<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recovery Ahead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead</link>
	<description>On Point is a live, two-hour morning news-analysis program, produced by WBUR 90.9 and NPR.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:43:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WaitingOut</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-23066</link>
		<dc:creator>WaitingOut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 02:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-23066</guid>
		<description>Messrs Shiller and Siegel are all reputed economists, Mr. Shiller in particular having much to his credit predicting the impending crisis. However, I heard not a single word about the fundamentals of what is coming. To a non-economist like myself who had managed to educate myself tremendously over the last 4 years, and possessing a PhD in a real subject, the key issue to us is DEBT, both households and government, and its drag on the economy, not to mention total dependence on the continued confidence on the debt markets.

The second is the lofty imbalance in this economy. 40% of profits in 2007 was due to financial companies, that is not counting their bonuses. This sends a strong signal to the rest of the economy, to people such as myself, your skills and work do not count.

Until these fundamental issues are reformed and debts are paid down, I do not see any strong growth for years to come. Any statements otherwise are simply wishful thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Messrs Shiller and Siegel are all reputed economists, Mr. Shiller in particular having much to his credit predicting the impending crisis. However, I heard not a single word about the fundamentals of what is coming. To a non-economist like myself who had managed to educate myself tremendously over the last 4 years, and possessing a PhD in a real subject, the key issue to us is DEBT, both households and government, and its drag on the economy, not to mention total dependence on the continued confidence on the debt markets.</p>
<p>The second is the lofty imbalance in this economy. 40% of profits in 2007 was due to financial companies, that is not counting their bonuses. This sends a strong signal to the rest of the economy, to people such as myself, your skills and work do not count.</p>
<p>Until these fundamental issues are reformed and debts are paid down, I do not see any strong growth for years to come. Any statements otherwise are simply wishful thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Dibble</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-23065</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Dibble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 02:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-23065</guid>
		<description>The last post on August 4th, from Lon Ponschock, was a link to blogspot he contended was 72 pages, an article on the  turns of the recession.  I couldn&#039;t access the article without signing up but checked the author Tyler Durben, finding him associated with speeches on the value of writing/posting anonymously, weird.  The article credited also one David Rosenberg, well-known bear, late of Merrill Lynch, now in Canada.  Google that name and click the first, Business Insider, article with his analysis of the stock market miniboom of March to May 8th.  Believe me, I don&#039;t track stocks without a bottle of aspirin at the ready.  But that is not 72 pages.  It&#039;s a lot quicker to take in than the Wall Street Journal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last post on August 4th, from Lon Ponschock, was a link to blogspot he contended was 72 pages, an article on the  turns of the recession.  I couldn&#8217;t access the article without signing up but checked the author Tyler Durben, finding him associated with speeches on the value of writing/posting anonymously, weird.  The article credited also one David Rosenberg, well-known bear, late of Merrill Lynch, now in Canada.  Google that name and click the first, Business Insider, article with his analysis of the stock market miniboom of March to May 8th.  Believe me, I don&#8217;t track stocks without a bottle of aspirin at the ready.  But that is not 72 pages.  It&#8217;s a lot quicker to take in than the Wall Street Journal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PM</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-23064</link>
		<dc:creator>PM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 01:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-23064</guid>
		<description>further...
And while we are standing in the midst of highly charged phenomena and issues on all sides, personally I look forward to the day when the us/them dichotomy falls away so that we as a culture and nation can really address the challenges that face us in a meaningful and effective manner.  As long as we stand divided, dualistic tendencies will rule the todays and tomorrows to come.  Maybe the time has come to eradicate this multi- (much less two) party system.
Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>further&#8230;<br />
And while we are standing in the midst of highly charged phenomena and issues on all sides, personally I look forward to the day when the us/them dichotomy falls away so that we as a culture and nation can really address the challenges that face us in a meaningful and effective manner.  As long as we stand divided, dualistic tendencies will rule the todays and tomorrows to come.  Maybe the time has come to eradicate this multi- (much less two) party system.<br />
Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PM</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-23063</link>
		<dc:creator>PM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 01:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-23063</guid>
		<description>Well dear millard-fillmore, as all deft debaters know (and I would never include myself in that category), participants usually succumb to personal attacks when they themselves have no substantive statements to further their viewpoint.  Such tactics indeed make me feel sorry for those (often for the Republicans) who have to stoop to such feeble measures.
Cheerios.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well dear millard-fillmore, as all deft debaters know (and I would never include myself in that category), participants usually succumb to personal attacks when they themselves have no substantive statements to further their viewpoint.  Such tactics indeed make me feel sorry for those (often for the Republicans) who have to stoop to such feeble measures.<br />
Cheerios.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millard-fillmore</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-23059</link>
		<dc:creator>millard-fillmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-23059</guid>
		<description>And PM, if you don&#039;t like my &quot;berating&quot;, it&#039;ll probably make you &lt;b&gt;empathize&lt;/b&gt; with all those who were at the receiving end of Democrat berating and give you an idea of how they felt. A wonderful, compassionate moment for humanity, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And PM, if you don&#8217;t like my &#8220;berating&#8221;, it&#8217;ll probably make you <b>empathize</b> with all those who were at the receiving end of Democrat berating and give you an idea of how they felt. A wonderful, compassionate moment for humanity, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millard-fillmore</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-23057</link>
		<dc:creator>millard-fillmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-23057</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Millard-fillmore, I wonder why you interpret people’s comments as basically apologetic, delusional and intellectually dishonest?
Can anyone disagree with you without your berating them, or is that the only means by which you can feel superior? Seems rather sad if that’s the case, and all the more reason not to give your comments any credence whatsoever.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

PM, please feel free to disagree with me (though it&#039;d be helpful to know which facts&lt;/b&gt; you disagree with) - that&#039;s the beauty of our country and its wonderful value of freedom of expression. BTW, how much &quot;berating&quot; of others did the Democrats indulge in over the past eight years? I have first-hand experience of witnessing it - so all I learned about &quot;berating&quot; and mentioning facts, I learned from observing my liberal friends and their reactions to Bush-Cheney - I guess they also wanted to feel superior to those who voted for, and supported Bush. What&#039;s sauce for the goose, is sauce for the gander, no? Or are you saying that the Democrats and Obama deserve special treatment, and that the berating is only reserved for Republicans? 

If my mentioning of facts makes you or others uncomfortable and bursts your Obama balloon of Hope-n-Change, that&#039;s hardly my problem. Feel free to not give credence to my comments - I guess I&#039;m giving people like you an easy way out to dismiss facts, and I&#039;m fine with that. And if you are not a Democrat apologist and instead hold all political parties accountable, especially the one in power, then my comment shouldn&#039;t bother you - it&#039;s specifically addressed towards Democrat and Obama apologists, like Nancy.

Oh, and if any Republicans think I&#039;m their buddy based on my criticism of Democrats and Obama, think again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Millard-fillmore, I wonder why you interpret people’s comments as basically apologetic, delusional and intellectually dishonest?<br />
Can anyone disagree with you without your berating them, or is that the only means by which you can feel superior? Seems rather sad if that’s the case, and all the more reason not to give your comments any credence whatsoever.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>PM, please feel free to disagree with me (though it&#8217;d be helpful to know which facts you disagree with) &#8211; that&#8217;s the beauty of our country and its wonderful value of freedom of expression. BTW, how much &#8220;berating&#8221; of others did the Democrats indulge in over the past eight years? I have first-hand experience of witnessing it &#8211; so all I learned about &#8220;berating&#8221; and mentioning facts, I learned from observing my liberal friends and their reactions to Bush-Cheney &#8211; I guess they also wanted to feel superior to those who voted for, and supported Bush. What&#8217;s sauce for the goose, is sauce for the gander, no? Or are you saying that the Democrats and Obama deserve special treatment, and that the berating is only reserved for Republicans? </p>
<p>If my mentioning of facts makes you or others uncomfortable and bursts your Obama balloon of Hope-n-Change, that&#8217;s hardly my problem. Feel free to not give credence to my comments &#8211; I guess I&#8217;m giving people like you an easy way out to dismiss facts, and I&#8217;m fine with that. And if you are not a Democrat apologist and instead hold all political parties accountable, especially the one in power, then my comment shouldn&#8217;t bother you &#8211; it&#8217;s specifically addressed towards Democrat and Obama apologists, like Nancy.</p>
<p>Oh, and if any Republicans think I&#8217;m their buddy based on my criticism of Democrats and Obama, think again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PM</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-23052</link>
		<dc:creator>PM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 21:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-23052</guid>
		<description>Put, thanks for the film link.
It was interesting to say the least and some moments (and characters) memorable.
I had indeed not see it before, but for some reason the name lodged in my memory banks.
Millard-fillmore, I wonder why you interpret people&#039;s comments as basically apologetic, delusional and intellectually dishonest?
Can anyone disagree with you without your berating them, or is that the only means by which you can feel superior?  Seems rather sad if that&#039;s the case, and all the more reason not to give your comments any credence whatsoever.
Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put, thanks for the film link.<br />
It was interesting to say the least and some moments (and characters) memorable.<br />
I had indeed not see it before, but for some reason the name lodged in my memory banks.<br />
Millard-fillmore, I wonder why you interpret people&#8217;s comments as basically apologetic, delusional and intellectually dishonest?<br />
Can anyone disagree with you without your berating them, or is that the only means by which you can feel superior?  Seems rather sad if that&#8217;s the case, and all the more reason not to give your comments any credence whatsoever.<br />
Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-08-05 &#171; Lasting Impression</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-23051</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-08-05 &#171; Lasting Impression</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-23051</guid>
		<description>[...] Recovery Ahead? &#8211; On Point with Tom Ashbrook Some hopeful signs out there for the economy. The GDP’s plunge has slowed — some economists see it bottoming out, and turning around. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recovery Ahead? &#8211; On Point with Tom Ashbrook Some hopeful signs out there for the economy. The GDP’s plunge has slowed — some economists see it bottoming out, and turning around. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-23029</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-23029</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t believe what I was hearing when I listened to the show last night.  The opinions of two esoteric Keynesian economists who sit in an ivory tower and call after call from people who are &quot;drinking the cool aid&quot;.  The only rational comment uttered was from a caller who said &quot;our government is no longer of the people and for the people&quot;.  Every summer on NPR I hear people spouting off about a good summer read, well if you want to understand our current economic problems I would sugest the following:

Richistan by Robert Frank
Free Lunch by David Cay Johnston
The Revolution by Ron Paul

If you are at all interestested in where we are heading as a society I would also suggest:

1984 by George Orwell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t believe what I was hearing when I listened to the show last night.  The opinions of two esoteric Keynesian economists who sit in an ivory tower and call after call from people who are &#8220;drinking the cool aid&#8221;.  The only rational comment uttered was from a caller who said &#8220;our government is no longer of the people and for the people&#8221;.  Every summer on NPR I hear people spouting off about a good summer read, well if you want to understand our current economic problems I would sugest the following:</p>
<p>Richistan by Robert Frank<br />
Free Lunch by David Cay Johnston<br />
The Revolution by Ron Paul</p>
<p>If you are at all interestested in where we are heading as a society I would also suggest:</p>
<p>1984 by George Orwell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe B.</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-23018</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-23018</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the nice comments Rachel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the nice comments Rachel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putney Swope</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-23015</link>
		<dc:creator>Putney Swope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 06:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-23015</guid>
		<description>Karen I hear you on the prices. I&#039;m spending two to three times what I spent a two years ago for a bag of groceries.
I&#039;ve been expanding the vegetable garden, but it&#039;s hard to count on it. For instance I lost half my bean crop to the weather recently and I&#039;m now worried about the tomato blight. 

As for the worse recession since the Great Depression well it seems to me it&#039;s far fro mover and we could be heading for stagnation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karen I hear you on the prices. I&#8217;m spending two to three times what I spent a two years ago for a bag of groceries.<br />
I&#8217;ve been expanding the vegetable garden, but it&#8217;s hard to count on it. For instance I lost half my bean crop to the weather recently and I&#8217;m now worried about the tomato blight. </p>
<p>As for the worse recession since the Great Depression well it seems to me it&#8217;s far fro mover and we could be heading for stagnation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lon C Ponschock</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-23012</link>
		<dc:creator>Lon C Ponschock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 03:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-23012</guid>
		<description>For anyone still watching this topic.

Here is an analysis of how and why end of the recession talk is hollow.

It is called The End of the End of the Recession. It will take time to go through (72 pages,  mostly one page graphs) but worth it.

http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/07/end-of-end-of-recession.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone still watching this topic.</p>
<p>Here is an analysis of how and why end of the recession talk is hollow.</p>
<p>It is called The End of the End of the Recession. It will take time to go through (72 pages,  mostly one page graphs) but worth it.</p>
<p><a href="http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/07/end-of-end-of-recession.html" rel="nofollow">http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/07/end-of-end-of-recession.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millard-fillmore</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-23006</link>
		<dc:creator>millard-fillmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-23006</guid>
		<description>Ah, yes. The apologists for Obama and the Democrats are out in full force with their delusional and intellectually dishonest comments. :)

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Obama had no choice but to continue the bailout policies, because changing course would have been tantamount to telling tax-payers that the hundreds of billions Bush spent would just be written off as waste by the new administration.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

But Obama did part ways - at least when campaigning - on the previous administration&#039;s policy on Iraq war with no negative effect, and without acknowledging that the money spent in Iraq was a waste. Obama had no choice to continue with the bailouts not because of the feel-good reason you mention, but because he became a President thanks to &quot;campaign contributions&quot; (a nice euphemism for bribes) from those special interests who needed a bailout. Did you even look at the resume of his cabinet picks and their connections to the Wall St. companies? Or are you really that unaware of how things work in Washington? If your ignorance is willful, then it&#039;s downright criminal.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Personally, I think Obama should have scrapped the bailouts, but Republicans would have had a field day convincing Americans that Obama had just wasted all of Bush’s and the tax-payers hard fought efforts at stemming the recession.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Really? Then how come Obama still won in November even though the majority of public was against those bailouts (look at polls taken during those times)? And how would the Republicans have had a field day when majority of Americans were against those bailouts, including many Republicans in the House? Short memory, Nancy? Or are you indulging in revisionist and &lt;b&gt;your&lt;/b&gt; version of facts?

&lt;i&gt;&quot;President Obama, of course, just can’t win with Republicans.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Don&#039;t know what that means and why he needs to win with the Republicans - he ran on his agenda (not the Republicans&#039; agenda) and got a clear mandate to implement it. He did win in November with the Republicans around, promised single-payer healthcare 1.5 years ago contingent on Democrats being in control - which they are now. Who exactly is stopping him from implementing responsible policies when Democrats are in the driver&#039;s seat in Washington, DC? 

Sorry to say, but I have a feeling you&#039;re an Obama supporter, and your comment is typical apologia for him and his failure to implement Hope and Change which you swallowed. As usual, it&#039;s easier to blame others instead of being introspective, because if Obama is wrong, then that implicates you and those who voted for him. And how can you &lt;i&gt;ever&lt;/i&gt; be wrong? There are always Republicans to take the blame. And so on the stupidity rolls on either side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes. The apologists for Obama and the Democrats are out in full force with their delusional and intellectually dishonest comments. <img src='http://www.onpointradio.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><i>&#8220;Obama had no choice but to continue the bailout policies, because changing course would have been tantamount to telling tax-payers that the hundreds of billions Bush spent would just be written off as waste by the new administration.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>But Obama did part ways &#8211; at least when campaigning &#8211; on the previous administration&#8217;s policy on Iraq war with no negative effect, and without acknowledging that the money spent in Iraq was a waste. Obama had no choice to continue with the bailouts not because of the feel-good reason you mention, but because he became a President thanks to &#8220;campaign contributions&#8221; (a nice euphemism for bribes) from those special interests who needed a bailout. Did you even look at the resume of his cabinet picks and their connections to the Wall St. companies? Or are you really that unaware of how things work in Washington? If your ignorance is willful, then it&#8217;s downright criminal.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Personally, I think Obama should have scrapped the bailouts, but Republicans would have had a field day convincing Americans that Obama had just wasted all of Bush’s and the tax-payers hard fought efforts at stemming the recession.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Really? Then how come Obama still won in November even though the majority of public was against those bailouts (look at polls taken during those times)? And how would the Republicans have had a field day when majority of Americans were against those bailouts, including many Republicans in the House? Short memory, Nancy? Or are you indulging in revisionist and <b>your</b> version of facts?</p>
<p><i>&#8220;President Obama, of course, just can’t win with Republicans.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know what that means and why he needs to win with the Republicans &#8211; he ran on his agenda (not the Republicans&#8217; agenda) and got a clear mandate to implement it. He did win in November with the Republicans around, promised single-payer healthcare 1.5 years ago contingent on Democrats being in control &#8211; which they are now. Who exactly is stopping him from implementing responsible policies when Democrats are in the driver&#8217;s seat in Washington, DC? </p>
<p>Sorry to say, but I have a feeling you&#8217;re an Obama supporter, and your comment is typical apologia for him and his failure to implement Hope and Change which you swallowed. As usual, it&#8217;s easier to blame others instead of being introspective, because if Obama is wrong, then that implicates you and those who voted for him. And how can you <i>ever</i> be wrong? There are always Republicans to take the blame. And so on the stupidity rolls on either side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-23004</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-23004</guid>
		<description>The &quot;interview&quot; with Hardwood was so shallow and uninformative that I stopped listening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;interview&#8221; with Hardwood was so shallow and uninformative that I stopped listening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Husemeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-23002</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Husemeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-23002</guid>
		<description>Go to your local grocery store and see if the prices of the items you are buying have risen.  I find that prices are from 10 to 30 percent higher.  So inflation is what percentage of the recovery?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go to your local grocery store and see if the prices of the items you are buying have risen.  I find that prices are from 10 to 30 percent higher.  So inflation is what percentage of the recovery?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Dibble</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-23000</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Dibble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-23000</guid>
		<description>Jonas, I think you&#039;re right about so much.  And I am so sorry if the training programs are not targeted.  Don&#039;t get me going on education that educates you for the previous generation, for the needs of the past.  There is a wild goose chase element to what is going on now.  I had thought Michigan had its eye on a real future.  No, the &quot;invisible hand&quot; of capitalism has misled us hugely.  I mean, yes, it has misled us.  The questions on the table are huge, and meanwhile people are poor without hope, sick without care, homeless, bored/anxious/restless/mad.  
   Question:  there are 6 or so billion people; it seems the more profits churn their way, the more corruption here or there leads them unto starvation.  The more the World consumes, the greater the GDP&#039;s, the worse off the planet is in terms of environmental preservation; the less the GDP&#039;s, the more all 6 billion have to hunker down, tighten the belts (sicken, starve).  How can we think in a century that people gain the know-how to live twice as long, yet provisions for needing them here don&#039;t come along with Adam Smith&#039;s instructions.
   Does the world have a place (work) for 6 billion people, cheap labor without limit (work that wouldn&#039;t be adding plastic trash and fumes galore)?  Does the U.S. have need us all, some 300 million, with work best done in the US?
    Would someone address this?  The only answer I come to is that if bees die off, and pollinization has to be done by hand, then huge numbers of people will be needed to fertilize every pear, every plum.  And if you didn&#039;t want children to grow up and do that, well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonas, I think you&#8217;re right about so much.  And I am so sorry if the training programs are not targeted.  Don&#8217;t get me going on education that educates you for the previous generation, for the needs of the past.  There is a wild goose chase element to what is going on now.  I had thought Michigan had its eye on a real future.  No, the &#8220;invisible hand&#8221; of capitalism has misled us hugely.  I mean, yes, it has misled us.  The questions on the table are huge, and meanwhile people are poor without hope, sick without care, homeless, bored/anxious/restless/mad.<br />
   Question:  there are 6 or so billion people; it seems the more profits churn their way, the more corruption here or there leads them unto starvation.  The more the World consumes, the greater the GDP&#8217;s, the worse off the planet is in terms of environmental preservation; the less the GDP&#8217;s, the more all 6 billion have to hunker down, tighten the belts (sicken, starve).  How can we think in a century that people gain the know-how to live twice as long, yet provisions for needing them here don&#8217;t come along with Adam Smith&#8217;s instructions.<br />
   Does the world have a place (work) for 6 billion people, cheap labor without limit (work that wouldn&#8217;t be adding plastic trash and fumes galore)?  Does the U.S. have need us all, some 300 million, with work best done in the US?<br />
    Would someone address this?  The only answer I come to is that if bees die off, and pollinization has to be done by hand, then huge numbers of people will be needed to fertilize every pear, every plum.  And if you didn&#8217;t want children to grow up and do that, well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKing</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-22999</link>
		<dc:creator>SKing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-22999</guid>
		<description>Stuff happens in cycles...this applies even to the economy - it will do well for a while then it go down into the crapper...and so forth.  As an average person all I do is live a frugal life, save when things are good, educate myself and my family, learn constantly and work smart. I take care of myself, my family and my community and I don&#039;t depend on Wall Street or Main Street to do the right thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuff happens in cycles&#8230;this applies even to the economy &#8211; it will do well for a while then it go down into the crapper&#8230;and so forth.  As an average person all I do is live a frugal life, save when things are good, educate myself and my family, learn constantly and work smart. I take care of myself, my family and my community and I don&#8217;t depend on Wall Street or Main Street to do the right thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonas</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-22997</link>
		<dc:creator>jonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-22997</guid>
		<description>Ellen,

No, there is no real job retraining going on in Mi, in part because there are no jobs, in part because despitee the public statments of politicans and industry, they are not willing to invest in real job training for real jobs.

Antecdotal evidence of how someone created an industry 60 years ago is diverting but has nothing to do with the reality of detroit.  To try to make this a matter of whether one is an optimist or not misses the point and helps to obfescate(?) the real problem.  

Of course any thinking person wants the world economy to get off of the oil standard, etc.  And certainly the auto industry will do anything and everything to avoid change, even to the point of destroying Detroit and the environment.  But that isn&#039;t why Detroit is economically dead.  it is dead because world capitalism (I hate to use cliches but there it is)has cheaper places to make its products, for instance China where it uses free prison labor.  There is no way that an industrial society such as Michigan can compete with dictatorships that not only allow but require that its citizens work under horrendous conditions for virtually no wages.  Come on!!!! American politicans, media, industry complains about workers getting overtime!!! About getting vacations!!!!!!  They complain about industry having to pay its fair of taxes to keep up the roads and sewers that it uses.

I guess that I would ask that you name one industry that will be put in Michigan and that will provide living wages to the millions of unemployed people.  And please say something more than a cliche about how some new industries will magically appear as if some variant of the Adam Smith capitalist myths about the invisible hand that guides the economy and insures that all turns out well.  

I don&#039;t mean to sound mean.  But Detroit and the people who are destitute there matter to me and the current cliches such as Shiller&#039;s end comments are beyond comprehension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ellen,</p>
<p>No, there is no real job retraining going on in Mi, in part because there are no jobs, in part because despitee the public statments of politicans and industry, they are not willing to invest in real job training for real jobs.</p>
<p>Antecdotal evidence of how someone created an industry 60 years ago is diverting but has nothing to do with the reality of detroit.  To try to make this a matter of whether one is an optimist or not misses the point and helps to obfescate(?) the real problem.  </p>
<p>Of course any thinking person wants the world economy to get off of the oil standard, etc.  And certainly the auto industry will do anything and everything to avoid change, even to the point of destroying Detroit and the environment.  But that isn&#8217;t why Detroit is economically dead.  it is dead because world capitalism (I hate to use cliches but there it is)has cheaper places to make its products, for instance China where it uses free prison labor.  There is no way that an industrial society such as Michigan can compete with dictatorships that not only allow but require that its citizens work under horrendous conditions for virtually no wages.  Come on!!!! American politicans, media, industry complains about workers getting overtime!!! About getting vacations!!!!!!  They complain about industry having to pay its fair of taxes to keep up the roads and sewers that it uses.</p>
<p>I guess that I would ask that you name one industry that will be put in Michigan and that will provide living wages to the millions of unemployed people.  And please say something more than a cliche about how some new industries will magically appear as if some variant of the Adam Smith capitalist myths about the invisible hand that guides the economy and insures that all turns out well.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mean to sound mean.  But Detroit and the people who are destitute there matter to me and the current cliches such as Shiller&#8217;s end comments are beyond comprehension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putney Swope</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-22996</link>
		<dc:creator>Putney Swope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-22996</guid>
		<description>Here it is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08-chcHKPJw&amp;feature=related</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here it is:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08-chcHKPJw&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08-chcHKPJw&amp;feature=related</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pumamoon</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/recovery-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-22995</link>
		<dc:creator>Pumamoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=14862#comment-22995</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reminder PS.  I&#039;m sure I&#039;ve seen it, but I don&#039;t recall by your description.  I&#039;ll keep it on my radar screen...
Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reminder PS.  I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve seen it, but I don&#8217;t recall by your description.  I&#8217;ll keep it on my radar screen&#8230;<br />
Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
