<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stimulus, Part Two?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package</link>
	<description>On Point is a live, two-hour morning news-analysis program, produced by WBUR 90.9 and NPR.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:12:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martyn Strong</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-2#comment-21270</link>
		<dc:creator>Martyn Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21270</guid>
		<description>Capital markets are unstable. In the past there was no way to make them stable. But today we have computer power that can be used to make them stable.

By using the greater computer power of today we can have a much higher turn over of capital in the capital market. This higher turnover will make the market harder to game or control and the market will no longer have the unstable run ups or declines. Who can change or control the market when say 20% of the capital is trading each day?

So now that we have the compute power to provide for all these transactions that will smooth out the market how do we force people to turn over at a rate of 20% a day? Easy, put a cap gains tax of 0% (zero) on all gains of 7 days or less and put a cap gains tax of 90% of all gains of more than 7 days.

The likes of Yahoo, Micosoft and/or Sun Micro Systems will give us the systems that will provide automated software agents to support turning over one&#039;s investments every 7 days (based on the specs you give the agent).

A system like this will make the financial markets work as smoothly as the local fruit market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capital markets are unstable. In the past there was no way to make them stable. But today we have computer power that can be used to make them stable.</p>
<p>By using the greater computer power of today we can have a much higher turn over of capital in the capital market. This higher turnover will make the market harder to game or control and the market will no longer have the unstable run ups or declines. Who can change or control the market when say 20% of the capital is trading each day?</p>
<p>So now that we have the compute power to provide for all these transactions that will smooth out the market how do we force people to turn over at a rate of 20% a day? Easy, put a cap gains tax of 0% (zero) on all gains of 7 days or less and put a cap gains tax of 90% of all gains of more than 7 days.</p>
<p>The likes of Yahoo, Micosoft and/or Sun Micro Systems will give us the systems that will provide automated software agents to support turning over one&#8217;s investments every 7 days (based on the specs you give the agent).</p>
<p>A system like this will make the financial markets work as smoothly as the local fruit market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-2#comment-21261</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21261</guid>
		<description>More stimulus = more debt.
It&#039;s high time we stop fooling ourselves and take our medicine.  No more borrowing against our children&#039;s future.  We already own a national debt of about $11 trillion, or about $37,000 per person.  Piling on more stimulus (debt) is immoral and amounts to taking money from a future generation.  We need a balanced budget amendment - now.  Oh yea, there will be plenty of pain, but who thinks its right to keep spending so much more than you take in.  Somebody will eventually have to pay the debt and growing interest or default on it.  Both are bad options for our economy and future.     

No one would want their parents leaving them a huge pile of debt, but that is exactly what we are doing.
Zack has it right, we need to call BS on Keynes school of economics and his followers like Paul Krugman and start using common sense.  

To the host, please get a few economists that have an opposing viewpoint - it would make for a much more interesting show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More stimulus = more debt.<br />
It&#8217;s high time we stop fooling ourselves and take our medicine.  No more borrowing against our children&#8217;s future.  We already own a national debt of about $11 trillion, or about $37,000 per person.  Piling on more stimulus (debt) is immoral and amounts to taking money from a future generation.  We need a balanced budget amendment &#8211; now.  Oh yea, there will be plenty of pain, but who thinks its right to keep spending so much more than you take in.  Somebody will eventually have to pay the debt and growing interest or default on it.  Both are bad options for our economy and future.     </p>
<p>No one would want their parents leaving them a huge pile of debt, but that is exactly what we are doing.<br />
Zack has it right, we need to call BS on Keynes school of economics and his followers like Paul Krugman and start using common sense.  </p>
<p>To the host, please get a few economists that have an opposing viewpoint &#8211; it would make for a much more interesting show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putney Swope</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-2#comment-21251</link>
		<dc:creator>Putney Swope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21251</guid>
		<description>zack while your comments are interesting in a kind of libertarian way, your wrong, Congress can raise funds and spend them as they see fit.

The Constitution was not meant to be a document written in stone as an absolute. Witness amendments that have been added over the years. 

I could argue that the 2nd amendment, which was a response to the British efforts to disarm their militias in the late 18th century is now obsolete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zack while your comments are interesting in a kind of libertarian way, your wrong, Congress can raise funds and spend them as they see fit.</p>
<p>The Constitution was not meant to be a document written in stone as an absolute. Witness amendments that have been added over the years. </p>
<p>I could argue that the 2nd amendment, which was a response to the British efforts to disarm their militias in the late 18th century is now obsolete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Capizzo</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-2#comment-21243</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Capizzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21243</guid>
		<description>The feds  should  create a national job bank for 10,000,000 for a year at about $500,000,000.  Immediately re-employ out of that fund laid off government and university people.  Select other areas where the work needs to be done sooner or later for the private sector and create New Deal type work projects.

In that year have a new Bretton Woods to stabilize currencies, replace the Federal Reserve with the U.S. Mint, nationalize failed banks (as William Black said should be done by law), and get rid of Reaganonmics (outsourcing jobs to China, Mexico, etc, deregulation (eg banks to big to fail created by gutting antitrust), anti unions, budget busting tax cuts for the wealthy, an out of control military-industrial complex).  

I said this months ago and little of it has been done and the economy is still shedding near one half million jobs a month.  Check out William Black on Bill Moyers.  So many callers to AirAmerica and NPR ask that the jobs be brought back from China and Mexico but I rarely hear it from Presidents, governors, or Congressman (actually only Dennis Kucinich and Bernie Saunders).  The rest are all corrupt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The feds  should  create a national job bank for 10,000,000 for a year at about $500,000,000.  Immediately re-employ out of that fund laid off government and university people.  Select other areas where the work needs to be done sooner or later for the private sector and create New Deal type work projects.</p>
<p>In that year have a new Bretton Woods to stabilize currencies, replace the Federal Reserve with the U.S. Mint, nationalize failed banks (as William Black said should be done by law), and get rid of Reaganonmics (outsourcing jobs to China, Mexico, etc, deregulation (eg banks to big to fail created by gutting antitrust), anti unions, budget busting tax cuts for the wealthy, an out of control military-industrial complex).  </p>
<p>I said this months ago and little of it has been done and the economy is still shedding near one half million jobs a month.  Check out William Black on Bill Moyers.  So many callers to AirAmerica and NPR ask that the jobs be brought back from China and Mexico but I rarely hear it from Presidents, governors, or Congressman (actually only Dennis Kucinich and Bernie Saunders).  The rest are all corrupt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zack</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-2#comment-21235</link>
		<dc:creator>zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21235</guid>
		<description>Wow nice pro-stimulus propaganda. Never have I heard so much Keynesian garbage in a single hour.  Next time, why don&#039;t you invite some real economists (Austrian economists like Peter Schiff, Jim Rogers, Tom Woods) on that actually understand economics. I suggest that everyone google &quot;How an economy grows and why it doesn&#039;t&quot; and read Irwin Schiff&#039;s simple comic for 15 minutes to learn simple economics.

The government &#039;stimulus&#039; hurts the economy, for every dollar the government spends on stimulus, is a dollar coming out of the *productive* sector. Even if we borrow the money, that money can no longer be borrowed by private industry to grow. Japan tried this stimulus nonsense for years - they paved every road in their country, and they still have NO economic growth since the 80s. Google the &quot;Lost Decade&quot;? 

And yes, a lot of the stimulus money is going to politically connected cronies to be wasted on useless &quot;projects&quot;. Look how $400K of Americorps money was spend on washing the boss&#039; car (Google Kevin Johnson Americorps car wash). Don&#039;t you think this money would be better left in the hands of the citizenry to spend as they see fit?

Lastly, I know that no one really cares about the rule of law any more, but perhaps it&#039;s worth noting, that stimulus spending is not authorized anywhere in the Constitution. You know, that document that&#039;s supposed to be the foundation of all our laws. Try reading it sometime and you&#039;ll see that 99% of what the Federal Govt. does is expressly NOT ALLOWED by the 10th Amendment.

Here&#039;s what we need to do to fix the economy - 

#1 recall and replace 90% of the congress, both GOP and Dem. Anyone that voted for the bailouts should be the first to go

#2 with the new Congress, dramatically CUT spending in the Federal government, and the first place to start is in the Defense budget. We should pull out of Iraq, Afghanistan, Germany, Japan, Korea, and cancel more weapons programs. We are all cutting back on our spending, so too should the federal government.

#3 cut federal income taxes commensurate with the budget cuts

#4 return to Constitutional small government</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow nice pro-stimulus propaganda. Never have I heard so much Keynesian garbage in a single hour.  Next time, why don&#8217;t you invite some real economists (Austrian economists like Peter Schiff, Jim Rogers, Tom Woods) on that actually understand economics. I suggest that everyone google &#8220;How an economy grows and why it doesn&#8217;t&#8221; and read Irwin Schiff&#8217;s simple comic for 15 minutes to learn simple economics.</p>
<p>The government &#8217;stimulus&#8217; hurts the economy, for every dollar the government spends on stimulus, is a dollar coming out of the *productive* sector. Even if we borrow the money, that money can no longer be borrowed by private industry to grow. Japan tried this stimulus nonsense for years &#8211; they paved every road in their country, and they still have NO economic growth since the 80s. Google the &#8220;Lost Decade&#8221;? </p>
<p>And yes, a lot of the stimulus money is going to politically connected cronies to be wasted on useless &#8220;projects&#8221;. Look how $400K of Americorps money was spend on washing the boss&#8217; car (Google Kevin Johnson Americorps car wash). Don&#8217;t you think this money would be better left in the hands of the citizenry to spend as they see fit?</p>
<p>Lastly, I know that no one really cares about the rule of law any more, but perhaps it&#8217;s worth noting, that stimulus spending is not authorized anywhere in the Constitution. You know, that document that&#8217;s supposed to be the foundation of all our laws. Try reading it sometime and you&#8217;ll see that 99% of what the Federal Govt. does is expressly NOT ALLOWED by the 10th Amendment.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what we need to do to fix the economy &#8211; </p>
<p>#1 recall and replace 90% of the congress, both GOP and Dem. Anyone that voted for the bailouts should be the first to go</p>
<p>#2 with the new Congress, dramatically CUT spending in the Federal government, and the first place to start is in the Defense budget. We should pull out of Iraq, Afghanistan, Germany, Japan, Korea, and cancel more weapons programs. We are all cutting back on our spending, so too should the federal government.</p>
<p>#3 cut federal income taxes commensurate with the budget cuts</p>
<p>#4 return to Constitutional small government</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-1#comment-21178</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21178</guid>
		<description>Accept a 10 percent decline in standard of living?  Mandate a decreased level of worker productivity?  Give mortgages a &quot;haircut&quot;?  This show had me howling mad and I&#039;m a little dissapointed in you Tom.  Comments like the above deserve to be checked a little more forcefully than &quot;gee, I don&#039;t know...&quot;  I can listen all day long to idiot blowhards on the radio but this show had me sitting in stunned silence the rest of the day.  These people are dangerous, just as much as the neocons were when they had the run of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Accept a 10 percent decline in standard of living?  Mandate a decreased level of worker productivity?  Give mortgages a &#8220;haircut&#8221;?  This show had me howling mad and I&#8217;m a little dissapointed in you Tom.  Comments like the above deserve to be checked a little more forcefully than &#8220;gee, I don&#8217;t know&#8230;&#8221;  I can listen all day long to idiot blowhards on the radio but this show had me sitting in stunned silence the rest of the day.  These people are dangerous, just as much as the neocons were when they had the run of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Koester</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-1#comment-21169</link>
		<dc:creator>John Koester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21169</guid>
		<description>When George the second became President, I had a full time job and was able to live comfortably, at least by my expectations. I now work two part time jobs, no benefits, no real expectations of any improvement in the near future. I have always lived under my income, so the only real debt I have is a medical bill(health insurance would have been twentyfive percent of my takehome pay back when my one current job was fulltime).
   So now we reward the people who:spent more than they earned, got bonuses for persuading other people to live beyond their means, or ran ponzi schemes and got out while the going is good. I have slipped from the lower middle class to the working poor, and now I&#039;m told it&#039;s my duty to spend money I don&#039;t have to make the economy improve for the people on top. To paraphrase an old Warren Zevon song &quot;If you do they&#039;ll screw you, if you don&#039;t, they&#039;ll screw you too&quot;. 
  When is all this stimulus going to trickle down to people like me?
John Koester</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When George the second became President, I had a full time job and was able to live comfortably, at least by my expectations. I now work two part time jobs, no benefits, no real expectations of any improvement in the near future. I have always lived under my income, so the only real debt I have is a medical bill(health insurance would have been twentyfive percent of my takehome pay back when my one current job was fulltime).<br />
   So now we reward the people who:spent more than they earned, got bonuses for persuading other people to live beyond their means, or ran ponzi schemes and got out while the going is good. I have slipped from the lower middle class to the working poor, and now I&#8217;m told it&#8217;s my duty to spend money I don&#8217;t have to make the economy improve for the people on top. To paraphrase an old Warren Zevon song &#8220;If you do they&#8217;ll screw you, if you don&#8217;t, they&#8217;ll screw you too&#8221;.<br />
  When is all this stimulus going to trickle down to people like me?<br />
John Koester</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putney Swope</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-1#comment-21164</link>
		<dc:creator>Putney Swope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21164</guid>
		<description>While Germany and France are hardly out of the recession both countries seem to be doing something right.

France has pumped a lot of money into shovel ready projects on infrastructure and construction which is already putting some of the unemployed back to work and there unemployment is below ours at about 8.5%.

Germany announced growth in exports while it is lower than they want it shows that they are heading out of the recession. Both countries have extensive social programs for both health care and unemployment, retraining and so on. 

So if the French can do this why can&#039;t we?
What&#039;s wrong with this country? 
Why is our government so dysfunctional?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Germany and France are hardly out of the recession both countries seem to be doing something right.</p>
<p>France has pumped a lot of money into shovel ready projects on infrastructure and construction which is already putting some of the unemployed back to work and there unemployment is below ours at about 8.5%.</p>
<p>Germany announced growth in exports while it is lower than they want it shows that they are heading out of the recession. Both countries have extensive social programs for both health care and unemployment, retraining and so on. </p>
<p>So if the French can do this why can&#8217;t we?<br />
What&#8217;s wrong with this country?<br />
Why is our government so dysfunctional?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe B.</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-1#comment-21163</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21163</guid>
		<description>The entire Obama economic team (Tim Geithner, Larry Summers, and Christina Romer) has been a total failure. They should all be fired immediately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The entire Obama economic team (Tim Geithner, Larry Summers, and Christina Romer) has been a total failure. They should all be fired immediately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Galinsky</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-1#comment-21161</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Galinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21161</guid>
		<description>The simple truth is that this country stopped producing real goods - we outsourced manufacturing, import foreign labor to replace the middle class, and now it turns out our &quot;services&quot; are not that essential for the world economy. Our politicians turned us into a nation of lazy consumers, we printed worthless currency to pay for our consumption, and everybody thought that this will last forever.

The only way to turn economy around is to bring back the industries that made this country great. In order to do this we need to get rid of &quot;experts&quot; and politicians who got us into this mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The simple truth is that this country stopped producing real goods &#8211; we outsourced manufacturing, import foreign labor to replace the middle class, and now it turns out our &#8220;services&#8221; are not that essential for the world economy. Our politicians turned us into a nation of lazy consumers, we printed worthless currency to pay for our consumption, and everybody thought that this will last forever.</p>
<p>The only way to turn economy around is to bring back the industries that made this country great. In order to do this we need to get rid of &#8220;experts&#8221; and politicians who got us into this mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Greisen</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-1#comment-21160</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Greisen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21160</guid>
		<description>Bush/Paulson&#039;s  main stimulus - the 3 page outline to payoff Wall ST the 1st 2 times.  

Stimuli must be directed to those at the lowest income level + create jobs that put people to work in high unemployment rate areas.  Only if disabled, elderly &amp; long-term unemployed would push money into the economy as quickly as possible..

Those who want it to go as a high-earner tax break for &quot;investment&quot; forget that their business investments won&#039;t go far if their customers &amp; their customers&#039; customers don&#039;t have the $$$ to  buy their products/services.

Bush kept it too siimple &amp; paid off his friends &amp; donors the simplest way possible via Paulson.  Pres. Obama /Geithner have not only made things too complicated + they paid off Wall ST again &amp; didn&#039;t touch the real economy with instant mortgage help + more cash to the lowest income/most numerous consumer base.

Dean Baker has it right, POTUS &amp; VP took the &quot;consensus&quot; instead of one of  the worst possible case.  They underestimated the real economic problem &amp; not the Wall ST/Bank problem that has been solved approx 5x now. 1) Bush/Paulson 2) bailouts 3) bailout 2 4) the multi-Trillion Treasury program  &amp; 5) AIG, GM, Chrysler  - etc. which all pay back to the largest banks. So hit 5x &amp; the real economy hasn&#039;t gotten touched except for the &quot;rebate&quot; checks of GWB &amp; BHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush/Paulson&#8217;s  main stimulus &#8211; the 3 page outline to payoff Wall ST the 1st 2 times.  </p>
<p>Stimuli must be directed to those at the lowest income level + create jobs that put people to work in high unemployment rate areas.  Only if disabled, elderly &amp; long-term unemployed would push money into the economy as quickly as possible..</p>
<p>Those who want it to go as a high-earner tax break for &#8220;investment&#8221; forget that their business investments won&#8217;t go far if their customers &amp; their customers&#8217; customers don&#8217;t have the $$$ to  buy their products/services.</p>
<p>Bush kept it too siimple &amp; paid off his friends &amp; donors the simplest way possible via Paulson.  Pres. Obama /Geithner have not only made things too complicated + they paid off Wall ST again &amp; didn&#8217;t touch the real economy with instant mortgage help + more cash to the lowest income/most numerous consumer base.</p>
<p>Dean Baker has it right, POTUS &amp; VP took the &#8220;consensus&#8221; instead of one of  the worst possible case.  They underestimated the real economic problem &amp; not the Wall ST/Bank problem that has been solved approx 5x now. 1) Bush/Paulson 2) bailouts 3) bailout 2 4) the multi-Trillion Treasury program  &amp; 5) AIG, GM, Chrysler  &#8211; etc. which all pay back to the largest banks. So hit 5x &amp; the real economy hasn&#8217;t gotten touched except for the &#8220;rebate&#8221; checks of GWB &amp; BHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EmploymentOverrated</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-1#comment-21159</link>
		<dc:creator>EmploymentOverrated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21159</guid>
		<description>They said on the show that it&#039;s a tragedy to have millions of people unemployed, and 10% unemployment is horrible and things along the same lines, so that&#039;s why we need to spend money to keep that from happening. 

Here&#039;s my thought on this: 

Unemployment is bad because people need money to support themselves and pay for things.  

Well, how about forgiving people&#039;s debts, so they don&#039;t have to pay some of their bills? Like govt forgave banks, let banks forgive debtors. 

And how about mandating that if a couple of people with kids are both unemployed or if a single parent is unemployed, making it mandatory to hire at least one of the parents?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They said on the show that it&#8217;s a tragedy to have millions of people unemployed, and 10% unemployment is horrible and things along the same lines, so that&#8217;s why we need to spend money to keep that from happening. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my thought on this: </p>
<p>Unemployment is bad because people need money to support themselves and pay for things.  </p>
<p>Well, how about forgiving people&#8217;s debts, so they don&#8217;t have to pay some of their bills? Like govt forgave banks, let banks forgive debtors. </p>
<p>And how about mandating that if a couple of people with kids are both unemployed or if a single parent is unemployed, making it mandatory to hire at least one of the parents?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Pjecha Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-1#comment-21158</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Pjecha Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21158</guid>
		<description>In The Book of Proverbs King Solomon once said … “The borrower is the lenders slave”. And the simple truth is—one can’t borrow from his master to purchase and obtain his lost liberty … one must pay it off.  Yet America as a nation continues to borrow from her global masters, and by so doing, is sacrificing to bondage the lives, wealth and futures of her children and grandchildren.  The current failing stimulus package was in no way intended for us to use to pay off our individual household or state debt, but rather to buy those things we’re slowly coming to realize we have no real need of.  For our real need is not for more foreign stuff … but for liberty from this bitter bondage for ourselves and future generations of Americans. And not hollow consumerism, nor borrowing more from our current or future masters, can or will ever set us at liberty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In The Book of Proverbs King Solomon once said … “The borrower is the lenders slave”. And the simple truth is—one can’t borrow from his master to purchase and obtain his lost liberty … one must pay it off.  Yet America as a nation continues to borrow from her global masters, and by so doing, is sacrificing to bondage the lives, wealth and futures of her children and grandchildren.  The current failing stimulus package was in no way intended for us to use to pay off our individual household or state debt, but rather to buy those things we’re slowly coming to realize we have no real need of.  For our real need is not for more foreign stuff … but for liberty from this bitter bondage for ourselves and future generations of Americans. And not hollow consumerism, nor borrowing more from our current or future masters, can or will ever set us at liberty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-1#comment-21155</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21155</guid>
		<description>You people have not seen nothing yet. Capitol Hill is now totally owned by the Dems. This has not happened since the Carter days I believe, and do any of you remember those days? What scares me, is there is no check and balance so to speak. This could be a snow ball rolling down the hill to hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people have not seen nothing yet. Capitol Hill is now totally owned by the Dems. This has not happened since the Carter days I believe, and do any of you remember those days? What scares me, is there is no check and balance so to speak. This could be a snow ball rolling down the hill to hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martyn Strong</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-1#comment-21147</link>
		<dc:creator>Martyn Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21147</guid>
		<description>What we need is regulation and here is how:

Capital markets are unstable. In the past there was no way to make them stable. But today we have computer power that can be used to make them stable.

By using the greater computer power of today we can have a much higher turn over of capital in the capital market. This higher turnover will make the market harder to game or control and the market will no longer have the unstable run ups or declines. Who can change or control the market when say 20% of the capital is trading each day?

So now that we have the compute power to provide for all these transactions that will smooth out the market how do we force people to turn over at a rate of 20% a day? Easy, put a cap gains tax of 0% (zero) on all gains of 7 days or less and put a cap gains tax of 90% of all gains of more than 7 days.

The likes of Yahoo, Micosoft and/or Sun Micro Systems will give us the systems that will provide automated software agents to support turning over one&#039;s investments every 7 days (based on the specs you give the agent).

A system like this will make the financial markets work as smoothly as the local fruit market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we need is regulation and here is how:</p>
<p>Capital markets are unstable. In the past there was no way to make them stable. But today we have computer power that can be used to make them stable.</p>
<p>By using the greater computer power of today we can have a much higher turn over of capital in the capital market. This higher turnover will make the market harder to game or control and the market will no longer have the unstable run ups or declines. Who can change or control the market when say 20% of the capital is trading each day?</p>
<p>So now that we have the compute power to provide for all these transactions that will smooth out the market how do we force people to turn over at a rate of 20% a day? Easy, put a cap gains tax of 0% (zero) on all gains of 7 days or less and put a cap gains tax of 90% of all gains of more than 7 days.</p>
<p>The likes of Yahoo, Micosoft and/or Sun Micro Systems will give us the systems that will provide automated software agents to support turning over one&#8217;s investments every 7 days (based on the specs you give the agent).</p>
<p>A system like this will make the financial markets work as smoothly as the local fruit market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putney Swope</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-1#comment-21142</link>
		<dc:creator>Putney Swope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21142</guid>
		<description>Are our taxes high? Well for our return on the dollar I would agree.

In some European countries they pay a lot more in taxes but get more in return, good health care and free or cheap higher education, excellent public education.

So it is relative. The rise in sales tax in Massachusetts might hurt the economy, but people are already cutting back. I know I am. The last time time bought a shirt I went to a second hand store and picked up 3 shirts for $10.

Perfectly good shirts as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are our taxes high? Well for our return on the dollar I would agree.</p>
<p>In some European countries they pay a lot more in taxes but get more in return, good health care and free or cheap higher education, excellent public education.</p>
<p>So it is relative. The rise in sales tax in Massachusetts might hurt the economy, but people are already cutting back. I know I am. The last time time bought a shirt I went to a second hand store and picked up 3 shirts for $10.</p>
<p>Perfectly good shirts as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-1#comment-21141</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21141</guid>
		<description>No Putney - it is not the issue whether I like to pay taxes or not. Right now the issue is whehter this tax increase contributes to the economic recovery or hurts it. My moving to NH would not change the fact that people strapped for cash as it is would have to plank out more for taxes without any commensurate improvement in services. And we already pay for this civilized society. Taxes are not low as it is, considering that we have to pay out of pocket for health care, education and retirement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Putney &#8211; it is not the issue whether I like to pay taxes or not. Right now the issue is whehter this tax increase contributes to the economic recovery or hurts it. My moving to NH would not change the fact that people strapped for cash as it is would have to plank out more for taxes without any commensurate improvement in services. And we already pay for this civilized society. Taxes are not low as it is, considering that we have to pay out of pocket for health care, education and retirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PW</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-1#comment-21135</link>
		<dc:creator>PW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21135</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, corporations are greedily doing whatever they want without any government intervention.  In many cases, their greed is doing a lot of individuals and the economy serious harm -- as for example (just heard this) Blue Cross raising its rates next month by 17%.  How many people, already stretched to the limit, will simply have to drop their health insurance?  What about some credit card companies doubling their minimum payments starting in September?  What will that do a) the economy and b) millions of people struggling to stay afloat until they can pay down their debt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, corporations are greedily doing whatever they want without any government intervention.  In many cases, their greed is doing a lot of individuals and the economy serious harm &#8212; as for example (just heard this) Blue Cross raising its rates next month by 17%.  How many people, already stretched to the limit, will simply have to drop their health insurance?  What about some credit card companies doubling their minimum payments starting in September?  What will that do a) the economy and b) millions of people struggling to stay afloat until they can pay down their debt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putney Swope</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-1#comment-21134</link>
		<dc:creator>Putney Swope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21134</guid>
		<description>Alex where you lived before is not the issue. 
It&#039;s taxes. You don&#039;t seem like you want to pay them or are not into paying them.
Why not move to a state, such as New Hampshire, and then the problem is solved.  However you will find that the property taxes are higher in New Hampshire when compared to
Massachusetts. Your going to pay one way or another.
Personally I want more bang for my buck, as David states that to much money is going towards the military and so on. 

&quot;Taxes are what we pay for civilized society.&#039;&#039; — Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex where you lived before is not the issue.<br />
It&#8217;s taxes. You don&#8217;t seem like you want to pay them or are not into paying them.<br />
Why not move to a state, such as New Hampshire, and then the problem is solved.  However you will find that the property taxes are higher in New Hampshire when compared to<br />
Massachusetts. Your going to pay one way or another.<br />
Personally I want more bang for my buck, as David states that to much money is going towards the military and so on. </p>
<p>&#8220;Taxes are what we pay for civilized society.&#8221; — Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/a-second-stimulus-package/comment-page-1#comment-21127</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14690#comment-21127</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll start by saying I&#039;m not an economist, nor to do I know if the points I am about to bring up are factual but I feel the need to hear more on the topic.

I&#039;d like to see more discussion on why we are at this point in the economy and that instead of trying to artificially correct it, that maybe this is the way it needs to be to correct itself.
   
An unwarranted war debt, and the financial industries greedy lending practices notwithstanding, I feel the problem is Americans pursuit of spending beyond our means.  Examples being large credit debt and no savings, mortgages we can&#039;t afford, wanting less expensive goods from outside the country instead paying the American price....the list goes on.  Let me admit right here that I count myself among this group.   While Americans do continue to work hard, be inventive, and creating the cutting edge there is no denying as a whole we have grown into a society of wanting/expecting more than we&#039;ve earned.   An unfortunate result of this society of excess is we’ve also come to expect to be saved from our mistakes instead of paying for them.

I’d offer that maybe our current economic situation is our society’s way of correcting itself.     Maybe our society needs to dig itself out, suffer this hardship, and use the lessons to improve itself instead waiting for more handouts from the government to make things right.  We should also consider that such adversity breeds ingenuity.  I’m also no historian, but I suspect many a great invention and strong moral character was created as a result of the Great Depression.  I would also suspect that these hardships can strengthen this country’s great need for better family values.  Society would be forced to rely on those close to them instead of a government bailout.  I’m all for social programs for those who truly cannot help themselves.  I am not for programs that just prolong the problem instead of fixing it.  
Therefore I say, “More Stimulus? No!”  Continuing to spending money we don’t have is the very essence of the problem that put us here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll start by saying I&#8217;m not an economist, nor to do I know if the points I am about to bring up are factual but I feel the need to hear more on the topic.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see more discussion on why we are at this point in the economy and that instead of trying to artificially correct it, that maybe this is the way it needs to be to correct itself.</p>
<p>An unwarranted war debt, and the financial industries greedy lending practices notwithstanding, I feel the problem is Americans pursuit of spending beyond our means.  Examples being large credit debt and no savings, mortgages we can&#8217;t afford, wanting less expensive goods from outside the country instead paying the American price&#8230;.the list goes on.  Let me admit right here that I count myself among this group.   While Americans do continue to work hard, be inventive, and creating the cutting edge there is no denying as a whole we have grown into a society of wanting/expecting more than we&#8217;ve earned.   An unfortunate result of this society of excess is we’ve also come to expect to be saved from our mistakes instead of paying for them.</p>
<p>I’d offer that maybe our current economic situation is our society’s way of correcting itself.     Maybe our society needs to dig itself out, suffer this hardship, and use the lessons to improve itself instead waiting for more handouts from the government to make things right.  We should also consider that such adversity breeds ingenuity.  I’m also no historian, but I suspect many a great invention and strong moral character was created as a result of the Great Depression.  I would also suspect that these hardships can strengthen this country’s great need for better family values.  Society would be forced to rely on those close to them instead of a government bailout.  I’m all for social programs for those who truly cannot help themselves.  I am not for programs that just prolong the problem instead of fixing it.<br />
Therefore I say, “More Stimulus? No!”  Continuing to spending money we don’t have is the very essence of the problem that put us here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
