
Almost three hundred years ago, Johann Sebastian Bach wrote a series of six suites for the then most humble of instruments — the cello, or its ancestor.
They were moving, mournful, joyous, rich with the sound of another age — and soon lost.
Pablo Casals found them a century ago. Cellists now know them by heart.
Pop music critic Eric Siblin knew them not at all when he was out covering Sheryl Crow, Radiohead, Hanson. Then, Bach’s cello suites hit him like a ton of bricks. Changed his life. Sent him on a quest.
This hour, On Point: Eric Siblin, and the mystery of Bach’s cello suites.
You can join the conversation. Tell us what you think — here on this page, on Twitter, and on Facebook.
Guests:
Eric Siblin, award-winning journalist and filmaker and former pop music critic for The Montreal Gazette. He’s author of “The Cello Suites: J.S. Bach, Pablo Casals, and the Search for a Baroque Masterpiece.”
Eric Edberg, professor of music at the DePauw University School of Music in Greencastle, Indiana, where he teaches cello and chamber music.
You can join the conversation. Tell us what you think — here on this page, on Twitter, or on Facebook.












My most favorite piece of music! The first time I heard it I was truly madly deeply captured. I felt like my soul had been given a ‘voice.’ The cello, and these suites in particular, speak directly to me on some deep level.
Posted by sara, on December 7th, 2009 at 11:19 AMBach’s works for solo violin are equally sublime! Any insights on these, vis-a-vis his solo cello suites?
Posted by Todd, on December 7th, 2009 at 11:19 AMRecently, at age 54, touched by the power of the Suites, I took up the cello. I have only made it, haltingly, through the first 8 to 10 measures, but I am brought to tears each time I draw the bow across the strings, and eyes closed, pull Bach’s music from my cello.
Posted by Bambi Sterling, on December 7th, 2009 at 11:23 AMThe cello suites played as I labored and gave birth to my daughter five years ago. They felt deeply fitting at that time. I did not know they had been lost–thank you for this program!
Posted by Lisa, on December 7th, 2009 at 11:27 AMWhy in Heaven’s name are you not broadcasting in stereo? The stereo pilot LED on my little radio has been reliable, up to now.
When I called the admin. number and was transferred to Engineering, I reached an answering [machine].
I reached the listener call-in number, and my question apparently reached a dead end.
This is no way to compete with WGBH/WCRB!
Posted by Nicholas Bodley, on December 7th, 2009 at 11:28 AMI envy Mr Siblin’s opportunity to first experience of the equally-magnificent unaccompanied violin works.
Posted by Robert Evans, on December 7th, 2009 at 11:30 AMI was introduced to the Bach Cello Suites as a struggling music major back in the late 1970’s. I still reamember hearing Pablo Casals saying, “Bach is the God of music!” in his heavily accented voice. Though the guitar was my instrument rather than the cello, the cello suites have remained at the core of my music for the 30 + years since I first heard them. Even though I play parts of them transposed for guitar, I hear them on cello in my heart’s ear.
When I first heard them, I had just re-entered college after a 5 year stint in the army. Being a music major was a tremendous contrast to being an army helicopter gunship pilot. For reasons that I still can’t fully explain, this music resonated very deeply in me. I can hear Segovia playing his transcription of Cello Suite no. 3, which though lacking the resonance of the cello, is a wonder.
Posted by Mel Hughes, on December 7th, 2009 at 11:31 AMThe cello was developed in Bach’s time, not in the 16th century. I think the main instrument of choice of the period was the viola da gamba and from what I read Bach had originally thought of writing the suites for it.
Check out Sainte-Colombe and Marin Marais, both who wrote extensively for the the viola da gamba.
Posted by Putney Swope, on December 7th, 2009 at 11:32 AMHas the author discovered anything new about the suites or Bach, i.e., a reason for publishing yet another book?
Posted by Greg Gerstner, on December 7th, 2009 at 11:39 AMThe suites – beautiful as they are – are not that special (if anything that Bach composed can not be special). What I mean is that a lot of his solo music has the same beauty and complexity. Think of the violin partitas, some of his vocal music.
Also, Mozart and Beethoven were not contemporaries of Bach – even famous ones. More to the point are Telemann and Haendel, who both gained fame where Bach couldn’t.
Posted by Thomas, on December 7th, 2009 at 11:40 AMI adore the Bach Cello Suites and I cannot wait to read this book. It is going on my Christmas gift list today! I was wondering if Siblin viewed Yo Yo Ma’s production of films “Inspired by Bach”? and what he thought of the films? Also, did Siblin read Casals’ _Joys and Sorrows_? Isn’t the passage exciting, when he discovers the manuscript? I look forward to reading your book, very much. Thank-you for writing it! As you said, this music is “sublime.”
Posted by CC in Jamaica Plain, on December 7th, 2009 at 11:44 AMHere is link to the Amazon page that holds the DVD _Inspired by Bach_
http://www.amazon.com/Yo-Yo-Ma-Complete-Suites-Inspired/dp/B0009K7ESW
I am very pleased to listen to this program. I never get tired listenening to these wonderful and magical work.
Posted by Hoshiar Abdollah, on December 7th, 2009 at 11:45 AMMore than twenty years ago I had a very moving experience of visiting Casals’ home in old San Juan in Puerto Rico, where the solo suites were (and maybe still are ) played through the day. I remember hearing a story that late in his life, Casals was so arthritic he could hardly get out of bed, but he would be lifted into a chair for his breakfast then given his cello, and as he played his wracked body would be released from the wracking pain and he’d be able to move and play again. I wonder if Eric Siblin ever heard this story.
Posted by Jim Schley, on December 7th, 2009 at 11:46 AMIt must be mentioned that Casals was an accomplished pianist as well as cellist, and “warmed up” each and every morning before practicing his cello, by playing four hours of Bach on the piano. His extensive knowledge of Bach and the construction of his contrapuntal style informed him, I’m sure, as to choosing performance practice for the cello suites. Not as much of a “mystery” as it may seem without this knowledge.
Posted by Sue Rabut, on December 7th, 2009 at 11:47 AMAlso, a knowledge of the evolution of the string quartet helps us to understand that the trio sonate was all that had evolved in Bach’s time, using the continuo (gamba, cello, theorbo/lute or keyboard) with two soprano/ treble instruments. It wasn’t until Haydn’s time that the cello became an intrinsic part of the “melody line” and even then, the cello parts were pretty rudimentary. Mozart begins to really give more interesting lines to the cello in his string quartets. So, it stands to reason that maybe the “public” didn’t perceive cello as a legitimate solo instrument until later on, long after Bach’s lifetime.
It is great that a layperson is encouraging “regular” people to go out and listen to LIVE classical music. We need more of this! ( I am a professional violinist.)
Casals also composed one of my favorite pieces of all-time: a vocal piece (a capella, actually) called, “O Vos Omnes”. It’s somber, soulful and incredibly beautiful. I sang it years ago. That’s actually how I heard of him rather than Casals the cellist.
Posted by Kevin, on December 7th, 2009 at 11:49 AMMy first exposure to the Suites was the 1990s recording by Rostropovich, which, despite intonation inconsistencies and sloppy editing, are the ones I judge others by. I also have Ma’s second recording and Heinrich Schiff’s. It’s surprising how many interpretations of tempo I hear.
Siblin refers to other instruments playing the Suites. I have Edgar Meyer’s wonderful recording of three of them on double bass, David Leisner’s of the Third on guitar (transposed to A from C), and one by Peter Blanchette on arch-guitar.
But it was that first recording of Rostropovich that inspired me to transcribe the first Bourree for the Third for bass dulcimer, and both Bourrees for tenor chromatic harmonica. They both work very well, not because of my playing, but because they’re Bach.
Tom Baehr, Putney, Vt.
Posted by Tom Baehr, on December 7th, 2009 at 12:22 PMThe recording by John Williams of the 5th Cello Suite was on modern guitar, not Baroque lute. This is important because that piece exists in Bach’s own hand writing. The modern guitar bears very little resemblance to Baroque Lute – sonically or visually. They are both plucked instruments but that’s about it. You should have played a recording by Hopkinson Smith or any of a number of people playing that music on authentic instruments today. That would have communicated a very important sound and idea to your listeners.
Posted by Louis Arnold, on December 7th, 2009 at 12:29 PMCongratulations on your December 7th, 2009 program about Bach’s cello suites. I sincerely hope you will post, with your other material on this presentation, a discography of the different recordings played during the show. For example, the Bach orchestral item played
(Brandenburg Concerto? Orchestral Suite?) for comparison with the solo cello approach was very striking in its own right — worth following up right away as a good means to insight about tempo and emphasis as used by Bach.
Again, many thanks;
Posted by Victor Doherty, on December 7th, 2009 at 12:42 PMVictor Doherty
Probably the most moving performances for my taste are with Pieter Wispelwey, I heard him do them at Lincoln Center one year when I worked there…just sublime…his recording is one I come back to often, almost weekly in fact.
Posted by Paul Marotta, on December 7th, 2009 at 2:07 PMI am a young cellist in high school. I take private lessons and preform in recitals frequently. I always request to play these pieces. Playing unaccompanied Bach is very hard and challenging to play. But the music itself captivates you as you play. I sometimes find it hard to become engaged in the music I play but with these, there is no problem.
Posted by lynn sotschek, on December 7th, 2009 at 9:24 PMThank you for this fantastic show on Bach’s Cello Suites. Your guest Eric Siblin’s story is familiar to me. I too, was a rock music journalist whose life was changed after, in my case, re-discovering classical music, starting in 1999, when someone told me about the Canadian documentary “32 Short Films About Glenn Gould” and, it was piano music that turned me onto Bach.
After discovering various genres of music, but mainly classical, I couldn’t even listen to pop music again. I have found classical music incredibly healing and in 2007, my journey from rock to Bach led me to launch a healing music blog The Whole Music Experience.
Again, thank you for this fabulous show. It left a huge grin on my face and I am happy knowing I’m not the only former rock journalist out there whose life was changed through hearing the works of a classial composer.
Bach’s music by the way is incredibly healing. Even dogs are affected healed by this profound music.
Posted by Patricia, on December 7th, 2009 at 11:04 PMWhen the world is too much and too chaotic and things are piling up and going wrong and the lastest news is depressing, I turn to the Bach Cello Suites, and my breathing becomes even and calm and I can move on….
No matter which recording I play, I begin to see order and can think clearly , again.
Posted by Leslie Miller, on December 7th, 2009 at 11:49 PMI’ve had the distinct pleasure of reading Eric Siblin’s book and I highly recommend it. Mr. Siblin has woven 3 tales around this magnificent music in a manner so captivating that I, a classical illiterate, am now officially intrigued. Not a mean feat.
I do wonder how Bach would react to the knowledge that his Suites are performed at funerals and in television commercials.
Posted by Susan, on December 9th, 2009 at 4:28 PM[...] And, from On Point with Tom Ashbrook, a discussion with author Eric Siblin about the enduring mystery and allure of Bach’s Cello [...]
Posted by heard on the radio « world of music, on December 11th, 2009 at 9:05 AMThank you for this fantastic show on Bach’s Cello Suites. Your guest Eric Siblin’s story is familiar to me. I too, was a rock music journalist whose life was changed after, in my case, re-discovering classical music, starting in 1999, when someone told me about the Canadian documentary “32 Short Films About Glenn Gould” and, it was piano music that turned me onto Bach.
After discovering various genres of music, but mainly classical, I couldn’t even listen to pop music again. I have found classical music incredibly healing and in 2007, my journey from rock to Bach led me to launch a healing music blog The Whole Music Experience.
Again, thank you for this fabulous show. It left a huge grin on my face and I am happy knowing I’m not the only former rock journalist out there whose life was changed through hearing the works of a classial composer.
Bach’s music by the way is incredibly healing. Even dogs are affected healed by this profound music.
Posted by CD, on December 16th, 2009 at 10:04 PMWe welcome comments from all of our listeners. We ask that you stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
While we encourage a robust, open debate on the topic at hand, these comment threads are moderated by On Point and WBUR, and we may delete comments that we judge to be off-topic, unduly repetitive, or that descend into personal, ad hominem attacks.
You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. On Point and WBUR cannot verify the accuracy of comments posted here.