<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Case for Kindness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness</link>
	<description>On Point is a live, two-hour morning news-analysis program, produced by WBUR 90.9 and NPR.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:01:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: justanother</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-21017</link>
		<dc:creator>justanother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 17:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-21017</guid>
		<description>****In fact, a stronger world would also be a kinder world.****

Agree.

Only when we build up our trust by setting our final goal toward peace, and really looking into our intention and final action and compromise (give and take) to reach our peace.  And that would be a stronger and kinder world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>****In fact, a stronger world would also be a kinder world.****</p>
<p>Agree.</p>
<p>Only when we build up our trust by setting our final goal toward peace, and really looking into our intention and final action and compromise (give and take) to reach our peace.  And that would be a stronger and kinder world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Expanded Consciousness</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20845</link>
		<dc:creator>Expanded Consciousness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20845</guid>
		<description>Ed - Nietzsche&#039;s point (quoted in the third post above) was that while everyone is against the instances where passions lead to &quot;folly&quot; and disaster, religion&#039;s prescription is &quot;excision&quot; and suppression. He is suggesting, what later became &quot;sublimination&quot; in Freud&#039;s writings, to not throw out the baby with the bath water and that the passions labelled &quot;bad&quot; can often be transformed into something good versus dismissed and excoriated. Nietzsche was against simple dichotomies (&quot;beyond good and evil&quot;) and wasn&#039;t simplistically saying that he was passionate and religion passionless. 

Applying this to the kindness topic, &quot;kindness&quot; doesn&#039;t have to be seen exclusively as a softening, as a suppression of hardness and selfish desires to free up a desire to perform a kind act. Kindness can also emanate from an unsuppressed and subliminated spirit, one overflowing with strength and the ability to extend outside oneself. The overabundant soul. This approach wides the scope when trying to account for and understand kindness. It avoids the error of simply diagnosing the modern world as in need of weakening and softening. In fact, a stronger world would also be a kinder world.

Who woulda thunk it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed &#8211; Nietzsche&#8217;s point (quoted in the third post above) was that while everyone is against the instances where passions lead to &#8220;folly&#8221; and disaster, religion&#8217;s prescription is &#8220;excision&#8221; and suppression. He is suggesting, what later became &#8220;sublimination&#8221; in Freud&#8217;s writings, to not throw out the baby with the bath water and that the passions labelled &#8220;bad&#8221; can often be transformed into something good versus dismissed and excoriated. Nietzsche was against simple dichotomies (&#8221;beyond good and evil&#8221;) and wasn&#8217;t simplistically saying that he was passionate and religion passionless. </p>
<p>Applying this to the kindness topic, &#8220;kindness&#8221; doesn&#8217;t have to be seen exclusively as a softening, as a suppression of hardness and selfish desires to free up a desire to perform a kind act. Kindness can also emanate from an unsuppressed and subliminated spirit, one overflowing with strength and the ability to extend outside oneself. The overabundant soul. This approach wides the scope when trying to account for and understand kindness. It avoids the error of simply diagnosing the modern world as in need of weakening and softening. In fact, a stronger world would also be a kinder world.</p>
<p>Who woulda thunk it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Helmrich</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20754</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Helmrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20754</guid>
		<description>It isn&#039;t right to say that religion is against passion, however: quite the contrary. It demands passion for justice, for goodness, for truth, for beauty, and for God. Just not passion for sin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t right to say that religion is against passion, however: quite the contrary. It demands passion for justice, for goodness, for truth, for beauty, and for God. Just not passion for sin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Dibble</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20742</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Dibble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20742</guid>
		<description>You can e-mail the station from the website at www.northamptontv.org.  The schedule there does not go backward.  The time of the program was July 3rd at around 11:30, but I could be off several hours, before or after.  The video production was quite amateur (I didn&#039;t see any title, for instance; there were lots of black stretches where patched), the content intriguing.  Maybe during work hours tomorrow I can call the number they give and ask. You can too.  I wasn&#039;t expecting to be so hooked (on a holiday Friday very late).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can e-mail the station from the website at <a href="http://www.northamptontv.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.northamptontv.org</a>.  The schedule there does not go backward.  The time of the program was July 3rd at around 11:30, but I could be off several hours, before or after.  The video production was quite amateur (I didn&#8217;t see any title, for instance; there were lots of black stretches where patched), the content intriguing.  Maybe during work hours tomorrow I can call the number they give and ask. You can too.  I wasn&#8217;t expecting to be so hooked (on a holiday Friday very late).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justanother</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20741</link>
		<dc:creator>justanother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20741</guid>
		<description>****The program I saw framed the revolution of Protestantism as seeding capitalism by asserting that God’s chosen people prosper financially, something like that. Many evils flow from that, according to their theory.****

Can you share the name of the program you watched, if not, it&#039;s perfectly fine.

Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>****The program I saw framed the revolution of Protestantism as seeding capitalism by asserting that God’s chosen people prosper financially, something like that. Many evils flow from that, according to their theory.****</p>
<p>Can you share the name of the program you watched, if not, it&#8217;s perfectly fine.</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Dibble</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Dibble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 22:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20735</guid>
		<description>justanother:  Beyond education here (higher education) being about success, money, I note that it skews towards privilege, the idea that you can get an advantage by the &quot;brand&quot; of your education, by the &quot;connections&quot; it provides.  This is counter to a lot of American ideology, counter to a lot of the egalitarianism we Americans profess.  The Statue of Liberty&#039;s beacon of &quot;Opportunity for All&quot; would not be about preemptive success such as terribly costly college degrees confer; such education would even tend to disable the individual&#039;s actual abilities, if you know what I mean, rather than sort of booting one&#039;s interpersonal skills.  
    I don&#039;t think you focus on K-12 education in your note, but the program I watched that so dissed capitalism seemed to see the domination by landed elites at the root of the American social and economic way of being.  So the object of K-12 education is to manipulate the masses, not to raise up critical thinkers.  Americans can have skills up to a point, no more.  
    What this crisis (these crises) bring to light, for one thing, is a question about what work Americans should be doing.  Should we revert to manufacturing?  It comes to what is a sustainable way of life, globally, and how can we equitably all participate (work at) keeping it going.  
    The program I saw said that technocrats are the problem solvers, that politicians are poised to be pushed around by the elites, not to find and solve problems.  
    I&#039;d like school (K-12) to be year-round (since kids don&#039;t need to help out on the farm, but parents work year-round), and for full-day, year-round kindergarten and preschool to be offered (again, so parents can work, and so children get an even platform of early education).
     If we could focus, as you suggest, on getting as much of the world able and participating, it would surely threaten those who do favor democracy but only as long as the options are preselected, vetted, by the ruling &quot;interests.&quot;  
     The program I saw framed the revolution of Protestantism as seeding capitalism by asserting that God&#039;s chosen people prosper financially, something like that.  Many evils flow from that, according to their theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>justanother:  Beyond education here (higher education) being about success, money, I note that it skews towards privilege, the idea that you can get an advantage by the &#8220;brand&#8221; of your education, by the &#8220;connections&#8221; it provides.  This is counter to a lot of American ideology, counter to a lot of the egalitarianism we Americans profess.  The Statue of Liberty&#8217;s beacon of &#8220;Opportunity for All&#8221; would not be about preemptive success such as terribly costly college degrees confer; such education would even tend to disable the individual&#8217;s actual abilities, if you know what I mean, rather than sort of booting one&#8217;s interpersonal skills.<br />
    I don&#8217;t think you focus on K-12 education in your note, but the program I watched that so dissed capitalism seemed to see the domination by landed elites at the root of the American social and economic way of being.  So the object of K-12 education is to manipulate the masses, not to raise up critical thinkers.  Americans can have skills up to a point, no more.<br />
    What this crisis (these crises) bring to light, for one thing, is a question about what work Americans should be doing.  Should we revert to manufacturing?  It comes to what is a sustainable way of life, globally, and how can we equitably all participate (work at) keeping it going.<br />
    The program I saw said that technocrats are the problem solvers, that politicians are poised to be pushed around by the elites, not to find and solve problems.<br />
    I&#8217;d like school (K-12) to be year-round (since kids don&#8217;t need to help out on the farm, but parents work year-round), and for full-day, year-round kindergarten and preschool to be offered (again, so parents can work, and so children get an even platform of early education).<br />
     If we could focus, as you suggest, on getting as much of the world able and participating, it would surely threaten those who do favor democracy but only as long as the options are preselected, vetted, by the ruling &#8220;interests.&#8221;<br />
     The program I saw framed the revolution of Protestantism as seeding capitalism by asserting that God&#8217;s chosen people prosper financially, something like that.  Many evils flow from that, according to their theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justanother</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20731</link>
		<dc:creator>justanother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20731</guid>
		<description>to Ellen Dibble ----

&quot;Is the capitalist system shunting our better human qualities into the realm of the “random”?&quot;  -- very well put, can&#039;t be more true than that.

I feel the same way about the random act of kindness really is not enough, it gives us the illusion of self satisfaction of being a good being.  

It is so interesting to see things and truth observation being revealed layer by layer over the years.  I came from another culture, certain American or extreme capitalism behaviors are so obviously different than other parts of the world, and it does take an outsider to recognize those behaviors right away.  I can understand why those observations are not welcomed within this culture.  So I started to adapt the culture behavior here just to fit in and that makes my days go easier.  The greatest thing coming out of this economic meltdown is bringing back the awareness of how much we have been manipulated and sold by &quot;super greed&quot; that some people started to believe it is ok to be super greedy.

I think the direction of our emphasis on &quot;education&quot; is totally wrong in lots of societies.  Most of us think the ultimate goal to education is to get a good paid, socially respected job, and be successful.  Education should be emphasized toward the goal of having independent, provocative, informative thinking, toward peace and balance.

Only when educations are accessible to most of the populations in the world, when most people are educated enough to have independent informative thinking, then labor intense jobs would be more respected and paid decently without being abused into slavery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to Ellen Dibble &#8212;-</p>
<p>&#8220;Is the capitalist system shunting our better human qualities into the realm of the “random”?&#8221;  &#8212; very well put, can&#8217;t be more true than that.</p>
<p>I feel the same way about the random act of kindness really is not enough, it gives us the illusion of self satisfaction of being a good being.  </p>
<p>It is so interesting to see things and truth observation being revealed layer by layer over the years.  I came from another culture, certain American or extreme capitalism behaviors are so obviously different than other parts of the world, and it does take an outsider to recognize those behaviors right away.  I can understand why those observations are not welcomed within this culture.  So I started to adapt the culture behavior here just to fit in and that makes my days go easier.  The greatest thing coming out of this economic meltdown is bringing back the awareness of how much we have been manipulated and sold by &#8220;super greed&#8221; that some people started to believe it is ok to be super greedy.</p>
<p>I think the direction of our emphasis on &#8220;education&#8221; is totally wrong in lots of societies.  Most of us think the ultimate goal to education is to get a good paid, socially respected job, and be successful.  Education should be emphasized toward the goal of having independent, provocative, informative thinking, toward peace and balance.</p>
<p>Only when educations are accessible to most of the populations in the world, when most people are educated enough to have independent informative thinking, then labor intense jobs would be more respected and paid decently without being abused into slavery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Dibble</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20728</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Dibble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 16:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20728</guid>
		<description>Whoever was feeling bad about criticizing people on TV, I think doing that kind of critique is healthy.  It sharpens our judgment and hurts no one.  Plus it sort of defuses any smoldering frustrations.  I get totally furious at certain politicians and anyone who pays them or lobbies them for this or that which runs counter to my views.  I might like them and respect them for this and that, but I also would love a chance to give them a piece of my mind -- or let someone more eloquent give them a piece of my mind.
    Bouncing off a piece of a program on local public access TV, isn&#039;t our culture of capitalism based on greed, taking advantage of people (exploitation -- slavery globally now worse than ever, making you plastic gizmos), buying off whole countries (they say), corruption being almost built into a capitalist system, elites preserving themselves in ways elemental to capitalism?  
   The idea was that radical restructuring around other human motivations other than the selfish (Adam Smith, right?) is in order (here and everyplace).  We need a Gandhi/Martin Luther/Martin Luther King/Saint Paul/St.Bernard dog -- I digress.  We need heavy duty philosopher/economist kings.  (Or so they were saying, and I&#039;m still on that wavelength, not yet at the throwing-slippers-at-that- particular-TV-show stage.)
   Kindness as &quot;random acts of kindness&quot; which constitute moving stories -- that may not be enough.  Perhaps if kindness were more part of our social fabric, it would not be kindness; it would be required behavior, with no name at all.  Just as it is required not to rob people on the street, or anywhere.  &quot;Am I my brother&#039;s keeper?&quot;  Is the government my brother&#039;s keeper?  Is the capitalist system shunting our better human qualities into the realm of the &quot;random&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever was feeling bad about criticizing people on TV, I think doing that kind of critique is healthy.  It sharpens our judgment and hurts no one.  Plus it sort of defuses any smoldering frustrations.  I get totally furious at certain politicians and anyone who pays them or lobbies them for this or that which runs counter to my views.  I might like them and respect them for this and that, but I also would love a chance to give them a piece of my mind &#8212; or let someone more eloquent give them a piece of my mind.<br />
    Bouncing off a piece of a program on local public access TV, isn&#8217;t our culture of capitalism based on greed, taking advantage of people (exploitation &#8212; slavery globally now worse than ever, making you plastic gizmos), buying off whole countries (they say), corruption being almost built into a capitalist system, elites preserving themselves in ways elemental to capitalism?<br />
   The idea was that radical restructuring around other human motivations other than the selfish (Adam Smith, right?) is in order (here and everyplace).  We need a Gandhi/Martin Luther/Martin Luther King/Saint Paul/St.Bernard dog &#8212; I digress.  We need heavy duty philosopher/economist kings.  (Or so they were saying, and I&#8217;m still on that wavelength, not yet at the throwing-slippers-at-that- particular-TV-show stage.)<br />
   Kindness as &#8220;random acts of kindness&#8221; which constitute moving stories &#8212; that may not be enough.  Perhaps if kindness were more part of our social fabric, it would not be kindness; it would be required behavior, with no name at all.  Just as it is required not to rob people on the street, or anywhere.  &#8220;Am I my brother&#8217;s keeper?&#8221;  Is the government my brother&#8217;s keeper?  Is the capitalist system shunting our better human qualities into the realm of the &#8220;random&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justanother</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20726</link>
		<dc:creator>justanother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20726</guid>
		<description>I love this show, it touches so many thought provoking subjects that is rare especially for recent trends of news media.

Thank you, Tom and all your teammates for your unique approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this show, it touches so many thought provoking subjects that is rare especially for recent trends of news media.</p>
<p>Thank you, Tom and all your teammates for your unique approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justanother</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20723</link>
		<dc:creator>justanother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 19:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20723</guid>
		<description>Lata Rele, it is a very moving story, I especially like the part &quot;He told her that if she really wanted to pay him back, the next time she saw someone who needed help, she could give that person the assistance they needed, and Bryan added, ‘And think of me.’&quot;  

This story reminds me of a recent commercial, when someone sees others landing helping hands, it is contagious, then it becomes a circle of goodness.

Someone pointed out earlier, kindness has 2 motives, strength &amp; weakness.  But to me, kindness is our transcended strength from our awareness of our vulnerability and weakness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lata Rele, it is a very moving story, I especially like the part &#8220;He told her that if she really wanted to pay him back, the next time she saw someone who needed help, she could give that person the assistance they needed, and Bryan added, ‘And think of me.’&#8221;  </p>
<p>This story reminds me of a recent commercial, when someone sees others landing helping hands, it is contagious, then it becomes a circle of goodness.</p>
<p>Someone pointed out earlier, kindness has 2 motives, strength &amp; weakness.  But to me, kindness is our transcended strength from our awareness of our vulnerability and weakness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lata Rele</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20671</link>
		<dc:creator>Lata Rele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20671</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed the discussion on this topic. Hopefully, everyone will read this touching story about how kindness spreads. 

One day a man saw an old lady, stranded on the side of the road, but even in the dim light of day, he could see she needed help. So he pulled up in front of her Mercedes and got out. His Pontiac was still sputtering when he approached her.

Even with the smile on his face, she was worried. No one had stopped to help for the last hour or so. Was he going to hurt her? He didn&#039;t look safe; he looked poor and hungry.

He could see that she was frightened, standing out there in the cold. He knew how she felt. It was that chill which only fear can put in you.

He said, &#039;I&#039;m here to help you, ma&#039;am. Why don&#039;t you wait in the car where it&#039;s warm? By the way, my name is Bryan Anderson .&#039;

Well, all she had was a flat tire, but for an old lady, that was bad enough. Bryan crawled under the car looking for a place to put the jack, skinning his knuckles a time or two. Soon he was able to change the tire. But he had to get dirty and his hands hurt.

As he was tightening up the lug nuts, she rolled down the window and began to talk to him. She told him that she was from St. Louis and was only just passing through.. She couldn&#039;t thank him enough for coming to her aid.

Bryan just smiled as he closed her trunk. The lady asked how much she owed him. Any amount would have been all right with her. She already imagined all the awful things that could have happened had he not stopped. Bryan never thought twice about being paid. This was not a job to him. This was helping someone in need, and God knows there were plenty, who had given him a hand in the past. He had lived his whole life that way, and it never occurred to him to act any other way.

He told her that if she really wanted to pay him back, the next time she saw someone who needed help, she could give that person the assistance they needed, and Bryan added, &#039;And think of me.&#039;

He waited until she started her car and drove off. It had been a cold and depressing day, but he felt good as he headed for home, disappearing into the twilight.

A few miles down the road the lady saw a small cafe. She went in to grab a bite to eat, and take the chill off before she made the last leg of her trip home.. It was a dingy looking restaurant. Outside were two old gas pumps The whole scene was unfamiliar to her. The waitress came over and brought a clean towel to wipe her wet hair. She had a sweet smile, one that even being on her feet for the whole day couldn&#039;t erase. The lady noticed the waitress was nearly eight months pregnant, but she never let the strain and aches change her attitude. The old lady wondered how someone who had so little could be so giving to a stranger. Then she remembered Bryan ...

After the lady finished her meal, she paid with a hundred dollar bill. The waitress quickly went to get change for her hundred dollar bill, but the old lady had slipped right out the door. She was gone by the time the waitress came back. The waitress wondered where the lady could be.Then she noticed something written on the napkin

There were tears in her eyes when she read what the lady wrote: &#039;You don&#039;t owe me anything. I have been there too. Somebody once helped me out, the way I&#039;m helping you. If you really want to pay me back, here is what you do: Do not let this chain of love end with you..&#039;

Under the napkin were four more $100 bills.

Well, there were tables to clear, sugar bowls to fill, and people to serve, but the waitress made it through another day. That night when she got home from work and climbed into bed, she was thinking about the money and what the lady had written. How could the lady have known how much she and her husband needed it? With the baby due next month, it was going to be hard.....

She knew how worried her husband was, and as he lay sleeping next to her, she gave him a soft kiss and whispered soft and low, &#039;Every thing&#039;s going to be all right. I love you, Bryan Anderson .&#039;

There is an old saying &#039;What goes around comes around.&#039;

Good friends are like stars....You don&#039;t always see them, but you know they are always there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed the discussion on this topic. Hopefully, everyone will read this touching story about how kindness spreads. </p>
<p>One day a man saw an old lady, stranded on the side of the road, but even in the dim light of day, he could see she needed help. So he pulled up in front of her Mercedes and got out. His Pontiac was still sputtering when he approached her.</p>
<p>Even with the smile on his face, she was worried. No one had stopped to help for the last hour or so. Was he going to hurt her? He didn&#8217;t look safe; he looked poor and hungry.</p>
<p>He could see that she was frightened, standing out there in the cold. He knew how she felt. It was that chill which only fear can put in you.</p>
<p>He said, &#8216;I&#8217;m here to help you, ma&#8217;am. Why don&#8217;t you wait in the car where it&#8217;s warm? By the way, my name is Bryan Anderson .&#8217;</p>
<p>Well, all she had was a flat tire, but for an old lady, that was bad enough. Bryan crawled under the car looking for a place to put the jack, skinning his knuckles a time or two. Soon he was able to change the tire. But he had to get dirty and his hands hurt.</p>
<p>As he was tightening up the lug nuts, she rolled down the window and began to talk to him. She told him that she was from St. Louis and was only just passing through.. She couldn&#8217;t thank him enough for coming to her aid.</p>
<p>Bryan just smiled as he closed her trunk. The lady asked how much she owed him. Any amount would have been all right with her. She already imagined all the awful things that could have happened had he not stopped. Bryan never thought twice about being paid. This was not a job to him. This was helping someone in need, and God knows there were plenty, who had given him a hand in the past. He had lived his whole life that way, and it never occurred to him to act any other way.</p>
<p>He told her that if she really wanted to pay him back, the next time she saw someone who needed help, she could give that person the assistance they needed, and Bryan added, &#8216;And think of me.&#8217;</p>
<p>He waited until she started her car and drove off. It had been a cold and depressing day, but he felt good as he headed for home, disappearing into the twilight.</p>
<p>A few miles down the road the lady saw a small cafe. She went in to grab a bite to eat, and take the chill off before she made the last leg of her trip home.. It was a dingy looking restaurant. Outside were two old gas pumps The whole scene was unfamiliar to her. The waitress came over and brought a clean towel to wipe her wet hair. She had a sweet smile, one that even being on her feet for the whole day couldn&#8217;t erase. The lady noticed the waitress was nearly eight months pregnant, but she never let the strain and aches change her attitude. The old lady wondered how someone who had so little could be so giving to a stranger. Then she remembered Bryan &#8230;</p>
<p>After the lady finished her meal, she paid with a hundred dollar bill. The waitress quickly went to get change for her hundred dollar bill, but the old lady had slipped right out the door. She was gone by the time the waitress came back. The waitress wondered where the lady could be.Then she noticed something written on the napkin</p>
<p>There were tears in her eyes when she read what the lady wrote: &#8216;You don&#8217;t owe me anything. I have been there too. Somebody once helped me out, the way I&#8217;m helping you. If you really want to pay me back, here is what you do: Do not let this chain of love end with you..&#8217;</p>
<p>Under the napkin were four more $100 bills.</p>
<p>Well, there were tables to clear, sugar bowls to fill, and people to serve, but the waitress made it through another day. That night when she got home from work and climbed into bed, she was thinking about the money and what the lady had written. How could the lady have known how much she and her husband needed it? With the baby due next month, it was going to be hard&#8230;..</p>
<p>She knew how worried her husband was, and as he lay sleeping next to her, she gave him a soft kiss and whispered soft and low, &#8216;Every thing&#8217;s going to be all right. I love you, Bryan Anderson .&#8217;</p>
<p>There is an old saying &#8216;What goes around comes around.&#8217;</p>
<p>Good friends are like stars&#8230;.You don&#8217;t always see them, but you know they are always there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justanother</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20670</link>
		<dc:creator>justanother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20670</guid>
		<description>I have a very personal conflict in kindness.  I found myself very unkind when it comes to criticize the people on TV, like they are not real living human. Of course they won&#039;t know my comments about them anyway.  But it is my conscience tells me I am not kind.  For example, I really really don&#039;t like Sarah Palin and what she stands for.  I have not been very kind coming out of my mouth about her.  What should I do in this instance?  Should I practice my kindness even if she doesn&#039;t care or know anything about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a very personal conflict in kindness.  I found myself very unkind when it comes to criticize the people on TV, like they are not real living human. Of course they won&#8217;t know my comments about them anyway.  But it is my conscience tells me I am not kind.  For example, I really really don&#8217;t like Sarah Palin and what she stands for.  I have not been very kind coming out of my mouth about her.  What should I do in this instance?  Should I practice my kindness even if she doesn&#8217;t care or know anything about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justanother</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20658</link>
		<dc:creator>justanother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20658</guid>
		<description>Kindness is also having benefit of doubt, respect, giving space for the person you feel he/she is requiring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kindness is also having benefit of doubt, respect, giving space for the person you feel he/she is requiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justanother</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20654</link>
		<dc:creator>Justanother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20654</guid>
		<description>A saying well put --- &quot;We judge ourselves by our intention, others judge us by our behaviors.&quot;

Started from childhood, most people want to fit in, therefore we end up speaking, acting, and thinking (debatable) like people around us, even if at the end of a day, your conscience signals you that something is just not right.  Next day, we wake up, start our day just like yesterday, this way we get around easier.   When you hear yourself and others&#039; conversations, most of them are wasteful and junky.  Every person on this planet earth should practice silence every so often, by doing so will clear our thought, conscience, and soon you will find yourself not being so reactive anymore, which is very beneficial. 
Don&#039;t we find ourselves being overly reactive always end up losing our internal and external battle.

We clean our body everyday for refreshment, we should do that for our soul, experiencing silence can put things in perspective.  Energy is good, but too  much energy can be destructive.

Unfortunately plenty of people grew up with air filled with noises and constant moving energy, our mind become so pumped up on steroid.   We don&#039;t know what to do with silence, which makes a lot of people feel uncomfortable, they associate silence as warning or alarming.  

Silence is the water that cleanse our mind.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A saying well put &#8212; &#8220;We judge ourselves by our intention, others judge us by our behaviors.&#8221;</p>
<p>Started from childhood, most people want to fit in, therefore we end up speaking, acting, and thinking (debatable) like people around us, even if at the end of a day, your conscience signals you that something is just not right.  Next day, we wake up, start our day just like yesterday, this way we get around easier.   When you hear yourself and others&#8217; conversations, most of them are wasteful and junky.  Every person on this planet earth should practice silence every so often, by doing so will clear our thought, conscience, and soon you will find yourself not being so reactive anymore, which is very beneficial.<br />
Don&#8217;t we find ourselves being overly reactive always end up losing our internal and external battle.</p>
<p>We clean our body everyday for refreshment, we should do that for our soul, experiencing silence can put things in perspective.  Energy is good, but too  much energy can be destructive.</p>
<p>Unfortunately plenty of people grew up with air filled with noises and constant moving energy, our mind become so pumped up on steroid.   We don&#8217;t know what to do with silence, which makes a lot of people feel uncomfortable, they associate silence as warning or alarming.  </p>
<p>Silence is the water that cleanse our mind.  <img src='http://www.onpointradio.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20630</link>
		<dc:creator>william</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20630</guid>
		<description>Sometimes the irony stands up, does a back flip, and smacks you full in the face.
   Thanks for the strong poem, BB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes the irony stands up, does a back flip, and smacks you full in the face.<br />
   Thanks for the strong poem, BB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janice Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20625</link>
		<dc:creator>Janice Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20625</guid>
		<description>Kindness first needs to be given to ourselves.  If we were kind to ourselves, we would be happier.  We could then extend that kindness to others.

Reaching out to others with emptiness inside only leads to hollow promises of kindness, a shell of a smile.

Do or say something kind to yourself today and everyday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kindness first needs to be given to ourselves.  If we were kind to ourselves, we would be happier.  We could then extend that kindness to others.</p>
<p>Reaching out to others with emptiness inside only leads to hollow promises of kindness, a shell of a smile.</p>
<p>Do or say something kind to yourself today and everyday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Dibble</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20612</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Dibble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20612</guid>
		<description>Maggie pretty well tied in a bow kindness as expressed through us in government (or not).  (Wow.)  I want to point out two things.  One:  donor fatigue, where with 6 billion people, if you ached for every troubled, sick, mistreated indiidual you&#039;d be flattened.  I think we are manipulated by the media, by churches, National People with [Disease} Day maybe to focus on some, but more crucially to bypass all the other sufferers without today&#039;s disease.
     Two:  someone said &quot;kindness is action.&quot;  I think the best kindness goes under the radar, just as the worst cruelty does.  It evades easy reportage or the gaze that looks and is shocked (by cruelty) or impressed (by kindness).  I just read through a &quot;Junie B&quot; book for children where the main point is that Junie gets in as much trouble for &quot;thinking&quot; insulting thoughts &quot;at&quot; the girl next to her.  The teacher blames her for the thoughts.  Personally, I have found that people calling me names is a call to interaction, a somewhat awkward preteen-type goad, but not something to suppress, even the thought of.  Let it out.  Let the person engage in the interaction, get it out there.
   A few days ago I saw the nonaction kindness in play very impressively.  Imagine a medical office where people have to wait for hours, with a tech apiece, more or less.  There is space to be separate, or to be together.  You sort of get to know the others but can pretend to be doing crosswords.  One woman, a new patient, displayed a rather &quot;dirty&quot; look in my direction.  I had sort of signed off into personal space by calling to my tech &quot;what is a word for &#039;get out of here&#039;? &#039;Zapper&#039;?  I think my tech took the cue to go to her office.  But the new patient maybe thought I was being rude, or had been rude by being chatty with my tech.  The new patient was sort of alone.  But after that, she and her tech sort of opened up to one another, and my tech spoke to her a few times.  Things got several degrees warmer interpersonally.  Actually, I got another jolt when I thought I had offended a second patient, not that he showed it.  I revisited all the things he might have overheard (parts thereof), and was relieved to see him settle in, sort of find his place.
    So much of that was intuitive.  Had one person not displayed her displeasure, however off-point her feeling was, the sequence of minute signals that corrected the situation could not get triggered.  Or probably it would, but I am noting my part anyway.
   And the particular mutual adaptations of the afternoon, mostly wordless, often without any revealing expressions, certainly no acknowledgements, are the essence of kindness but are not &quot;actions.&quot;
   So can name-calling without anything being said be punished in third grade?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maggie pretty well tied in a bow kindness as expressed through us in government (or not).  (Wow.)  I want to point out two things.  One:  donor fatigue, where with 6 billion people, if you ached for every troubled, sick, mistreated indiidual you&#8217;d be flattened.  I think we are manipulated by the media, by churches, National People with [Disease} Day maybe to focus on some, but more crucially to bypass all the other sufferers without today&#8217;s disease.<br />
     Two:  someone said &#8220;kindness is action.&#8221;  I think the best kindness goes under the radar, just as the worst cruelty does.  It evades easy reportage or the gaze that looks and is shocked (by cruelty) or impressed (by kindness).  I just read through a &#8220;Junie B&#8221; book for children where the main point is that Junie gets in as much trouble for &#8220;thinking&#8221; insulting thoughts &#8220;at&#8221; the girl next to her.  The teacher blames her for the thoughts.  Personally, I have found that people calling me names is a call to interaction, a somewhat awkward preteen-type goad, but not something to suppress, even the thought of.  Let it out.  Let the person engage in the interaction, get it out there.<br />
   A few days ago I saw the nonaction kindness in play very impressively.  Imagine a medical office where people have to wait for hours, with a tech apiece, more or less.  There is space to be separate, or to be together.  You sort of get to know the others but can pretend to be doing crosswords.  One woman, a new patient, displayed a rather &#8220;dirty&#8221; look in my direction.  I had sort of signed off into personal space by calling to my tech &#8220;what is a word for &#8216;get out of here&#8217;? &#8216;Zapper&#8217;?  I think my tech took the cue to go to her office.  But the new patient maybe thought I was being rude, or had been rude by being chatty with my tech.  The new patient was sort of alone.  But after that, she and her tech sort of opened up to one another, and my tech spoke to her a few times.  Things got several degrees warmer interpersonally.  Actually, I got another jolt when I thought I had offended a second patient, not that he showed it.  I revisited all the things he might have overheard (parts thereof), and was relieved to see him settle in, sort of find his place.<br />
    So much of that was intuitive.  Had one person not displayed her displeasure, however off-point her feeling was, the sequence of minute signals that corrected the situation could not get triggered.  Or probably it would, but I am noting my part anyway.<br />
   And the particular mutual adaptations of the afternoon, mostly wordless, often without any revealing expressions, certainly no acknowledgements, are the essence of kindness but are not &#8220;actions.&#8221;<br />
   So can name-calling without anything being said be punished in third grade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William S. Hamrick</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20610</link>
		<dc:creator>William S. Hamrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20610</guid>
		<description>This program was the first I have heard of this book, and I&#039;m looking forward to reading it.  Almost all of the points raised in listener comments, especially those by &quot;Expanded Consciousness,&quot; as well as much more, are discussed thoroughly in my KINDNESS AND THE GOOD SOCIETY, CONNECTIONS OF THE HEART (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2002).  This book is a full-fledged philosophical treatment of kindness, and it contains many, many examples from literature, art, poetry, and psychotherapy.  

Some of these cases are indeed puzzling. In Ibsen&#039;s A DOLL&#039;S HOUSE, Nora tells her husband that he had done her &quot;a great wrong,&quot; although he had been very kind to her. In Frederick Douglass&#039; great autobiography (LIFE AND TIMES OF FREDERICK DOUGLASS) includes the following passage: &quot;[T]he kindness of the slave-master only gilded the chain.  It detracted nothing from its weight or strength. The thought that men are made for other and better uses than slavery throve best under the gentle treatment of a kind master.&quot; And in THE ADVENTURES OF HUCKLEBERRY FINN, after Jim, the runaway slave, has been recaptured, the local doctor describes Jim to his friends as follows:  &quot;I see plain enough he&#039;d be working main hard lately. I liked the nigger for that; I tell you, gentlemen, a nigger like that is worth a thousand dollars--and kind treatment, too.&quot;  

These and other cases raise knotty problems. For example, if some cases of kindness are morally good while others are evil, how do we tell the difference? Is it always the case that, as Beverly states, &quot;We know when it [kindness] is demonstrated to us?&quot; How do we know?  What is it, exactly, that makes an action or refusal to act really kind as opposed to clever deception?  What makes a person as opposed to a particular act kind, and how is it that kind people can do very unkind things? How is it possible that we can deceive ourselves when we think, mistakenly, that we have done someone a kindness?  

Since &quot;Expanded Consciousness&quot; has so ably quoted Nietzsche, I will close with another quotation from that &quot;master of suspicion,&quot; as Paul Ricoeur referred to him.  &quot;The proficiency of our finest scholars, their heedless industry, their heads smoking day and night, their very craftsmanship--how often the real meaning of all this lies in the desire to keep something hidden from oneself!&quot; --ON THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This program was the first I have heard of this book, and I&#8217;m looking forward to reading it.  Almost all of the points raised in listener comments, especially those by &#8220;Expanded Consciousness,&#8221; as well as much more, are discussed thoroughly in my KINDNESS AND THE GOOD SOCIETY, CONNECTIONS OF THE HEART (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2002).  This book is a full-fledged philosophical treatment of kindness, and it contains many, many examples from literature, art, poetry, and psychotherapy.  </p>
<p>Some of these cases are indeed puzzling. In Ibsen&#8217;s A DOLL&#8217;S HOUSE, Nora tells her husband that he had done her &#8220;a great wrong,&#8221; although he had been very kind to her. In Frederick Douglass&#8217; great autobiography (LIFE AND TIMES OF FREDERICK DOUGLASS) includes the following passage: &#8220;[T]he kindness of the slave-master only gilded the chain.  It detracted nothing from its weight or strength. The thought that men are made for other and better uses than slavery throve best under the gentle treatment of a kind master.&#8221; And in THE ADVENTURES OF HUCKLEBERRY FINN, after Jim, the runaway slave, has been recaptured, the local doctor describes Jim to his friends as follows:  &#8220;I see plain enough he&#8217;d be working main hard lately. I liked the nigger for that; I tell you, gentlemen, a nigger like that is worth a thousand dollars&#8211;and kind treatment, too.&#8221;  </p>
<p>These and other cases raise knotty problems. For example, if some cases of kindness are morally good while others are evil, how do we tell the difference? Is it always the case that, as Beverly states, &#8220;We know when it [kindness] is demonstrated to us?&#8221; How do we know?  What is it, exactly, that makes an action or refusal to act really kind as opposed to clever deception?  What makes a person as opposed to a particular act kind, and how is it that kind people can do very unkind things? How is it possible that we can deceive ourselves when we think, mistakenly, that we have done someone a kindness?  </p>
<p>Since &#8220;Expanded Consciousness&#8221; has so ably quoted Nietzsche, I will close with another quotation from that &#8220;master of suspicion,&#8221; as Paul Ricoeur referred to him.  &#8220;The proficiency of our finest scholars, their heedless industry, their heads smoking day and night, their very craftsmanship&#8211;how often the real meaning of all this lies in the desire to keep something hidden from oneself!&#8221; &#8211;ON THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20586</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20586</guid>
		<description>On the point of whether or not accumulation of wealth is done on the backs of the poor (that an individual cannot amass wealth without having caused harm) my perspective has long been that &#039;somewhere in the world an individual may/may not have suffered in poverty/injustice to allow me to make this gain&#039;.  And I follow with a brief consideration of how likely this may be true.  

Usually I can imagine truth - that someone, somewhere, worked to help my gain be possible - and did so from an environment of impoverishment.  Similarly, if I pay &#039;what the market will bear&#039; for labor, what are the conditions in which the laborer finds him/herself?  Can I pay more than market value for labor even if my own gain is reduced?  

I do not mean tossing $$ about willy-nilly - I mean what can I afford for this labor?  How much does the outcome of the labor benefit me?  How does it benefit (or tend to crush) the life of the laborer?  It also means I am inclined to ask How important is the gain to me in the face of what it may cost another?  

To some extent this line of inquiry also plays into issues of &#039;safety net&#039; social policy like universal health care.  We do not live in a time when everyone in town happens to know the family across town is suffering and can rally around to meet the need.  

It&#039;s a big world with billions of folks in it. On the assumption that there is need, we can attempt to devise ways to pool our resources and ask a public body to distribute uplifting and/or life-saving support.  The public body does this on my behalf because I cannot know of every individual&#039;s need.  

I have worked in a high-needs school community and have witnessed both children and parents &#039;perk up&#039; and begin to thrive over time as a result of committed and intelligent support effort on the part of service deliverers (including teachers, including both academic and social/economic gain). When I remarked on the shift of children&#039;s faces when they anticipate justice/compassion and it does not develop, I meant children hoping/anticipating adults will deliver. Following a path of blaming folks as &#039;lazy&#039; is at best ignorant (unaware). 

Whomever has greater &quot;power&quot; is in stronger position to guide toward justice/compassion in matters of social policy - whether it be &#039;social&#039; as in a community, a state, a nation, or global. Power can be seen as simply as &#039;life experience&#039; and need not be associated with a specific role.  

We may not need &quot;government&quot; (democratically elected bodies) to organize social benefit on our behalf, but it is theoretically much more practical/sensible to use government this way - much as a governing body of any organization, such as that of a minor league team, a sportsman&#039;s group, or an economic cooperative venture may be organized.  The idea is that we vote individuals - assign them by our vote - to look after a task on behalf of the group.  This is neither capitalist nor communist except as the governing body makes it.  Social democracy makes a lot of sense in theory as it implies human beings organizing elected bodies for themselves to look after what needs to be done - including policy that reflects our level of interest in compassion/justice.

The US Constitution is indeed a wonder, but it is not necessarily 100% sacred. Jefferson himself suggested it should be re-written by a special congress to do so every generation or so.  

Jefferson also held a belief that every individual is essentially &quot;aiming for the best that can be.&quot;  I have found this to be true and have known a number of sometimes maligned individuals who are viewed as lazy or worse.  A recent study discovered the poor in America are far more likely than the more wealthy to act generously, and to share even scarce resources.  I have often wondered how Jefferson would view where we have taken ourselves.  

Jefferson&#039;s take on the inherent dangers of banking institutions holds up, I believe - as does Eisenhower&#039;s &quot;beware the military/industrial complex&quot;.  &quot;Industrial&quot; has become &quot;mega-corporation&quot;, and compassion/justice is not a primary motivator of these any more than it may/may not be found in our elected governing bodies.  

We are &quot;one family&quot; whether we like it or not.  Kindness when it is comfortable or present in our immediate moment is one thing.  Kindness (compassion/justice) by extrapolation extended to unknown, unseen, but easily imagined need is another, and is the one area I believe we do not often consider.

If we are to practice awareness of the latter (unknown but imaginable need) we - I believe - cannot help but temper our efforts toward personal gain with strong questions of &quot;want vs need&quot;.  

In may respects, we remain in a condition of &quot;it&#039;s all about me&quot; (and those I am pleased to know among my social/career/economic set.)

For me the call to kindness is deep, often un-heard, and I do hope we humans are &quot;evolving&quot; toward greater response to this call.  As stated earlier, I have witnessed it in children - and I have come to the belief this call to justice/compassion is as innate as any contrary innate call - including selfishness, etc. We can nurture, bring forth, make room for, ... etc... this more noble call in ourselves once we are awake to its existence.  

Best Regards!  Maggie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the point of whether or not accumulation of wealth is done on the backs of the poor (that an individual cannot amass wealth without having caused harm) my perspective has long been that &#8217;somewhere in the world an individual may/may not have suffered in poverty/injustice to allow me to make this gain&#8217;.  And I follow with a brief consideration of how likely this may be true.  </p>
<p>Usually I can imagine truth &#8211; that someone, somewhere, worked to help my gain be possible &#8211; and did so from an environment of impoverishment.  Similarly, if I pay &#8216;what the market will bear&#8217; for labor, what are the conditions in which the laborer finds him/herself?  Can I pay more than market value for labor even if my own gain is reduced?  </p>
<p>I do not mean tossing $$ about willy-nilly &#8211; I mean what can I afford for this labor?  How much does the outcome of the labor benefit me?  How does it benefit (or tend to crush) the life of the laborer?  It also means I am inclined to ask How important is the gain to me in the face of what it may cost another?  </p>
<p>To some extent this line of inquiry also plays into issues of &#8217;safety net&#8217; social policy like universal health care.  We do not live in a time when everyone in town happens to know the family across town is suffering and can rally around to meet the need.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a big world with billions of folks in it. On the assumption that there is need, we can attempt to devise ways to pool our resources and ask a public body to distribute uplifting and/or life-saving support.  The public body does this on my behalf because I cannot know of every individual&#8217;s need.  </p>
<p>I have worked in a high-needs school community and have witnessed both children and parents &#8216;perk up&#8217; and begin to thrive over time as a result of committed and intelligent support effort on the part of service deliverers (including teachers, including both academic and social/economic gain). When I remarked on the shift of children&#8217;s faces when they anticipate justice/compassion and it does not develop, I meant children hoping/anticipating adults will deliver. Following a path of blaming folks as &#8216;lazy&#8217; is at best ignorant (unaware). </p>
<p>Whomever has greater &#8220;power&#8221; is in stronger position to guide toward justice/compassion in matters of social policy &#8211; whether it be &#8217;social&#8217; as in a community, a state, a nation, or global. Power can be seen as simply as &#8216;life experience&#8217; and need not be associated with a specific role.  </p>
<p>We may not need &#8220;government&#8221; (democratically elected bodies) to organize social benefit on our behalf, but it is theoretically much more practical/sensible to use government this way &#8211; much as a governing body of any organization, such as that of a minor league team, a sportsman&#8217;s group, or an economic cooperative venture may be organized.  The idea is that we vote individuals &#8211; assign them by our vote &#8211; to look after a task on behalf of the group.  This is neither capitalist nor communist except as the governing body makes it.  Social democracy makes a lot of sense in theory as it implies human beings organizing elected bodies for themselves to look after what needs to be done &#8211; including policy that reflects our level of interest in compassion/justice.</p>
<p>The US Constitution is indeed a wonder, but it is not necessarily 100% sacred. Jefferson himself suggested it should be re-written by a special congress to do so every generation or so.  </p>
<p>Jefferson also held a belief that every individual is essentially &#8220;aiming for the best that can be.&#8221;  I have found this to be true and have known a number of sometimes maligned individuals who are viewed as lazy or worse.  A recent study discovered the poor in America are far more likely than the more wealthy to act generously, and to share even scarce resources.  I have often wondered how Jefferson would view where we have taken ourselves.  </p>
<p>Jefferson&#8217;s take on the inherent dangers of banking institutions holds up, I believe &#8211; as does Eisenhower&#8217;s &#8220;beware the military/industrial complex&#8221;.  &#8220;Industrial&#8221; has become &#8220;mega-corporation&#8221;, and compassion/justice is not a primary motivator of these any more than it may/may not be found in our elected governing bodies.  </p>
<p>We are &#8220;one family&#8221; whether we like it or not.  Kindness when it is comfortable or present in our immediate moment is one thing.  Kindness (compassion/justice) by extrapolation extended to unknown, unseen, but easily imagined need is another, and is the one area I believe we do not often consider.</p>
<p>If we are to practice awareness of the latter (unknown but imaginable need) we &#8211; I believe &#8211; cannot help but temper our efforts toward personal gain with strong questions of &#8220;want vs need&#8221;.  </p>
<p>In may respects, we remain in a condition of &#8220;it&#8217;s all about me&#8221; (and those I am pleased to know among my social/career/economic set.)</p>
<p>For me the call to kindness is deep, often un-heard, and I do hope we humans are &#8220;evolving&#8221; toward greater response to this call.  As stated earlier, I have witnessed it in children &#8211; and I have come to the belief this call to justice/compassion is as innate as any contrary innate call &#8211; including selfishness, etc. We can nurture, bring forth, make room for, &#8230; etc&#8230; this more noble call in ourselves once we are awake to its existence.  </p>
<p>Best Regards!  Maggie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whitney</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/07/kindness/comment-page-2#comment-20584</link>
		<dc:creator>Whitney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14633#comment-20584</guid>
		<description>The fact that &quot;we’ve grown afraid of kindness, wary of it — that it’s become dangerous to practice&quot; demonstrates to me its awesome power. Kindness is disarming and there is no genuine way to defeat it. Sure, you can resist but real kindness and honesty is real power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that &#8220;we’ve grown afraid of kindness, wary of it — that it’s become dangerous to practice&#8221; demonstrates to me its awesome power. Kindness is disarming and there is no genuine way to defeat it. Sure, you can resist but real kindness and honesty is real power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
