<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week in the News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39</link>
	<description>On Point is a live, two-hour morning news-analysis program, produced by WBUR 90.9 and NPR.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:01:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Putney Swope</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-25020</link>
		<dc:creator>Putney Swope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-25020</guid>
		<description>millard-fillmore just my point. Nixon&#039;s health care reforms make the Democrat&#039;s look like conservatives.

He makes the Republican&#039;s look like extremist.

This is why Ted Kennedy had regrets when he fought the plan all those years ago. Alas, hindsight is 20/20.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>millard-fillmore just my point. Nixon&#8217;s health care reforms make the Democrat&#8217;s look like conservatives.</p>
<p>He makes the Republican&#8217;s look like extremist.</p>
<p>This is why Ted Kennedy had regrets when he fought the plan all those years ago. Alas, hindsight is 20/20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millard-fillmore</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-25018</link>
		<dc:creator>millard-fillmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-25018</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Nixon’s health care plan is better than what the Democrats are proposing today! Nixon wanted to embraced tighter regulation of insurers, calling on states to approve specific plans, oversee rates, ensure adequate disclosure, require an annual audit and take other appropriate measures to insure a better health care system for all Americans. Can anyone imagine one Republican coming up with a plan like this today?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
====

Good point, PS. Nixon is demonized a lot for Watergate - and rightly so, but what&#039;s ignored by the (new generation of) liberals today is that many of the liberal laws on health, environment etc. were signed by Nixon. I was surprised to find that out when I decided to go beyond what the mainstream media regularly shouts about him. Whether he did that of his own initiative or because of a strong Congress is irrelevant when it comes to the positive consequences of all such laws he passed.
And can you imagine that the Democrats would come up with such a plan today? Sadly, they are in the pockets of big businesses and corrupt, just like the Republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Nixon’s health care plan is better than what the Democrats are proposing today! Nixon wanted to embraced tighter regulation of insurers, calling on states to approve specific plans, oversee rates, ensure adequate disclosure, require an annual audit and take other appropriate measures to insure a better health care system for all Americans. Can anyone imagine one Republican coming up with a plan like this today?&#8221;</i><br />
====</p>
<p>Good point, PS. Nixon is demonized a lot for Watergate &#8211; and rightly so, but what&#8217;s ignored by the (new generation of) liberals today is that many of the liberal laws on health, environment etc. were signed by Nixon. I was surprised to find that out when I decided to go beyond what the mainstream media regularly shouts about him. Whether he did that of his own initiative or because of a strong Congress is irrelevant when it comes to the positive consequences of all such laws he passed.<br />
And can you imagine that the Democrats would come up with such a plan today? Sadly, they are in the pockets of big businesses and corrupt, just like the Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putney Swope</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24970</link>
		<dc:creator>Putney Swope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24970</guid>
		<description>Our government is dysfunctional. It does not work due too the special interest and how they influence the outcomes of everything done in Washington. As Paul Krugman stateed in his OPED today: &lt;i&gt;&quot;America is a better country in many ways than it was 35 years ago, but our political system’s ability to deal with real problems has been degraded to such an extent that I sometimes wonder whether the country is still governable.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; I have too agree with this. It seems that nothing can be done without lobbyist and corporate money influencing the outcome. 

Nixon&#039;s health care plan is better than what the Democrats are proposing today! Nixon wanted to embraced tighter regulation of insurers, calling on states to approve specific plans, oversee rates, ensure adequate disclosure, require an annual audit and take other appropriate measures to insure a better health care system for all Americans. Can anyone imagine one Republican coming up with a plan like this today? 

We can sit here all day going back and forth about reforming health care, the bottom line is the special interest have already got what they wanted. We are going to be throwing good money after bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our government is dysfunctional. It does not work due too the special interest and how they influence the outcomes of everything done in Washington. As Paul Krugman stateed in his OPED today: <i>&#8220;America is a better country in many ways than it was 35 years ago, but our political system’s ability to deal with real problems has been degraded to such an extent that I sometimes wonder whether the country is still governable.&#8221;</i> I have too agree with this. It seems that nothing can be done without lobbyist and corporate money influencing the outcome. </p>
<p>Nixon&#8217;s health care plan is better than what the Democrats are proposing today! Nixon wanted to embraced tighter regulation of insurers, calling on states to approve specific plans, oversee rates, ensure adequate disclosure, require an annual audit and take other appropriate measures to insure a better health care system for all Americans. Can anyone imagine one Republican coming up with a plan like this today? </p>
<p>We can sit here all day going back and forth about reforming health care, the bottom line is the special interest have already got what they wanted. We are going to be throwing good money after bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Dibble</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24966</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Dibble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24966</guid>
		<description>It seems pretty obvious to me the government is paralyzed because both executive and legislature depend on huge money to get elected.  They will face great belching TV ads that can only be answered with equal and opposite TV financing.  Banks and insurers and so on, to cover their behinds, end up financing both parties.  Here in my corner of Massachusetts, where insurers remain because they are still raking in money from self-employed like me, and being profitable are paying huge taxes (I assume; Senator Kerry assured Senator Hatch on Sunday that no, insurers are not leaving Massachusetts, and so reform is apparently not so bad).  Here a regional newspaper explained that the representative who is not on board with single payer is the one with a large and struggling insurer as well as many hospitals in his district.  
   So since that is my rep in Washington, I tried to e-mail him.  I spent a few hours, fortunately wisened-up enough to save my text before hitting &quot;send.&quot;  &quot;Send&quot; does a total and immediate wipe-out.  Apparently that&#039;s the only way to reach him.  So I sought out the Ways and Means Committee site, where he sits, and sent my missive to Congressman Rangel, the chair.  I had also e-mailed Kerry; also the White House.  Rangel&#039;s site bounced back thank you very much right away.
   The Senate Finance Committe -- I think I know who all the members are who are working on health care, and I haven&#039;t thought of any bright things to try to say to them.  Chris Dodd, Max Baucis, Senator Grassley, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins...  Right?  
    For someone nonpolitical, not terribly well-read, all I have to offer is over a decade of living in the trenches with this warp in the body politic, worrying why.  Showing up loudly at rallies is one thing, but you might be rallying &quot;Stop This Change,&quot; where the status quo you are up against is the financial structure of the election process.  
   I noticed that Obama was playing golf with some honcho from AIG.  He&#039;s got to understand where AIG is coming from, but I&#039;m afraid he needs the support of the dollars from all of AIG&#039;s various dimensions.  The government is bought and paid for.  I don&#039;t really blame it.  But how to get around it?  
    It makes me miss Teddy Kennedy, yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems pretty obvious to me the government is paralyzed because both executive and legislature depend on huge money to get elected.  They will face great belching TV ads that can only be answered with equal and opposite TV financing.  Banks and insurers and so on, to cover their behinds, end up financing both parties.  Here in my corner of Massachusetts, where insurers remain because they are still raking in money from self-employed like me, and being profitable are paying huge taxes (I assume; Senator Kerry assured Senator Hatch on Sunday that no, insurers are not leaving Massachusetts, and so reform is apparently not so bad).  Here a regional newspaper explained that the representative who is not on board with single payer is the one with a large and struggling insurer as well as many hospitals in his district.<br />
   So since that is my rep in Washington, I tried to e-mail him.  I spent a few hours, fortunately wisened-up enough to save my text before hitting &#8220;send.&#8221;  &#8220;Send&#8221; does a total and immediate wipe-out.  Apparently that&#8217;s the only way to reach him.  So I sought out the Ways and Means Committee site, where he sits, and sent my missive to Congressman Rangel, the chair.  I had also e-mailed Kerry; also the White House.  Rangel&#8217;s site bounced back thank you very much right away.<br />
   The Senate Finance Committe &#8212; I think I know who all the members are who are working on health care, and I haven&#8217;t thought of any bright things to try to say to them.  Chris Dodd, Max Baucis, Senator Grassley, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins&#8230;  Right?<br />
    For someone nonpolitical, not terribly well-read, all I have to offer is over a decade of living in the trenches with this warp in the body politic, worrying why.  Showing up loudly at rallies is one thing, but you might be rallying &#8220;Stop This Change,&#8221; where the status quo you are up against is the financial structure of the election process.<br />
   I noticed that Obama was playing golf with some honcho from AIG.  He&#8217;s got to understand where AIG is coming from, but I&#8217;m afraid he needs the support of the dollars from all of AIG&#8217;s various dimensions.  The government is bought and paid for.  I don&#8217;t really blame it.  But how to get around it?<br />
    It makes me miss Teddy Kennedy, yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24965</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24965</guid>
		<description>Thank you Linda. I have always admired the Kennedy family. J.F.K. was my favorite Kennedy. He was centrist, practical, fair-minded, and honest. Everything I thought candidate Obama would be as president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Linda. I have always admired the Kennedy family. J.F.K. was my favorite Kennedy. He was centrist, practical, fair-minded, and honest. Everything I thought candidate Obama would be as president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putney Swope</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24963</link>
		<dc:creator>Putney Swope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24963</guid>
		<description>Well it seems I was wrong on the poll numbers; Zogby has one poll that Louise quoted, 45% and in another section of their site it has a poll that was 51%. Go figure.

Polls while they are an overview are also not giving us the whole picture. That said, I say this as an Obama supporter who is not going too vote for him when he runs again in 2012. 

One thing is for sure he is spending his political capital real fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it seems I was wrong on the poll numbers; Zogby has one poll that Louise quoted, 45% and in another section of their site it has a poll that was 51%. Go figure.</p>
<p>Polls while they are an overview are also not giving us the whole picture. That said, I say this as an Obama supporter who is not going too vote for him when he runs again in 2012. </p>
<p>One thing is for sure he is spending his political capital real fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putney Swope</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24962</link>
		<dc:creator>Putney Swope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24962</guid>
		<description>Louise I was just on the Zogby site and they said Obama had a 51% approval rating. 

As an independent I&#039;m not happy at all with the Democrats. That said I loath the Republicans as they seemed to have done a lot of damage to this country. For me it&#039;s a matter of picking the lesser of two evils or just not voting.

Which is starting too look like a real good option.

It seem the real issue is how dysfunctional government is in general. 

Take the whole financial crisis. Well it started with deregulation under Reagen and then Clinton did the worse thing by allowing Default Swaps to be legal. Something that was not until 2000. The deregulation&#039;s were also championed by Alan Greenspan who had way to much power and is a Libertarian so his free market ideas were put into play. We are paying the price for all this, the Great Recession. Plenty of blame to go around here.

My question is what kind of society do we want? 
Not too many seem to want to answer this.
It&#039;s easier to scream and yell and call Obama a socialist and call his health care ideas a government take over then ask some real hard questions on how move forward with health care in this country. 
Health care is at a crisis now, not 10 years down the road, but now. If we don&#039;t fix this then we are doomed here. The insurance and pharmaceutical corporations are not interested in our well being, they are interested in their profits. 

Health care in this country needs to rebuilt from the ground up. Anything less is a lot joke and it will not do a thing too change how things are done. 
Personally I don&#039;t care if have a single payer or a system like they have in Switzerland, but I just want this mess cleaned up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louise I was just on the Zogby site and they said Obama had a 51% approval rating. </p>
<p>As an independent I&#8217;m not happy at all with the Democrats. That said I loath the Republicans as they seemed to have done a lot of damage to this country. For me it&#8217;s a matter of picking the lesser of two evils or just not voting.</p>
<p>Which is starting too look like a real good option.</p>
<p>It seem the real issue is how dysfunctional government is in general. </p>
<p>Take the whole financial crisis. Well it started with deregulation under Reagen and then Clinton did the worse thing by allowing Default Swaps to be legal. Something that was not until 2000. The deregulation&#8217;s were also championed by Alan Greenspan who had way to much power and is a Libertarian so his free market ideas were put into play. We are paying the price for all this, the Great Recession. Plenty of blame to go around here.</p>
<p>My question is what kind of society do we want?<br />
Not too many seem to want to answer this.<br />
It&#8217;s easier to scream and yell and call Obama a socialist and call his health care ideas a government take over then ask some real hard questions on how move forward with health care in this country.<br />
Health care is at a crisis now, not 10 years down the road, but now. If we don&#8217;t fix this then we are doomed here. The insurance and pharmaceutical corporations are not interested in our well being, they are interested in their profits. </p>
<p>Health care in this country needs to rebuilt from the ground up. Anything less is a lot joke and it will not do a thing too change how things are done.<br />
Personally I don&#8217;t care if have a single payer or a system like they have in Switzerland, but I just want this mess cleaned up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24956</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24956</guid>
		<description>&quot;What exactly is stopping Democrats – who have control of both houses in the Congress and the WH – from implementing their agenda? Blaming the Republicans&quot;

Indeed. They have to do better than that. In fairness, Republicans were handed control of the entire government and yet, it did not become smaller, spending was not reduced, foreign policy did not become any more effective, the government&#039;s involvement in personal lives of Americans has increased. Seems to be a recurring theme nowadays. It is a very fair comment by Louise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What exactly is stopping Democrats – who have control of both houses in the Congress and the WH – from implementing their agenda? Blaming the Republicans&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed. They have to do better than that. In fairness, Republicans were handed control of the entire government and yet, it did not become smaller, spending was not reduced, foreign policy did not become any more effective, the government&#8217;s involvement in personal lives of Americans has increased. Seems to be a recurring theme nowadays. It is a very fair comment by Louise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24955</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24955</guid>
		<description>&quot;If Mickey Foster can give a mea culpa, then so can I. This whole health care debate has caused me to let off some steam as well. So I’ll echo the words Mickey, “God Bless Ted Kennedy, he was a great American, R.I.P.&quot;

Posted by Louise, on August 29th

Louise, thanks for this.  As with many great Americans -Democrats and Republicans - he wasn&#039;t perfect, but he loved our state and this country and served it for many years in the best way he knew how.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If Mickey Foster can give a mea culpa, then so can I. This whole health care debate has caused me to let off some steam as well. So I’ll echo the words Mickey, “God Bless Ted Kennedy, he was a great American, R.I.P.&#8221;</p>
<p>Posted by Louise, on August 29th</p>
<p>Louise, thanks for this.  As with many great Americans -Democrats and Republicans &#8211; he wasn&#8217;t perfect, but he loved our state and this country and served it for many years in the best way he knew how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24954</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24954</guid>
		<description>Orin Hatch says Republicans just can&#039;t support a bill with a public option - as a Democrat, I just can&#039;t support a bill without one.  How can we compromise?  What would Teddy do?

We need to change the law in Mass. regarding giving the governor the power to appoint an interim senator that will not be allowed to run for the seat, as the Senator requested.  Can&#039;t we also add that the governor would be required to appoint someone that is of the same party as the person that has vacated the seat? i.e., if a Democrat was voted in and dies/vacates the seat, another Democrat would need to be appointed as interim, and,the opposite would also be true.  I&#039;m going to call all my reps this week, as well as Deleo and Murray, and put my two cents in.  MA deserves to have two votes, and as someone that voted for Teddy, I want someone to replace him of the same ideology.

here, here, aj!
right on, Michael!
thanks, Louise!

Linda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orin Hatch says Republicans just can&#8217;t support a bill with a public option &#8211; as a Democrat, I just can&#8217;t support a bill without one.  How can we compromise?  What would Teddy do?</p>
<p>We need to change the law in Mass. regarding giving the governor the power to appoint an interim senator that will not be allowed to run for the seat, as the Senator requested.  Can&#8217;t we also add that the governor would be required to appoint someone that is of the same party as the person that has vacated the seat? i.e., if a Democrat was voted in and dies/vacates the seat, another Democrat would need to be appointed as interim, and,the opposite would also be true.  I&#8217;m going to call all my reps this week, as well as Deleo and Murray, and put my two cents in.  MA deserves to have two votes, and as someone that voted for Teddy, I want someone to replace him of the same ideology.</p>
<p>here, here, aj!<br />
right on, Michael!<br />
thanks, Louise!</p>
<p>Linda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millard-fillmore</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24953</link>
		<dc:creator>millard-fillmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24953</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m further to the left on many issues, and I agree with Louise above. What exactly is stopping Democrats - who have control of both houses in the Congress and the WH - from implementing their agenda? Blaming the Republicans - who don&#039;t even have enough numbers in the Senate to filibuster - and the Fox News at this point is simply grasping at straws, and shows an inability to face up to the reality of Democrats and their lack of a backbone. Call your Democrat Representative and Senator!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m further to the left on many issues, and I agree with Louise above. What exactly is stopping Democrats &#8211; who have control of both houses in the Congress and the WH &#8211; from implementing their agenda? Blaming the Republicans &#8211; who don&#8217;t even have enough numbers in the Senate to filibuster &#8211; and the Fox News at this point is simply grasping at straws, and shows an inability to face up to the reality of Democrats and their lack of a backbone. Call your Democrat Representative and Senator!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24952</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24952</guid>
		<description>Michael, you really crack me up. Democrats control the Senate, the House, and the Executive branch and you want to blame Fox News and Republicans for the pathetic performance of the Democratic party. Democrats can pass any legislation they want without a single Republican vote. It&#039;s your Democrat party that can&#039;t even support the legislation Obama is offering up because it&#039;s so radical and harmful to the country. According to a recent Zogby poll, Obama&#039;s approval rating is at 45%!! How&#039;s that &quot;Hope and Change&quot; working for you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, you really crack me up. Democrats control the Senate, the House, and the Executive branch and you want to blame Fox News and Republicans for the pathetic performance of the Democratic party. Democrats can pass any legislation they want without a single Republican vote. It&#8217;s your Democrat party that can&#8217;t even support the legislation Obama is offering up because it&#8217;s so radical and harmful to the country. According to a recent Zogby poll, Obama&#8217;s approval rating is at 45%!! How&#8217;s that &#8220;Hope and Change&#8221; working for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putney Swope</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24948</link>
		<dc:creator>Putney Swope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24948</guid>
		<description>Researchers Ellen Nolte and Martin McKee of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine found that the U.S. is falling even further behind in preventable deaths. The researchers tracked deaths they deemed preventable by access to timely and effective health care in 1997 and 1998 and 2000 and 2003. The U.S. dropped to last among the 19 industrialized nations studied.  &lt;i&gt;The research estimates that if the U.S. health care system performed as well as those of those top three countries (France, Japan and Australia), there would be 101,000 fewer deaths in the United States per year.&lt;/i&gt;

A report by the Commonwealth Fund also ranks the U.S. highest in total cost of care and last among industrialized countries &quot;in preventing deaths through use of timely and effective medical care.&quot; In a recent FRONTLINE report comparing the health care systems of five other capitalist democracies, &quot;Sick Around the World,&quot; WASHINGTON POST reporter T.R. Reid notes that, &quot;The World Health Organization says the U.S. health care system rates 37th in the world in terms of quality and fairness. All the other rich countries do better than we do, and yet they spend a heck of a lot less.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Researchers Ellen Nolte and Martin McKee of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine found that the U.S. is falling even further behind in preventable deaths. The researchers tracked deaths they deemed preventable by access to timely and effective health care in 1997 and 1998 and 2000 and 2003. The U.S. dropped to last among the 19 industrialized nations studied.  <i>The research estimates that if the U.S. health care system performed as well as those of those top three countries (France, Japan and Australia), there would be 101,000 fewer deaths in the United States per year.</i></p>
<p>A report by the Commonwealth Fund also ranks the U.S. highest in total cost of care and last among industrialized countries &#8220;in preventing deaths through use of timely and effective medical care.&#8221; In a recent FRONTLINE report comparing the health care systems of five other capitalist democracies, &#8220;Sick Around the World,&#8221; WASHINGTON POST reporter T.R. Reid notes that, &#8220;The World Health Organization says the U.S. health care system rates 37th in the world in terms of quality and fairness. All the other rich countries do better than we do, and yet they spend a heck of a lot less.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putney Swope</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24947</link>
		<dc:creator>Putney Swope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24947</guid>
		<description>Ellen you should watch the Bill Moyers Journal.
The documentary Money Driven Medicine is an eye opener.

I did not know that doctors can threaten too sue patents who refuse treatment, this is a new one.   

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/08282009/profile.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ellen you should watch the Bill Moyers Journal.<br />
The documentary Money Driven Medicine is an eye opener.</p>
<p>I did not know that doctors can threaten too sue patents who refuse treatment, this is a new one.   </p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/08282009/profile.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/08282009/profile.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Dibble</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24945</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Dibble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24945</guid>
		<description>Abolitionists in the 19th century were bothered that people all over the USA were profiting from slavery.  I&#039;m not an historian, but the rerun of the show about the privateers in the American revolution morphing into the great Triangle Trade, with slaves being a crucial leg of that certainly reminds me.
    Should American investors be profiting from health insurance?  Are not the profits in that sixth of our economy hurting the sick or injured, and stifling those trying to get businesses and lives started?  
   If investments/profits are thwarting part of our economy and vast numbers of our people, isn&#039;t it time to make a change?
    Surely there are ways to make a profit in this country, so poised for change, so in need of new ventures.  Surely we can disinvest from insurers the way we disinvested in South Africa, holding that sector in some way hostage until they create their own solution.
    I can well imagine the way monied interests would not care to help.   People -- individuals -- with their money might be able to help, not by signs and demonstrations but by effectively leaning on that corner of the market till it straightens itself with the common interests of us all.
    Right now, profits (mostly for big funds, I understand) go up, up, up, and affordability of care goes down, down, down.  We ration our own care because the cost of insurance, even with pared-down plans, way dominates the normal budget, which means we can&#039;t afford the basics in health care; those basics are carefully carved into patches where the insured pays a third.  That sort of thing.  
  We should be allies of the insurers, not pawns from whom the maximum profit is to be dragged.  What am I, an animal?  Profit should not be part of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abolitionists in the 19th century were bothered that people all over the USA were profiting from slavery.  I&#8217;m not an historian, but the rerun of the show about the privateers in the American revolution morphing into the great Triangle Trade, with slaves being a crucial leg of that certainly reminds me.<br />
    Should American investors be profiting from health insurance?  Are not the profits in that sixth of our economy hurting the sick or injured, and stifling those trying to get businesses and lives started?<br />
   If investments/profits are thwarting part of our economy and vast numbers of our people, isn&#8217;t it time to make a change?<br />
    Surely there are ways to make a profit in this country, so poised for change, so in need of new ventures.  Surely we can disinvest from insurers the way we disinvested in South Africa, holding that sector in some way hostage until they create their own solution.<br />
    I can well imagine the way monied interests would not care to help.   People &#8212; individuals &#8212; with their money might be able to help, not by signs and demonstrations but by effectively leaning on that corner of the market till it straightens itself with the common interests of us all.<br />
    Right now, profits (mostly for big funds, I understand) go up, up, up, and affordability of care goes down, down, down.  We ration our own care because the cost of insurance, even with pared-down plans, way dominates the normal budget, which means we can&#8217;t afford the basics in health care; those basics are carefully carved into patches where the insured pays a third.  That sort of thing.<br />
  We should be allies of the insurers, not pawns from whom the maximum profit is to be dragged.  What am I, an animal?  Profit should not be part of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24943</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24943</guid>
		<description>I think Ted Kennedy spent his last years in the Senate repenting for the crime he committed back in the 60&#039;s on Mary Jo Kopech.  Anyone but a Kennedy would have ended up in jail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Ted Kennedy spent his last years in the Senate repenting for the crime he committed back in the 60&#8217;s on Mary Jo Kopech.  Anyone but a Kennedy would have ended up in jail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24941</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24941</guid>
		<description>thanks to foxs news and if the far-right republican had there way we can look forward to far more sound bites, and opinion instead of facts and in depth coverage and the likes of this below where logic is void in our country.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13Hzn3AvOXA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks to foxs news and if the far-right republican had there way we can look forward to far more sound bites, and opinion instead of facts and in depth coverage and the likes of this below where logic is void in our country.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13Hzn3AvOXA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13Hzn3AvOXA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24940</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24940</guid>
		<description>http://www.epi.org/publications/entry/pm120/

Or When Republican wail about keeping government out of their lives, unless it’s a woman’s body i.e. abortion, gay rights, smoking weed,stem cells research, what is moral based on there beliefs, or pushing religions in schools i.e. creationism as opposed to evolution,

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/on-education/2009/03/30/texas-schools-face-the-evolution-debate.html

Republican cry out how government is so bad,yet believe all court systems, and police don’t abuse there powers than get elected into office and as we have seen mismanaged, starve or attempt to all public programs, except defense, and military spending in which there always tons of unaccounted waste.

A republicans thinking “is as if there had a car for years and didn’t what to repair anything on there car and with run it to the ground than when finally they take it in to the shop the repair bill is in the thousands and cant understand why” And this is the thinking of the republicans to starve government in a attempt to make it small, yet when the repair bill comes in for say infrastructure, state, local governments, they can’t understand why it cost so much.

So therefore republican logic

starve your neighbor, starve your friends, starve your customers, starve the consumers, starve the homeowner, starve your government, starve the poor, starve the weak,starve the sick, but overfed the police and military for when the crap hits the fan which of course it will since orders, power and money trumps social injustices( not always).

And than state that they did everything for themselves and everybody should do the same, yet in reality they had help and support from friends, family, mentors or believe that the selfish made this country great not the ones who sacrifice their lives for our freedoms (not just soldiers, but civil rights leaders,political leaders people in government who work hard to help the U.S. in a whole and anyone fighting for others that cannot).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.epi.org/publications/entry/pm120/" rel="nofollow">http://www.epi.org/publications/entry/pm120/</a></p>
<p>Or When Republican wail about keeping government out of their lives, unless it’s a woman’s body i.e. abortion, gay rights, smoking weed,stem cells research, what is moral based on there beliefs, or pushing religions in schools i.e. creationism as opposed to evolution,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usnews.com/blogs/on-education/2009/03/30/texas-schools-face-the-evolution-debate.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.usnews.com/blogs/on-education/2009/03/30/texas-schools-face-the-evolution-debate.html</a></p>
<p>Republican cry out how government is so bad,yet believe all court systems, and police don’t abuse there powers than get elected into office and as we have seen mismanaged, starve or attempt to all public programs, except defense, and military spending in which there always tons of unaccounted waste.</p>
<p>A republicans thinking “is as if there had a car for years and didn’t what to repair anything on there car and with run it to the ground than when finally they take it in to the shop the repair bill is in the thousands and cant understand why” And this is the thinking of the republicans to starve government in a attempt to make it small, yet when the repair bill comes in for say infrastructure, state, local governments, they can’t understand why it cost so much.</p>
<p>So therefore republican logic</p>
<p>starve your neighbor, starve your friends, starve your customers, starve the consumers, starve the homeowner, starve your government, starve the poor, starve the weak,starve the sick, but overfed the police and military for when the crap hits the fan which of course it will since orders, power and money trumps social injustices( not always).</p>
<p>And than state that they did everything for themselves and everybody should do the same, yet in reality they had help and support from friends, family, mentors or believe that the selfish made this country great not the ones who sacrifice their lives for our freedoms (not just soldiers, but civil rights leaders,political leaders people in government who work hard to help the U.S. in a whole and anyone fighting for others that cannot).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24939</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24939</guid>
		<description>Its always funny listening to republicans talk about, people spending others money, when they dominated all three branchs of government, and let billions go unaccounted for in iraq, afgan( guess that’s the meaning of a fiscal conservative)And spent like a drunken sailor but with very little to show for it.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0127/dailyUpdate.html

Don’t forget outsourcing Military, CIA, jobs to third parties with immunity to U.S. laws along with iraqi,a afghan.(guess this is how republicans are strong in national defense when they try to outsource our U.S. military, CIA jobs to mercenaries) along with overpaying for that on top of that. For a party who states there the pro military its odd that there would outsource military jobs and work to third parties such as black water.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124511068419617063.html

Or how Republicans allowed and promoted hedge funds managers pay less than 25 percent on there income, and promote a idea it was fine to deny health care to make a profit, even when one is paying for health care.(i guess that the social aspect of the Republican party ration health care as long as it is the private market doing such)Dont forget the people who were bailed out on wall street started with President Bush,before that S&amp;L by bush the first(who made great risk with our money and received all the gains but when it failed the taxes payers flipped the bill)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its always funny listening to republicans talk about, people spending others money, when they dominated all three branchs of government, and let billions go unaccounted for in iraq, afgan( guess that’s the meaning of a fiscal conservative)And spent like a drunken sailor but with very little to show for it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0127/dailyUpdate.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0127/dailyUpdate.html</a></p>
<p>Don’t forget outsourcing Military, CIA, jobs to third parties with immunity to U.S. laws along with iraqi,a afghan.(guess this is how republicans are strong in national defense when they try to outsource our U.S. military, CIA jobs to mercenaries) along with overpaying for that on top of that. For a party who states there the pro military its odd that there would outsource military jobs and work to third parties such as black water.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124511068419617063.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124511068419617063.html</a></p>
<p>Or how Republicans allowed and promoted hedge funds managers pay less than 25 percent on there income, and promote a idea it was fine to deny health care to make a profit, even when one is paying for health care.(i guess that the social aspect of the Republican party ration health care as long as it is the private market doing such)Dont forget the people who were bailed out on wall street started with President Bush,before that S&amp;L by bush the first(who made great risk with our money and received all the gains but when it failed the taxes payers flipped the bill)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/08/week-in-the-news-39/comment-page-2#comment-24932</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpointradio.org/?p=15033#comment-24932</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s too difficult to get Washington to cut back on spending. No matter how much money it taken it, they refused to cut spending. Now the idea of universal healthcare is being pushed, but with no way to pay for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too difficult to get Washington to cut back on spending. No matter how much money it taken it, they refused to cut spending. Now the idea of universal healthcare is being pushed, but with no way to pay for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
