wbur.org
support wbur today!
Homeland Security & Angry America

On Monday, we had a fiesty discussion about “angry America” – the mood of the country in the context of an economic downturn and an activist Obama administration. It’s a hot topic that generated strong on-air and online debate here. We played sound bites that surfaced the anger, from Glenn Beck to Rush Limbaugh. Now, the government itself is joining the debate at a more serious level.

One of the guests on our show, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Mark Potok, is worried that extremist groups are being energized across the country. Some of this was discussed during our Monday hour.

Whether you buy it or not, it turns out Potok is not alone. The Department of Homeland Security recently circulated a controversial report to law enforcement on the topic. The assessment was unclassified, but was meant to be kept within officialdom. (Steve Aftergood of Secrecy News, a blog through the Federation of American Scientists that functions as a relentless check on government, posted it on Tuesday. That’s the earliest we saw it.)

“[T]he historical election of an African American president and the prospect of policy changes are proving to be a driving force for rightwing extremist recruitment and radicalization,” the report states.

But one aspect of the government’s threat assessment has drawn strong pushback from some quarters.

Most controversially, the report features a section called “Disgruntled Military Veterans.” It states, “The willingness of a small percentage of military personnel to join extremist groups during the 1990s because they were disgruntled, disillusioned, or suffering from the psychological effects of war is being replicated today.”

House Minority Leader John A. Boehner fired back, calling the veterans section “offensive and unacceptable.” Veterans groups say it feeds a crude stereotype about the millions who have served.

This prompted Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to express regret that it seemed to single out former troops. She went on Fox News yesterday to apologize.

Suffice it to say, we probably haven’t heard the last on this one.

 

Tags: , ,

 
 
Listener comments
  • Apparently we’ve all forgotten about the Oklahoma City bombing. The current threat assessment isn’t identifying a new threat but reminding us of the threat which led to the Oklahoma City tragedy and still exists. Timothy McVeigh was a returned veteran, lest we forget, recruited into a white-supremacy group.

    Posted by Mark, on April 17th, 2009 at 9:59 AM
  • Apparently, for liberals, memory is selective. Bill Ayres is a domestic terrorist who bombed federal buildings and yet he is now hailed as a hero of the left. You cannot have it both ways.

    Bottom line is that extremists exist on both ends of the political spectrum. Some of those extremists use violence as a way of making a point. Targeting veterans (I am one myself) is grossly unfair.

    Posted by Michael, on April 17th, 2009 at 10:44 AM
Recent Shows
The Stieg Larsson Story
Friday, March 19, 2010

“The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo,” the Swedish thriller that’s sweeping the globe — and the death of its author, Stieg Larsson.

Comments [8]
 
Week in the News
Friday, March 19, 2010

The health care climax looms. The president signs a jobs bill. And murder in Mexico hits home. Our weekly news roundtable goes behind the headlines.

Comments [90]
On Point Blog
Sonny Rollins on Race and Jazz’s Future

Jazz legend Sonny Rollins joined us to reflect on his storied career and give us his thoughts on the future of music. To celebrate his 80th birthday, the hugely influential tenor saxophonist is embarking on yet another national tour.

More »
 
IED’s in Afghanistan: Hard Numbers

The Department of Defense provided On Point with some statistics about IED attacks in Afghanistan, where there has been an increase in the use of such weapons over the past 14 months. It’s striking to see the spike in numbers — from 2,677 IED incidents in 2007 to 8,159 last year.

More » | Comments [2]
 
Christopher Hill: U.S. Troop Withdrawal ‘On Schedule’

U.S. Ambassaor to Iraq Christopher Hill spoke with On Point live from Baghdad today as early voting gets underway, part of the run-up to Sunday’s elections. “So far so good,” Hill said, despite scattered violence. Hill said that the plan to withdraw U.S. combat troops by Sept. 1, and to leave only a residual advisory force of 50,000 or fewer, remains “very much on schedule.” Observers worry that a spike in violence could derail that timeline.

More »