There were several interesting exchanges in Thursday’s first hour between Douglas Holtz-Eakin and Austan Goolsbee, but this one stood out. Holtz-Eakin said that the Treasury plan to take an ownership stake in banks is “very disturbing,” and added: “It’s not the way things should be done in the United States.”
Here’s the transcription of that part of the interview, followed by Goolsbee’s response.
DOUGLAS HOLTZ-EAKIN: The administration went to the Congress with a blank check proposal for $700 billion dollars and talked exclusively about buying securities from Wall Street firms — evidently the policy that Obama wants to defend. There was discussion by the Congress of putting in an insurance plan, of putting in loan opportunities. There was never a word of public discussion about putting taxpayer money into financial firms as equity investments and de facto nationalizing them. I think that’s not the way an administration should conduct itself. That’s at odds with the notion that we have an informed democracy with all of its leadership agreeing on the policies—
TOM ASHBROOK: It’s a Republican administration proposing it.
HOLTZ-EAKIN: It doesn’t matter if it’s a Republican or Democratic administration. It’s not the way things should be done in the United States, and that’s very disturbing if that’s the route they intend to take.
A few minutes later Tom asked Goolsbee for his reaction:
TOM ASHBROOK: What about Hank Paulson’s describing the possibility that the government might actually step in and invest in banks — it’s been described as nationalizing banks. You heard Douglas Holtz-Eakin very skeptical on that front. What about you and the Obama campaign? Good idea or bad?
AUSTAN GOOLSBEE: Well, look, that’s clearly outlined in his authority in the bill. I was actually quite shocked — Douglas Holtz-Eakin wasn’t skeptical, he was outright opposed to it. He appears not to remember that in the bill that was passed, the government is getting warrants in the banks. That the people that they’re buying securities from, the government gets an upside. John McCain himself said that the government ought to get an upside. And this direct infusion of capital into the banks, uh, the government takes an upside. It is, I might point out, almost exactly what the government did with AIG, they gave them money and took equity, and John McCain supported that action. So I was really shocked to hear Doug Holtz-Eakin say he thought that in principle it’s a terrible idea and one that we can’t do. Because what’s clear is that the banks are over-leveraged and under-capitalized. And we are at the precipice of a very, very dangerous situation where you could have banks failing all over the place. If we get to a situation like that, the government must consider all possible options to prevent us from going into a very deep recession.
You can listen to the full show here.




















Goolsbee was brilliant and not just because I happen to be an Obama supporter. He explained McCain’s mortgage proposal better than anyone I’ve heard anywhere and made starkly clear what’s wrong with it. I hope you’ll have him on again, he was brilliant.
Posted by Richard, on October 10th, 2008 at 6:36 am EDTI was very pleased with Thursday’s discussion of the two candidate’s economic plans. I think the Economist reporter offered good balance. Please continue on this path of two extremes and a sane middle.
I am glad the treasury is going into the ownership of companies. I have watched my 401K shrink, my kids’ college savings decline in real value, and our home value fall. I want the whole country to have skin in the game!
Please make me pay higher taxes to employ people to rebuild our infrastructure and new energy grid. Change the tax laws to encourage saving in IRAs. Make me pay to strengthen the safety net for seniors. Make me pay to make sure all citizens have access to health care without the insurance industry going to the bank (if it’s still open!).
We have lived too long on credit — getting much for nothing down in return. I am ready and willing to pay to repair our nation’s infrastructure … I just want a return on investment and transparency in government.
Posted by Anne Greene, on October 11th, 2008 at 12:20 am EDTI like the fact that Mr. Ashbrook kept the discussion civil and on topic. I think Mr. Ashbrook would have been a great moderator for one the presidential debates.
Posted by Joe B., on October 15th, 2008 at 8:51 pm EDTWe welcome comments from all of our listeners.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
These comments are moderated by On Point and WBUR.
This site supports Gravatars.