wbur.org
support wbur today!
A Call for Iranian Voices

We’re planning a show for this Monday, Dec. 21 (10-11 a.m. ET) on Iran and its global crackdown on dissent.  We’ll have two superb Iran watchers with us for the hour: Farnaz Fassihi of The Wall Street Journal, who reported recently on Iran’s campaign against Iranians voicing dissent outside Iran, and Karim Sadjadpour of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.  

But we especially want to hear directly from Iranians, and we invite you to call in to the show while we’re on the air live, and/or to post messages here at our website.  Share your stories, your thoughts.

 
 
Listener comments
  • I predict that the IRI operatives will flood the program with calls. Recently the IRI operatives calling themselves an army of cyberwarriors crashed twitter and put it out of commission for a while. Anticipate that Basij will moblilize it’s resources to use the program for their propaganda. It will be interesting to see how Mr. Ashbrook sageguards against that.

    Posted by Saied Assef, on December 20th, 2009 at 4:40 AM
  • Hi;

    You might want to check out the
    Boston Iranians Coalition (B.I.C.)
    (for advancement of Democracy & Human Rights in Iran)
    which has been organizing the after election protests of local Iranian community in Greater Boton area.

    Here is the faceBook page:
    http://www.facebook.com/boston.iranians

    You can also learn about some of their recent events at:
    http://events.kodoom.com/en/organizer/Boston-Iranians-Coalition-3068932

    Posted by Boston Iranians Coalition, on December 20th, 2009 at 10:05 PM
  • I don’t quite understand, Iran has election that the dissenters say were stolen and many republicans and people in the U.S. wish to try and support such dissenters, Yet Afghanistan has a election and even proven to be rigged and stolen and the guy that question that got fired from the U.N. yet it was hailed as a great triumph of democracy by our president and the U.N. folks overseeing Afghanistan election. AS well to note The country of Georgia had a election a year ago who also declared Martial law and attacked peaceful protesters yet the focus was on russia.

    Georgia in regards to Afghanistan had voter fraud, intimidation,attacks of opposition and likes but we heard nothing about this or Honduras election which the democratically election president was ousted, and the election heard under a military Coup yet we didnt hear anything about how a election should not be heard under such circumstances.

    Whats with the Double standards here in the reporting? is it cause the Afghan Pres is our puppet? The Georgian Pres is our puppet(who also by the way spent 800k on McCain run for president, remember “We are all Georgians”, oddly not reported)?or the Folks that performed the Coup in Honduras are more friendly than the President of Honduras?

    It surprises me that U.S. journalist don’t see these double standards or even point them out, We talk about Iran possibly obtaining Nukes and it would start a Arms race in the middle east yet, the fact that Iran is following the IAEA unlike israel, does israel not count as part of this arms race in the middle east? Is this a taboo subject your not allowed to talk about?

    If being a Puppet to the U.S. allows them to break the law, break international laws, Not hold fair elections than say it. Instead of acting as if we treat friend or foe.

    Otherwise it’s seem only to be propaganda, misinformation, promoted and supported by the media which is supposed to be objective and independent.

    Posted by Michael, on December 20th, 2009 at 10:16 PM
  • The view expressed by the caller (Kiyan) for asking the people to put their protests agianst the regime on on hold because of external threats by US, … is NOT a valid argument considering the facts on the ground.

    This is basically wish of the Khamenei-Ahmadinejad regime which is relayed by the organizations and individuals such as NIAC (Nantional Iranian American Council), Abbas Edalat, … who have had direct and indirect relations with the Iranian regime.

    Recently Washigton Post has brought to light the secret relations of Trita Parsi (Head of NIAC) to the Iranian Regime.

    Posted by Boston Iranians Coalition, on December 21st, 2009 at 10:54 AM
  • Here are some articles which reveal the clear connections of some groups such as NIAC to the Iranian Regime:

    Iran advocacy group said to skirt lobby rules
    (WashingtonTimes article about NIAC & Trita Parsi):
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/13/exclusive-did-iranian-advocacy-group-violate-laws/

    Trita Parsi Reports to Tehran (American Thinker article):
    http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/trita_parsi_reports_to_tehran.html

    Posted by Boston Iranians Coalition, on December 21st, 2009 at 11:06 AM
Recent Shows
After ‘No Child Left Behind’
Thursday, March 18, 2010

The Obama administration wants to rewrite No Child Left Behind. We’ll ask what’s coming for American education.

Comments [48]
 
The U.S.-Israel Blowup
Thursday, March 18, 2010

Top Pentagon brass complain the Israel-Palestinian impasse is undermining American interests. We’ll look at the US-Israel moment of crisis.

Comments [160]
On Point Blog
Sonny Rollins on Race and Jazz’s Future

Jazz legend Sonny Rollins joined us to reflect on his storied career and give us his thoughts on the future of music. To celebrate his 80th birthday, the hugely influential tenor saxophonist is embarking on yet another national tour.

More »
 
IED’s in Afghanistan: Hard Numbers

The Department of Defense provided On Point with some statistics about IED attacks in Afghanistan, where there has been an increase in the use of such weapons over the past 14 months. It’s striking to see the spike in numbers — from 2,677 IED incidents in 2007 to 8,159 last year.

More » | Comments [2]
 
Christopher Hill: U.S. Troop Withdrawal ‘On Schedule’

U.S. Ambassaor to Iraq Christopher Hill spoke with On Point live from Baghdad today as early voting gets underway, part of the run-up to Sunday’s elections. “So far so good,” Hill said, despite scattered violence. Hill said that the plan to withdraw U.S. combat troops by Sept. 1, and to leave only a residual advisory force of 50,000 or fewer, remains “very much on schedule.” Observers worry that a spike in violence could derail that timeline.

More »