house to sweep every bad things away overnight, without considering all the risk and opponents force pulling from all directions.   He is trying very hard to battle this &#8220;deep rooted&#8221; problem, people like you judging his work so early are BLIND.  He is in the Washington &#8220;jungle&#8221;, it is so naive not to see he also has to play their games at times to get things done.</p>
<p>Obama use a really good analogy for what he&#8217;s trying to do &#8212;&#8211; it is a OCEAN FREIGHT LINER, you don&#8217;t turn it around instantly, but it is geared toward the right direction, so please have some &#8220;wisdom&#8221; like Obama processes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilya Lopekha</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-1#comment-14045</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilya Lopekha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14045</guid>
		<description>To Jeffe:

I’m not sure what “neo-con money-loving idiologs” mean in this context other than it’s an attempt to use as many adjectives as you can in one sentence.

I would love to use the right adjective, but I cannot use in this forum - nothing dirty, though.  It is one of those &quot;taboo&quot; things that we cannot talk about publicly.

Wondering if you figured out why Richard Halbrook is &quot;the wrong&quot; pick for that Afghanistan/Pakistan Post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Jeffe:</p>
<p>I’m not sure what “neo-con money-loving idiologs” mean in this context other than it’s an attempt to use as many adjectives as you can in one sentence.</p>
<p>I would love to use the right adjective, but I cannot use in this forum &#8211; nothing dirty, though.  It is one of those &#8220;taboo&#8221; things that we cannot talk about publicly.</p>
<p>Wondering if you figured out why Richard Halbrook is &#8220;the wrong&#8221; pick for that Afghanistan/Pakistan Post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millard-fillmore</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-1#comment-14042</link>
		<dc:creator>millard-fillmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 01:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14042</guid>
		<description>When in doubt, I just go to youtube and watch a video of Obama&#039;s speech from last year, and loudly chant 20 times &quot;Yes We Can.&quot; That seems to soothe me down and take all my troubles away. Blind belief in Obama&#039;s rhetoric works like magic and never fails to give me confidence. You guys who are having doubts about him should give it a shot. ;)
/tongue-in-cheek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When in doubt, I just go to youtube and watch a video of Obama&#8217;s speech from last year, and loudly chant 20 times &#8220;Yes We Can.&#8221; That seems to soothe me down and take all my troubles away. Blind belief in Obama&#8217;s rhetoric works like magic and never fails to give me confidence. You guys who are having doubts about him should give it a shot. <img src='http://www.onpointradio.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
/tongue-in-cheek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-1#comment-14038</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14038</guid>
		<description>Hi jeffe, 

i think your partly wrong about obama, everyone must know or have a reasonable guess that, obama cannot get everything done the way u like it or the way he himself would like. (cant win every battle pick and choose)but u can the war.

I believe that the real push for reform from obama will be after his second term in office. but still a better pick than mccain and palin, 

As for lynne, when captilism is feeding on itself in order to make great wealth for a few,while taking away from others it is a problem..025 percent loans from the government(tax payers money)to 20 to 30 percent to the public.

 As in the past like AT&amp;T and Oil, railroads and such it was always safe-guards in place to stop meagers that would give them the to big to fail mentality and too much consolidated power. yet was systemitically reversed for banks, and this is what happen because of this. they use the whole of americans to get want they want against the common good for all. one goal was to move our pensions to the market inwhich they did. we see the results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi jeffe, </p>
<p>i think your partly wrong about obama, everyone must know or have a reasonable guess that, obama cannot get everything done the way u like it or the way he himself would like. (cant win every battle pick and choose)but u can the war.</p>
<p>I believe that the real push for reform from obama will be after his second term in office. but still a better pick than mccain and palin, </p>
<p>As for lynne, when captilism is feeding on itself in order to make great wealth for a few,while taking away from others it is a problem..025 percent loans from the government(tax payers money)to 20 to 30 percent to the public.</p>
<p> As in the past like AT&amp;T and Oil, railroads and such it was always safe-guards in place to stop meagers that would give them the to big to fail mentality and too much consolidated power. yet was systemitically reversed for banks, and this is what happen because of this. they use the whole of americans to get want they want against the common good for all. one goal was to move our pensions to the market inwhich they did. we see the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-1#comment-14037</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14037</guid>
		<description>Amazing show.  I tuned in thinking that the &quot;Quiet Coup&quot; would be about the wholesale socialization that is and will be going on for some time to come.  Imagine my surpise when the &#039;worse [socialism]had become the better&#039; (Socrates was accused of corrupting the Athenian youth by making the &#039;worse argument appear the better&#039;).   Still, it is interesting to see how un-repressable state-ism is and how consistently characatured those evil capitalists are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing show.  I tuned in thinking that the &#8220;Quiet Coup&#8221; would be about the wholesale socialization that is and will be going on for some time to come.  Imagine my surpise when the &#8216;worse [socialism]had become the better&#8217; (Socrates was accused of corrupting the Athenian youth by making the &#8216;worse argument appear the better&#8217;).   Still, it is interesting to see how un-repressable state-ism is and how consistently characatured those evil capitalists are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-1#comment-14036</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14036</guid>
		<description>***Scale back. Too big to fail? Growth for growth’s sake will be the end of us. Keep it real.***

Can&#039;t agree more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>***Scale back. Too big to fail? Growth for growth’s sake will be the end of us. Keep it real.***</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t agree more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffe</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-1#comment-14021</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14021</guid>
		<description>Lilya your still drinking the Obama kool-aid.
I voted for him and I believed in all the eloquent rhetoric that he is so good at. However he is a centrist and not a progressive as I mistakenly thought. 

He wont ask Summers or Geitner to step down and has in fact added more players from the group that were part of the Clinton administration.  

I&#039;m not sure what &quot;neo-con money-loving idiologs&quot; mean in this context other than it&#039;s an attempt to use as many adjectives as you can in one sentence.

I really wanted to believe in Obama but he is proving week after week that he is no different than any other politician. As for congress, I hold them in contempt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lilya your still drinking the Obama kool-aid.<br />
I voted for him and I believed in all the eloquent rhetoric that he is so good at. However he is a centrist and not a progressive as I mistakenly thought. </p>
<p>He wont ask Summers or Geitner to step down and has in fact added more players from the group that were part of the Clinton administration.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what &#8220;neo-con money-loving idiologs&#8221; mean in this context other than it&#8217;s an attempt to use as many adjectives as you can in one sentence.</p>
<p>I really wanted to believe in Obama but he is proving week after week that he is no different than any other politician. As for congress, I hold them in contempt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilya Lopekha</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-1#comment-14016</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilya Lopekha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14016</guid>
		<description>Nai Hak is right.  Obama could very well be one of the protestors in London.  

He personally, understands the whole picture.  It is &quot;our&quot; job clean the idiot neo-con money-loving idiologs around him.

If he does the real change thing, they will bring him down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nai Hak is right.  Obama could very well be one of the protestors in London.  </p>
<p>He personally, understands the whole picture.  It is &#8220;our&#8221; job clean the idiot neo-con money-loving idiologs around him.</p>
<p>If he does the real change thing, they will bring him down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnold</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-1#comment-14005</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14005</guid>
		<description>Politics is corrupted by corporate, labor and trial lawyer self-interests.  Their participation should be abolished or real change will forever escape us.

All debt should be forgiven and no more issued; that is, no more credit cards or mortgages.  People are incapable of using either responsibly.  Mortgage interest deductibility is a huge scam created by the realtors and real estate attorneys.  We would be better served forcing people to live within their means.  Life is not about a giant flat screen TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politics is corrupted by corporate, labor and trial lawyer self-interests.  Their participation should be abolished or real change will forever escape us.</p>
<p>All debt should be forgiven and no more issued; that is, no more credit cards or mortgages.  People are incapable of using either responsibly.  Mortgage interest deductibility is a huge scam created by the realtors and real estate attorneys.  We would be better served forcing people to live within their means.  Life is not about a giant flat screen TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-1#comment-14003</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 01:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14003</guid>
		<description>I agree with Eric...it&#039;s hard to hear the President give it straight to GM and Chrysler and not do the same with the banking industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Eric&#8230;it&#8217;s hard to hear the President give it straight to GM and Chrysler and not do the same with the banking industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Benedict</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-1#comment-14002</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Benedict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 01:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14002</guid>
		<description>Finally, someone in a position of authority (and w/amplified voice) who understands that the USA has been and is being run largely by a corporate oligarchy. When I have told people that (for years now) many think I&#039;m a wacko. The solution: ELIMINATE corporate participation in our democratic election processes. Frankly though, you really need to focus a radio program on the emergency need to begin implementation of Ecological Economics, that is redesigning our economic system as a sustainable part of the earth ecosystem. MB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, someone in a position of authority (and w/amplified voice) who understands that the USA has been and is being run largely by a corporate oligarchy. When I have told people that (for years now) many think I&#8217;m a wacko. The solution: ELIMINATE corporate participation in our democratic election processes. Frankly though, you really need to focus a radio program on the emergency need to begin implementation of Ecological Economics, that is redesigning our economic system as a sustainable part of the earth ecosystem. MB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Dibble</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-1#comment-14000</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Dibble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 01:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-14000</guid>
		<description>How will we know if our anger permeates through?  Obama calls for it.  As I recall he said it was an essential ingredient without which he could not gain the cooperation of the bankers.  
    If people &quot;got through,&quot; For one thing I believe we&#039;d find there would be enough tax on oil/gas (and I suppose emissions, cap in trade) to really shift the kind of houses we want to live in and the kind of vehicles we want to drive.  (Our pain; their total redirection.)  But auto companies couldn&#039;t then say well, Americans buy more vans than Priuses, so we build them.  
    In terms of health, again there would have to be a clear monetary reward for keeping people healthy at less cost, not stringing them along where the most money is to be made.  
   All the lobbying money in the US would be risen up against such change, so an awful lot of anger would have to come to bear.  
   And who exactly would rise up in anger and ask for higher costs for (taxed) energy, for instance?  But if the entrenched monied interests apparently blindsiding Americans are to be uprooted and replanted, then the sources of their wealth have to be considered.   
   I wonder if overcharging for credit card services -- the way the banks have been trying to get oxygen from us to survive -- could be kneecapped (figuratively) by some tax.  I have no idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How will we know if our anger permeates through?  Obama calls for it.  As I recall he said it was an essential ingredient without which he could not gain the cooperation of the bankers.<br />
    If people &#8220;got through,&#8221; For one thing I believe we&#8217;d find there would be enough tax on oil/gas (and I suppose emissions, cap in trade) to really shift the kind of houses we want to live in and the kind of vehicles we want to drive.  (Our pain; their total redirection.)  But auto companies couldn&#8217;t then say well, Americans buy more vans than Priuses, so we build them.<br />
    In terms of health, again there would have to be a clear monetary reward for keeping people healthy at less cost, not stringing them along where the most money is to be made.<br />
   All the lobbying money in the US would be risen up against such change, so an awful lot of anger would have to come to bear.<br />
   And who exactly would rise up in anger and ask for higher costs for (taxed) energy, for instance?  But if the entrenched monied interests apparently blindsiding Americans are to be uprooted and replanted, then the sources of their wealth have to be considered.<br />
   I wonder if overcharging for credit card services &#8212; the way the banks have been trying to get oxygen from us to survive &#8212; could be kneecapped (figuratively) by some tax.  I have no idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lois scribner</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/03/are-the-banks-running-america/comment-page-1#comment-13998</link>
		<dc:creator>lois scribner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14003#comment-13998</guid>
		<description>ps I just started to read Newsweek with the article about Krugman&#039;s critique of the current government policies and there are echoes of the same analysis taken a bit further.
I wonder if I am alone in wishing there was more sense of outrage and some degree of moral anger about these socio-economic trends?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps I just started to read Newsweek with the article about Krugman&#8217;s critique of the current government policies and there are echoes of the same analysis taken a bit further.<br />
I wonder if I am alone in wishing there was more sense of outrage and some degree of moral anger about these socio-economic trends?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
