<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheney v. Obama highlights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/cheney-v-obama-highlights/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/cheney-v-obama-highlights</link>
	<description>On Point is a live, two-hour morning news-analysis program, produced by WBUR 90.9 and NPR.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:39:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/cheney-v-obama-highlights/comment-page-1#comment-18183</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14346#comment-18183</guid>
		<description>disregard the prior post.

in simple since it not allowing me to post what i revised.

why is the media giving 80% to a known lier who represents 20% of the population? who sacrifice our liberties for a little security or perceived security.

The world was not safer now because of him, we loss our moral high grounds, world opinions, there were still terrorist attacks in the U.K. and Spain, we lose 4k troops plus in iraq, and 20k to 30k injured. Not to mention the 100k people killed in iraq and 2million displaced just in iraq.  

Information just came out that this vital information he stated he got was done though normal means, and before he was water boarded.(CIA officals) and yet he states that water boarding worked, it worked so well he had to do it over 80 times. 

Logic says he is lieing 

also there information coming out that they water boarding another suspect to link iraq and Al&#039; Quada for politcal reasons. 

If you believe what Cheney is say your either foolish and just plain dumb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>disregard the prior post.</p>
<p>in simple since it not allowing me to post what i revised.</p>
<p>why is the media giving 80% to a known lier who represents 20% of the population? who sacrifice our liberties for a little security or perceived security.</p>
<p>The world was not safer now because of him, we loss our moral high grounds, world opinions, there were still terrorist attacks in the U.K. and Spain, we lose 4k troops plus in iraq, and 20k to 30k injured. Not to mention the 100k people killed in iraq and 2million displaced just in iraq.  </p>
<p>Information just came out that this vital information he stated he got was done though normal means, and before he was water boarded.(CIA officals) and yet he states that water boarding worked, it worked so well he had to do it over 80 times. </p>
<p>Logic says he is lieing </p>
<p>also there information coming out that they water boarding another suspect to link iraq and Al&#8217; Quada for politcal reasons. </p>
<p>If you believe what Cheney is say your either foolish and just plain dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIke</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/cheney-v-obama-highlights/comment-page-1#comment-18181</link>
		<dc:creator>MIke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14346#comment-18181</guid>
		<description>why is the media giving 20percent of the population that was rejected 80 percent of the media coverage, and dont u fine it funny that chenney speech for invitation only and non-tranferable, and was set after obama speech along with michael steele and most of the failed republican party backing him.

yet the repubs want to investigate nacy p for what she may have known yet do no such thing for bush officals.
if u going to cover chenney so much call him on about the failure before 9/11 and the 4k plus troops killed for a illegal war, along with using fake intellegences with(waterboarding) info to tie saddam to al’queada to invade iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is the media giving 20percent of the population that was rejected 80 percent of the media coverage, and dont u fine it funny that chenney speech for invitation only and non-tranferable, and was set after obama speech along with michael steele and most of the failed republican party backing him.</p>
<p>yet the repubs want to investigate nacy p for what she may have known yet do no such thing for bush officals.<br />
if u going to cover chenney so much call him on about the failure before 9/11 and the 4k plus troops killed for a illegal war, along with using fake intellegences with(waterboarding) info to tie saddam to al’queada to invade iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe B.</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/cheney-v-obama-highlights/comment-page-1#comment-17842</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14346#comment-17842</guid>
		<description>Obama looked defensive, nervous, and unsure as to the efficacy of his actions. Obama has not convinced me that he has the necessary attributes to be a competent commander in chief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama looked defensive, nervous, and unsure as to the efficacy of his actions. Obama has not convinced me that he has the necessary attributes to be a competent commander in chief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imhere</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/cheney-v-obama-highlights/comment-page-1#comment-17827</link>
		<dc:creator>imhere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 01:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14346#comment-17827</guid>
		<description>Wow, I am also amazed at the unbelievable grammar and spelling from &quot;Mike&#039;s&quot; post. Hard to figure out what he&#039;s trying to say. Anyway, I have always thought that when it comes to dealing with terrorists,  Cheney sounds much more convincing than Obama. Obama sounds wet behind the ears. He scares me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I am also amazed at the unbelievable grammar and spelling from &#8220;Mike&#8217;s&#8221; post. Hard to figure out what he&#8217;s trying to say. Anyway, I have always thought that when it comes to dealing with terrorists,  Cheney sounds much more convincing than Obama. Obama sounds wet behind the ears. He scares me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/cheney-v-obama-highlights/comment-page-1#comment-17762</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 18:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14346#comment-17762</guid>
		<description>I am shocked that none of your commentators has pointed out the numerous misleading, if not downright false, statements Cheney made to make his case.

The Boston Herald today has a very interesting piece that points Cheney&#039;s &quot;inconsistencies&quot; such as quoting Director of national intelligence Admiral Blair as saying &quot;harsh interrogation&quot; techniques gave the US deeper understanding of Al Qaeda but failed to mention Admiral Blair ALSO said the &quot;the damage they (torture) have done to our interestes far outways whatever benefit they gave us...&quot;. And FBI director Muller, in direct contradiction to the Cheney mantra that their policies stopped attacks, said he didn&#039;t think the torture prevented any attacks. For goodness sake!  Why aren&#039;t your reporting on the military and conservatives who disagree with Cheney?  

And, why is no one asking how the Aphganistan policies of the last administration may have contributed greatly to the recent Taliban surge.

I know you guys are trying to fair but, come on, re-read what Cheney actually said and you&#039;ll see it is his speech is riddled with falsehoods. It is fear mongering at it&#039;s worst; Joe MCCarthy&#039;s ghost raising his ugly head.

 I wish someone at NPR could find the gumption to say it like it rather than talk as though Cheney and Obama&#039;s speeches even remotely deserved equal attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am shocked that none of your commentators has pointed out the numerous misleading, if not downright false, statements Cheney made to make his case.</p>
<p>The Boston Herald today has a very interesting piece that points Cheney&#8217;s &#8220;inconsistencies&#8221; such as quoting Director of national intelligence Admiral Blair as saying &#8220;harsh interrogation&#8221; techniques gave the US deeper understanding of Al Qaeda but failed to mention Admiral Blair ALSO said the &#8220;the damage they (torture) have done to our interestes far outways whatever benefit they gave us&#8230;&#8221;. And FBI director Muller, in direct contradiction to the Cheney mantra that their policies stopped attacks, said he didn&#8217;t think the torture prevented any attacks. For goodness sake!  Why aren&#8217;t your reporting on the military and conservatives who disagree with Cheney?  </p>
<p>And, why is no one asking how the Aphganistan policies of the last administration may have contributed greatly to the recent Taliban surge.</p>
<p>I know you guys are trying to fair but, come on, re-read what Cheney actually said and you&#8217;ll see it is his speech is riddled with falsehoods. It is fear mongering at it&#8217;s worst; Joe MCCarthy&#8217;s ghost raising his ugly head.</p>
<p> I wish someone at NPR could find the gumption to say it like it rather than talk as though Cheney and Obama&#8217;s speeches even remotely deserved equal attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/cheney-v-obama-highlights/comment-page-1#comment-17721</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14346#comment-17721</guid>
		<description>Mike,

You might have sounded a bit more convincing, if you comments hadn&#039;t consisted of incoherent rambling with absolutely no attention paid to simple grammar, spelling and punctuation.

Instead, you just come across as an illiterate moron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>You might have sounded a bit more convincing, if you comments hadn&#8217;t consisted of incoherent rambling with absolutely no attention paid to simple grammar, spelling and punctuation.</p>
<p>Instead, you just come across as an illiterate moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/05/cheney-v-obama-highlights/comment-page-1#comment-17636</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14346#comment-17636</guid>
		<description>why is the media giving 20percent of the population that was rejected 80 percent of the media coverage, and dont u fine it funny that chenney speech for invitation only and non-tranferable, and was set after obama speech along with michael steele and most of the failed republican party backing him. 

yet the repubs want to investigate nacy p for what she may have known yet do no such thing for bush officals. 
if u going to cover chenney so much call him on about the failure before 9/11 and the 4k plus troops killed for a illegal war, along with using fake intellegences with(waterboarding) info to tie saddam to al&#039;queada to invade iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is the media giving 20percent of the population that was rejected 80 percent of the media coverage, and dont u fine it funny that chenney speech for invitation only and non-tranferable, and was set after obama speech along with michael steele and most of the failed republican party backing him. </p>
<p>yet the repubs want to investigate nacy p for what she may have known yet do no such thing for bush officals.<br />
if u going to cover chenney so much call him on about the failure before 9/11 and the 4k plus troops killed for a illegal war, along with using fake intellegences with(waterboarding) info to tie saddam to al&#8217;queada to invade iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
