<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California: Too Big to Fail?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail</link>
	<description>On Point is a live, two-hour morning news-analysis program, produced by WBUR 90.9 and NPR.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:26:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17985</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 16:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17985</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a lifelong Northeaster who has always admired California&#039;s beauty but been surprised and confused by its problems.  In my opinion, a few things need to be done for this, the richest and loveliest state in so meany ways, to get it together.  

They need to rewrite their budget process.  They need to stop being held hostage by all these statewide ballot measures.  They need to do something to stem the flow of illegal immigration.  Easier said than done, I&#039;m sure!  But I think that is what needs to happen.  

The U.S. government should not be in the business of bailing out large state governments, except in extraordinary circumstances, for the simple reason that eventually there will be a cascading effect, and the federal government could be tottering on the brink of financial failure.  Then we will become like Germany in the 1920s, hyperinflation, nationwide economic depression - don&#039;t laugh, it could still happen.

The California Dream of 1880-1970 is over, has been for a while.  It is a little sad - it was a nice dream.  Now Californians need to find some more sensible ways of governing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a lifelong Northeaster who has always admired California&#8217;s beauty but been surprised and confused by its problems.  In my opinion, a few things need to be done for this, the richest and loveliest state in so meany ways, to get it together.  </p>
<p>They need to rewrite their budget process.  They need to stop being held hostage by all these statewide ballot measures.  They need to do something to stem the flow of illegal immigration.  Easier said than done, I&#8217;m sure!  But I think that is what needs to happen.  </p>
<p>The U.S. government should not be in the business of bailing out large state governments, except in extraordinary circumstances, for the simple reason that eventually there will be a cascading effect, and the federal government could be tottering on the brink of financial failure.  Then we will become like Germany in the 1920s, hyperinflation, nationwide economic depression &#8211; don&#8217;t laugh, it could still happen.</p>
<p>The California Dream of 1880-1970 is over, has been for a while.  It is a little sad &#8211; it was a nice dream.  Now Californians need to find some more sensible ways of governing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AD Schleifer</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17732</link>
		<dc:creator>AD Schleifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17732</guid>
		<description>What was the name of the book referenced as the &quot;best book on California&quot;? The comments suggested it was written awhile ago, but that it was still the best description of the State.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was the name of the book referenced as the &#8220;best book on California&#8221;? The comments suggested it was written awhile ago, but that it was still the best description of the State.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17669</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17669</guid>
		<description>It is so sad to see how difficult it has become to live in CA. The Democrates and radical liberals have destroyed this state with their policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is so sad to see how difficult it has become to live in CA. The Democrates and radical liberals have destroyed this state with their policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TM</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17666</link>
		<dc:creator>TM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17666</guid>
		<description>So, if we fired every worker in the state it wouldn&#039;t fix the budget. Tom, please challenge statements like that because they are ridiculous. Sure it wouldn&#039;t fix the budget, but increasing efficiency would help. I have a relative who teaches in the community college system. Works a good 15 to 20 hours a week, for his full time job. Makes a lot more than the 60K mentioned. Maybe he&#039;s an isolated case. But I doubt it.

You have a huge costly prison system with a high percentage of illegal aliens. And now you have high unemployment costs with millions of illegals taking your jobs. And they&#039;re not just farm work. I know a contractor who says he hires illegals to stay price competitive with other contractors who do the same.

There are many sources of california problems. And there will need to be many solutions. But I doubt the legislatures will make politically incorrect decisions or take on unions who vote them in office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, if we fired every worker in the state it wouldn&#8217;t fix the budget. Tom, please challenge statements like that because they are ridiculous. Sure it wouldn&#8217;t fix the budget, but increasing efficiency would help. I have a relative who teaches in the community college system. Works a good 15 to 20 hours a week, for his full time job. Makes a lot more than the 60K mentioned. Maybe he&#8217;s an isolated case. But I doubt it.</p>
<p>You have a huge costly prison system with a high percentage of illegal aliens. And now you have high unemployment costs with millions of illegals taking your jobs. And they&#8217;re not just farm work. I know a contractor who says he hires illegals to stay price competitive with other contractors who do the same.</p>
<p>There are many sources of california problems. And there will need to be many solutions. But I doubt the legislatures will make politically incorrect decisions or take on unions who vote them in office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe B.</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17652</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17652</guid>
		<description>Putney Swope, one of the reasons unemployment in Michigan is so high is because the UAW has become excessively powerful, demanding, and greedy.  The UAW broke Chrysler, Ford, and G.M.. Foreign car companies aren&#039;t building factories in Michigan, they&#039;re building factories in Ga., S.C., Tenn., and Al.. Why you ask? To get away from the UAW (one of Obama&#039;s biggest supporters). Once again Putney Swope, your total ignorance shines through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putney Swope, one of the reasons unemployment in Michigan is so high is because the UAW has become excessively powerful, demanding, and greedy.  The UAW broke Chrysler, Ford, and G.M.. Foreign car companies aren&#8217;t building factories in Michigan, they&#8217;re building factories in Ga., S.C., Tenn., and Al.. Why you ask? To get away from the UAW (one of Obama&#8217;s biggest supporters). Once again Putney Swope, your total ignorance shines through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17647</link>
		<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 02:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17647</guid>
		<description>The US seems to be the only &quot;developed&quot; country in the world whose citizens prefer to bring down the living conditions of their neighbors rather than improve their own. 

Members of unions have good wages and benefits because their predecessors looked at their wretched, unsafe working conditions and 14-hour+/7-day workweeks and lack of health care and discrimination and their individual powerlessness and decided that their children shouldn&#039;t live that way. They got together with other powerless people and formed a union. 

And now (like everyone else) they have weekends and 8-hour days and insurance when you&#039;re sick and vacations.

I wish people would spend as much time trying to figure out effective routes to improving *everyone&#039;s* lives *up* to these standards as they spend complaining about those who have them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US seems to be the only &#8220;developed&#8221; country in the world whose citizens prefer to bring down the living conditions of their neighbors rather than improve their own. </p>
<p>Members of unions have good wages and benefits because their predecessors looked at their wretched, unsafe working conditions and 14-hour+/7-day workweeks and lack of health care and discrimination and their individual powerlessness and decided that their children shouldn&#8217;t live that way. They got together with other powerless people and formed a union. </p>
<p>And now (like everyone else) they have weekends and 8-hour days and insurance when you&#8217;re sick and vacations.</p>
<p>I wish people would spend as much time trying to figure out effective routes to improving *everyone&#8217;s* lives *up* to these standards as they spend complaining about those who have them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17645</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 01:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17645</guid>
		<description>California has a basic problem - it spends more than it can generate in tax revenues and it can&#039;t increase taxes. It already has some of the highest corporate and individual income taxes in the country. It can&#039;t raise real estate taxes because of Prop A. Real estate prices went through the roof long before anyone heard of subprime loans, which was strangling many homeowners. However still Californians wanted more government services than it could afford. California needs to go bankrupt. Only after their ability to borrow it stopped will they &quot;get it&quot;. Unfortunately I think California is the prelude to what is coming for the entire country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California has a basic problem &#8211; it spends more than it can generate in tax revenues and it can&#8217;t increase taxes. It already has some of the highest corporate and individual income taxes in the country. It can&#8217;t raise real estate taxes because of Prop A. Real estate prices went through the roof long before anyone heard of subprime loans, which was strangling many homeowners. However still Californians wanted more government services than it could afford. California needs to go bankrupt. Only after their ability to borrow it stopped will they &#8220;get it&#8221;. Unfortunately I think California is the prelude to what is coming for the entire country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17642</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17642</guid>
		<description>Tom,

When you hear a Democratic comptroller claim that teachers &quot;pay&quot; is only 60,000 and therefore quite reasonable, doesnt an alarm go off in your head, or in the head of one of the other panelists, that the word &quot;pay&quot; is ambiguous, and a way for him to fudge...ie. lie.

Teachers average statewide total compensation (including their health care benefits, and retirement benefits)is MUCH higher than 60k. More like 90K most of which (of the benefits) is unfunded due to democratic (lets be real here) politicians caving in to the whims of the teachers union (same with prison guards) in order to get reelected (with the support of their union conspirators) than in fiscal responsibility. 

But he got in his word, and it is now planted in your listeners heads...so too late...maybe the evil forces at Fox news will actually point this out to him if he pulls that on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>When you hear a Democratic comptroller claim that teachers &#8220;pay&#8221; is only 60,000 and therefore quite reasonable, doesnt an alarm go off in your head, or in the head of one of the other panelists, that the word &#8220;pay&#8221; is ambiguous, and a way for him to fudge&#8230;ie. lie.</p>
<p>Teachers average statewide total compensation (including their health care benefits, and retirement benefits)is MUCH higher than 60k. More like 90K most of which (of the benefits) is unfunded due to democratic (lets be real here) politicians caving in to the whims of the teachers union (same with prison guards) in order to get reelected (with the support of their union conspirators) than in fiscal responsibility. </p>
<p>But he got in his word, and it is now planted in your listeners heads&#8230;so too late&#8230;maybe the evil forces at Fox news will actually point this out to him if he pulls that on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foxwood</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17635</link>
		<dc:creator>Foxwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17635</guid>
		<description>Obaminamics is failure, but by design. He&#039;s done so much so fast, it can&#039;t be stupidity, but design. The list is so long for just 100+ days. California would be something else Obama could add to his design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obaminamics is failure, but by design. He&#8217;s done so much so fast, it can&#8217;t be stupidity, but design. The list is so long for just 100+ days. California would be something else Obama could add to his design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17628</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 18:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17628</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom. Normally I find your program wonderful, but today&#039;s program on
California&#039;s mess generated more heat than enlightenment -- most of the
heat from uninformed out of staters and a mediocre panelist. I tried to
call in, but couldn&#039;t get past the busy signal.

The budget/deficit discussion was largely beside the point because it
ignored the two large elephants in the room:

Elephant 1. The requirement that it takes a 2/3 majority of both houses of
the Legislature to pass a budget. This allows The Minority Party Of No! to
hold the entire state hostage to its unwavering hatred of government in
any way, shape or form aside from things that subsidize their privileged
flock. For the past 20+ years, it has been impossible to pass a budget on
time because of this. This past year, the process dragged on for more than
6 months, in total stalemate, because one more vote was needed, and that
one vote could not be found. Until finally one TMPON! state Senator, mine
by the way, agreed to jump ship provided he got everything in his
self-serving agenda included one way or another -- including future ballot
measures to be put before statewide voters! One of his measures explains
it all: a measure allowing open-party primaries for statewide offices,
something we approved several years ago, but which TMPON! went to court to
successfully block. Why is this issue so important to our Senator? Because
he&#039;s about to be termed out (having already been termed out as an Assembly
member), and wants to stay in politics; he wants to be able to be a budget
hero and attract votes from non-TMPON! people, like Democrats! Which
brings us to:

Elephant 2. Term limits. This initiative was sold to a naive public by
TMPON! as a &quot;fix the bastards&quot; measure. As a result, a legislator is
limited to 6 years in the Assembly, and 8 in the Senate. It is said (and I
believe it from my own experience on lesser public boards) that it takes
about 5 years to learn the process of legislating. But by 5 years, one is
about ready to be termed out. So our legislative &quot;leadership&quot; is both
inexperienced and constantly changing, and the bulk of legislators don&#039;t
have a clue how to legislate. This is tragic. Think of all the outstanding
national legislators who would not be serving if Congress worked this way!
When term limits were passed, TMPON! used it&#039;s Willy Hortonesque posterboy
Willy Brown to get the point across -- his bald black head was plastered
in almost every term limits ad as illustrative of &quot;the problem.&quot; This was
disgraceful, but it worked.

These are the key structural reasons why California is in such bad shape.
TMPON! has turned on its own governor and my senator as traitors to their
obstructionist cause. It&#039;s sick. But none of this got discussed in your
show. Joe Mathews seemed to know his stuff, but Sandy Banks was way off
track, a fact made obvious when she said Bill Lockyer&#039;s milquetoast
comments had explained things she didn&#039;t understand before! (And she&#039;s a reporter! His comments sure weren&#039;t news to me, and I&#039;m not a reporter.) 

The vote on
Tuesday had next to nothing to do with taxes, as she alleged. The Jarvis
people, who are still regularly quoted by the media, aren&#039;t even
players anymore.

Taxes weren&#039;t the issue in this vote. All the propositions were gimmicks
that purported to solve problems, but most actually created worse
problems. People saw through the sham. The California Teachers Association (K-12) got their skin
covered by proposing to divert funds from mental health, childhood health
initiatives, food for the poor, university funding, etc., into K-12, but
their largest chapters (in northern AND southern California) jumped ship
when they realized the implications. UC and state university faculty
unions opposed those same measures, as did most of the labor movement.
Indicative of the gimmicky nature of the measures: the lottery
&quot;modernization&quot; measure would allow the state to sell bonds, to be paid
back over up to 30 years, to realize the proceeds of the next several
years of lottery receipts today, to plug into two years of state budgets.
That leaves a future generation to finish paying off these bonds, at some
multiple cost of the proceeds realized, from which they had no benefit. Can you seriously blame the voters for saying no to this scheme? Seems to me their judgment is improving. A
couple of years ago we passed at the ballot box a huge 30-year bond to
finance road repairs today -- another example of deferring payment for
today&#039;s needs that makes no fiscal sense. Long before the bonds are paid
off, those roads will have to be rebuilt again!

My take on the election outcome was that people are becoming aware of and
dismayed by this sort of nonsensical deficit spending to finance current
needs TMPON! refuses to let the legislature find in more sensible ways.
People are even saying we need to tax ourselves now to pay for what we want today --
and that&#039;s a really big change in attitude totally lost in the platitudes
of your show&#039;s unfortunately heated but off-track discussion of the
election. The election&#039;s real story simply isn&#039;t the one presented on air.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom. Normally I find your program wonderful, but today&#8217;s program on<br />
California&#8217;s mess generated more heat than enlightenment &#8212; most of the<br />
heat from uninformed out of staters and a mediocre panelist. I tried to<br />
call in, but couldn&#8217;t get past the busy signal.</p>
<p>The budget/deficit discussion was largely beside the point because it<br />
ignored the two large elephants in the room:</p>
<p>Elephant 1. The requirement that it takes a 2/3 majority of both houses of<br />
the Legislature to pass a budget. This allows The Minority Party Of No! to<br />
hold the entire state hostage to its unwavering hatred of government in<br />
any way, shape or form aside from things that subsidize their privileged<br />
flock. For the past 20+ years, it has been impossible to pass a budget on<br />
time because of this. This past year, the process dragged on for more than<br />
6 months, in total stalemate, because one more vote was needed, and that<br />
one vote could not be found. Until finally one TMPON! state Senator, mine<br />
by the way, agreed to jump ship provided he got everything in his<br />
self-serving agenda included one way or another &#8212; including future ballot<br />
measures to be put before statewide voters! One of his measures explains<br />
it all: a measure allowing open-party primaries for statewide offices,<br />
something we approved several years ago, but which TMPON! went to court to<br />
successfully block. Why is this issue so important to our Senator? Because<br />
he&#8217;s about to be termed out (having already been termed out as an Assembly<br />
member), and wants to stay in politics; he wants to be able to be a budget<br />
hero and attract votes from non-TMPON! people, like Democrats! Which<br />
brings us to:</p>
<p>Elephant 2. Term limits. This initiative was sold to a naive public by<br />
TMPON! as a &#8220;fix the bastards&#8221; measure. As a result, a legislator is<br />
limited to 6 years in the Assembly, and 8 in the Senate. It is said (and I<br />
believe it from my own experience on lesser public boards) that it takes<br />
about 5 years to learn the process of legislating. But by 5 years, one is<br />
about ready to be termed out. So our legislative &#8220;leadership&#8221; is both<br />
inexperienced and constantly changing, and the bulk of legislators don&#8217;t<br />
have a clue how to legislate. This is tragic. Think of all the outstanding<br />
national legislators who would not be serving if Congress worked this way!<br />
When term limits were passed, TMPON! used it&#8217;s Willy Hortonesque posterboy<br />
Willy Brown to get the point across &#8212; his bald black head was plastered<br />
in almost every term limits ad as illustrative of &#8220;the problem.&#8221; This was<br />
disgraceful, but it worked.</p>
<p>These are the key structural reasons why California is in such bad shape.<br />
TMPON! has turned on its own governor and my senator as traitors to their<br />
obstructionist cause. It&#8217;s sick. But none of this got discussed in your<br />
show. Joe Mathews seemed to know his stuff, but Sandy Banks was way off<br />
track, a fact made obvious when she said Bill Lockyer&#8217;s milquetoast<br />
comments had explained things she didn&#8217;t understand before! (And she&#8217;s a reporter! His comments sure weren&#8217;t news to me, and I&#8217;m not a reporter.) </p>
<p>The vote on<br />
Tuesday had next to nothing to do with taxes, as she alleged. The Jarvis<br />
people, who are still regularly quoted by the media, aren&#8217;t even<br />
players anymore.</p>
<p>Taxes weren&#8217;t the issue in this vote. All the propositions were gimmicks<br />
that purported to solve problems, but most actually created worse<br />
problems. People saw through the sham. The California Teachers Association (K-12) got their skin<br />
covered by proposing to divert funds from mental health, childhood health<br />
initiatives, food for the poor, university funding, etc., into K-12, but<br />
their largest chapters (in northern AND southern California) jumped ship<br />
when they realized the implications. UC and state university faculty<br />
unions opposed those same measures, as did most of the labor movement.<br />
Indicative of the gimmicky nature of the measures: the lottery<br />
&#8220;modernization&#8221; measure would allow the state to sell bonds, to be paid<br />
back over up to 30 years, to realize the proceeds of the next several<br />
years of lottery receipts today, to plug into two years of state budgets.<br />
That leaves a future generation to finish paying off these bonds, at some<br />
multiple cost of the proceeds realized, from which they had no benefit. Can you seriously blame the voters for saying no to this scheme? Seems to me their judgment is improving. A<br />
couple of years ago we passed at the ballot box a huge 30-year bond to<br />
finance road repairs today &#8212; another example of deferring payment for<br />
today&#8217;s needs that makes no fiscal sense. Long before the bonds are paid<br />
off, those roads will have to be rebuilt again!</p>
<p>My take on the election outcome was that people are becoming aware of and<br />
dismayed by this sort of nonsensical deficit spending to finance current<br />
needs TMPON! refuses to let the legislature find in more sensible ways.<br />
People are even saying we need to tax ourselves now to pay for what we want today &#8211;<br />
and that&#8217;s a really big change in attitude totally lost in the platitudes<br />
of your show&#8217;s unfortunately heated but off-track discussion of the<br />
election. The election&#8217;s real story simply isn&#8217;t the one presented on air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17622</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17622</guid>
		<description>If I remember correctly, Gray Davis (D) was ousted by the voters because of his inability to deal with a fiscal crisis. Arnold (R) was elected because of his what? business prowess, underlying fiscal conservatism? What? And five years later where is CA? Just goes to show how much good it does to listen to the Republican BS about their small government fiscally conservative ideology. What is the benefit of having Republicans in positions of power, as opposed to Dems, anyways? MA has had the whole series of R governors and to what avail?  

P.S. I am a big fan of and respect Arnold as a person very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I remember correctly, Gray Davis (D) was ousted by the voters because of his inability to deal with a fiscal crisis. Arnold (R) was elected because of his what? business prowess, underlying fiscal conservatism? What? And five years later where is CA? Just goes to show how much good it does to listen to the Republican BS about their small government fiscally conservative ideology. What is the benefit of having Republicans in positions of power, as opposed to Dems, anyways? MA has had the whole series of R governors and to what avail?  </p>
<p>P.S. I am a big fan of and respect Arnold as a person very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putney Swope</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17605</link>
		<dc:creator>Putney Swope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17605</guid>
		<description>Sandy Banks is spot on. In my state Massachusetts the state legislators just voted themselves a pay raise. 
They also just raised the state sales tax.

A few weeks ago on a Saturday I watched this cop stand on the side walk while window cleaners worked using a cherry picker. I noticed him standing next to his car, a 40k or 50k BMW sports car. 

When I was working as freelance web designer, on of the other freelancers was on line to get a job with the state as a programmer. He was bragging how he would only have to work 3 to 4 hours a day and get paid for 8. The salary was in the 6 figures with a nice fat state pension.

Give me break, most state systems are so corrupt and full of dead weight. We need sweeping reforms here.
Get rid of the dead weight, no more free rides.
You work for 4 hours, that&#039;s all your going to be paid for. In fact your a part time employee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy Banks is spot on. In my state Massachusetts the state legislators just voted themselves a pay raise.<br />
They also just raised the state sales tax.</p>
<p>A few weeks ago on a Saturday I watched this cop stand on the side walk while window cleaners worked using a cherry picker. I noticed him standing next to his car, a 40k or 50k BMW sports car. </p>
<p>When I was working as freelance web designer, on of the other freelancers was on line to get a job with the state as a programmer. He was bragging how he would only have to work 3 to 4 hours a day and get paid for 8. The salary was in the 6 figures with a nice fat state pension.</p>
<p>Give me break, most state systems are so corrupt and full of dead weight. We need sweeping reforms here.<br />
Get rid of the dead weight, no more free rides.<br />
You work for 4 hours, that&#8217;s all your going to be paid for. In fact your a part time employee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17602</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17602</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why the entertainment industry is not tapped in some way to help out the entertainment capital, while the actors (and others in the entertainment industry) who are so insanely paid for their &quot;work&quot; seem to have idealistic answers for all of the world&#039;s woes, while they live comfortably from the need of people to escape from their difficult lives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why the entertainment industry is not tapped in some way to help out the entertainment capital, while the actors (and others in the entertainment industry) who are so insanely paid for their &#8220;work&#8221; seem to have idealistic answers for all of the world&#8217;s woes, while they live comfortably from the need of people to escape from their difficult lives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17601</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17601</guid>
		<description>Is California going to be the poster child for the end of the American dream? .... the end of the frontier?  We are as west as you can go in the US,.. there is no more &quot;go west young man..&quot;  are we now having to face with the loss of the open prairies and vast deserts? Was California built on land developers&#039; greed?

Pasadena, CA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is California going to be the poster child for the end of the American dream? &#8230;. the end of the frontier?  We are as west as you can go in the US,.. there is no more &#8220;go west young man..&#8221;  are we now having to face with the loss of the open prairies and vast deserts? Was California built on land developers&#8217; greed?</p>
<p>Pasadena, CA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17600</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17600</guid>
		<description>What does the panel think about the proposal to legalize the recreational use of marijuana in California, at least in part proposed to increase state revenue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does the panel think about the proposal to legalize the recreational use of marijuana in California, at least in part proposed to increase state revenue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robin</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17598</link>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17598</guid>
		<description>Is Gov. Schwarzenegger&#039;s plea real or just an excuse for California to get some of the bailout money?  Life for many Californians is not very different now than before the economic downturn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Gov. Schwarzenegger&#8217;s plea real or just an excuse for California to get some of the bailout money?  Life for many Californians is not very different now than before the economic downturn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putney Swope</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17597</link>
		<dc:creator>Putney Swope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17597</guid>
		<description>Hers why TARP and all the bank bailouts have failed.
Obama and the legislators should have put money into the states. Of course the problem with state governments and corruption would an is an issue, but it seems we the tax payers have put billions into the banks with no returns.

What gives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hers why TARP and all the bank bailouts have failed.<br />
Obama and the legislators should have put money into the states. Of course the problem with state governments and corruption would an is an issue, but it seems we the tax payers have put billions into the banks with no returns.</p>
<p>What gives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EIO Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17595</link>
		<dc:creator>EIO Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17595</guid>
		<description>Tom,

Can you ask your guests, how California can pay for any funds raised through bond issues if they refuse to tax themselves?

Kind regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>Can you ask your guests, how California can pay for any funds raised through bond issues if they refuse to tax themselves?</p>
<p>Kind regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putney Swope</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17594</link>
		<dc:creator>Putney Swope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17594</guid>
		<description>Joe B, if that&#039;s so then I guess Michigan would be a good model, it&#039;s been anything but green, with a 13 to 15% unemployment rate and in some areas it is approaching 20%. 

Your so off base it&#039;s not even funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe B, if that&#8217;s so then I guess Michigan would be a good model, it&#8217;s been anything but green, with a 13 to 15% unemployment rate and in some areas it is approaching 20%. </p>
<p>Your so off base it&#8217;s not even funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe B.</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/california-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1#comment-17588</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14338#comment-17588</guid>
		<description>California has some of the highest gas/energy taxes and costs in the country. California has an unemployment rate of nearly 10%. President Obama wants to make California the model that the rest of the nation follows. Obama and his administration are driven by radical &quot;green&quot; ideology that will hurt the economy, cost millions of Americans their jobs, lower our standard of living, and create significant fuel/energy increases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California has some of the highest gas/energy taxes and costs in the country. California has an unemployment rate of nearly 10%. President Obama wants to make California the model that the rest of the nation follows. Obama and his administration are driven by radical &#8220;green&#8221; ideology that will hurt the economy, cost millions of Americans their jobs, lower our standard of living, and create significant fuel/energy increases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
